• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[评估自由且有意识地做出决定及表达个人意愿能力的法医精神病学标准]

[Forensic-psychiatric criteria for evaluating the capacity to take decisions freely and consciously and to express one's will].

作者信息

Kocur Józef, Trendak Wiesława

机构信息

Zakładu Rehabilitacji Psychospołecznej UM w Łodzi.

出版信息

Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2009 Apr-Jun;59(2):136-40.

PMID:20073264
Abstract

The report presents the current views on the development, course, as well as mechanisms underlying some disorders in the sphere of motivational processes, and especially in the sphere of will expression, aspirations and actions. The authors also analyze various aspects of the effect that is exerted by such disorders on such mental and psychosomatic functions that determine the validity of will declaration. The report emphasizes the necessity for separate evaluation of the ability to consciously or freely express will and reach decisions. Another important issue discussed in the paper is the prerequisite of including the effect of a given specific legal situation and factors other than psychopathological that can modify motivation, behavior and actions undertaken by the evaluated person.

摘要

该报告阐述了当前对于动机过程领域,尤其是意志表达、愿望和行动领域中某些障碍的发展、进程及其潜在机制的观点。作者还分析了这些障碍对决定意志宣告有效性的心理和心身功能所产生影响的各个方面。该报告强调有必要对有意识或自由表达意志及做出决定的能力进行单独评估。论文中讨论的另一个重要问题是,需要考虑特定法律情况的影响以及除心理病理学因素之外的其他因素,这些因素可能会改变被评估者的动机、行为和行动。

相似文献

1
[Forensic-psychiatric criteria for evaluating the capacity to take decisions freely and consciously and to express one's will].[评估自由且有意识地做出决定及表达个人意愿能力的法医精神病学标准]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2009 Apr-Jun;59(2):136-40.
2
[Continuous mental disorder as a prerequisite for the loss of legal capacity].[持续性精神障碍作为丧失法律行为能力的前提条件]
Nervenarzt. 2002 Nov;73(11):1094-9. doi: 10.1007/s00115-002-1368-2.
3
[Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].[精神状态与刑事责任——波兰及其他国家的法律法规与医学标准]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2009 Oct-Dec;59(4):309-19.
4
[Forensic psychiatry evaluation of mental competence--from psychopathological case analysis to assessment].[精神能力的法医精神病学评估——从精神病理案例分析到评估]
Gesundheitswesen. 1996 Oct;58(10):543-6.
5
[Psychiatric-psychological opinions in cases of declaration of will invalidation with emphasis on assessment of discretion].[关于意志宣告无效案件中的精神-心理意见,重点在于判断能力评估]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2008 Jan-Mar;58(1):37-42.
6
[Forensic psychiatry evaluation in determining free will and legal competence].
Versicherungsmedizin. 1994 Oct 1;46(5):167-71.
7
[Advanced investigation of testamentary capacity of the mentally disordered].[对精神障碍者遗嘱能力的深入调查]
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Jun;25(3):208-11.
8
[Development of modern classification systems and their effects on forensic psychiatric expert assessment].[现代分类系统的发展及其对法医精神病学专家评估的影响]
Gesundheitswesen. 1994 Dec;56(12):652-6.
9
[Obsessive-compulsive disorders in forensic-psychiatric opinions].[法医精神病学意见中的强迫症]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2009 Apr-Jun;59(2):141-4.
10
[Medical expert assessment in psychiatry].[精神病学中的医学专家评估]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1996 Nov;90(7):623-6.