Suresh Santhanam, Wang Sheila, Porfyris Suzanne, Kamasinski-Sol Richard, Steinhorn David M
Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Children's Memorial Hospital, and Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60614, USA.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Sep;18(9):884-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02638.x.
This study was designed to look at the efficacy of adjuvant massage therapy in children and adolescents who presented to a chronic pediatric pain clinic for management.
After Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent and assent was obtained, all pediatric patients who presented to the outpatient chronic pain clinic at Children's Memorial Hospital from July 2006 to May 2007 were invited to participate in a study that offered massage therapy as an adjunct to conventional pain treatment. Patients (n = 80 sessions, 57 patients) were asked to rate their levels of distress, pain, tension, discomfort, and degree of upset mood on a scale of 1-5 (e.g. for distress 1 = very calm; 5 = very distressed) before and after massage therapy. Paired t-tests were used to compare pre- and postmassage ratings and probability values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni procedure.
After massage therapy, patients reported highly significant improvement in their levels of distress, pain, tension, discomfort, and mood compared with their premassage ratings (all t-values >6.1, ****P < 1 x 10(-8). To control for the possible effects of patients reporting improvements simply as a result of rating their symptoms, we collected control ratings before and after a comparable 'no intervention' time period in a subset of 25 patients. The 'no intervention' time period typically took place in the treatment room with the therapist present. Approximately 60% of the control ratings were obtained before the intervention and 40% were obtained after the massage therapy. None of the differences between the pre- and postratings associated with the 'no intervention' control time period were significant. In these same patients, the difference between the pre- and postmassage ratings were significant, all t-values >3.8, **P < 0.001.
本研究旨在探讨辅助按摩疗法对前往慢性儿科疼痛诊所接受治疗的儿童及青少年的疗效。
经机构审查委员会批准并获得知情同意及同意书后,邀请2006年7月至2007年5月期间前往儿童纪念医院门诊慢性疼痛诊所就诊的所有儿科患者参与一项研究,该研究提供按摩疗法作为传统疼痛治疗的辅助手段。患者(共80人次,57名患者)被要求在按摩治疗前后,按照1 - 5分的量表对自己的痛苦、疼痛、紧张、不适及情绪烦躁程度进行评分(例如,对于痛苦程度,1分表示非常平静;5分表示非常痛苦)。采用配对t检验比较按摩前后的评分,并使用Bonferroni方法对多重比较的概率值进行校正。
与按摩前评分相比,按摩治疗后患者报告称其痛苦、疼痛、紧张、不适及情绪程度均有极显著改善(所有t值>6.1,****P < 1×10⁻⁸)。为控制患者仅因对症状进行评分而报告改善情况的可能影响,我们在25名患者的子集中收集了可比的“无干预”时间段前后的对照评分。“无干预”时间段通常在治疗室由治疗师在场的情况下进行。约60%的对照评分在干预前获得,40%在按摩治疗后获得。与“无干预”对照时间段相关的前后评分差异均无统计学意义。在这些相同的患者中,按摩前后评分的差异具有统计学意义,所有t值>3.8,**P < 0.001。