Cantor Louis B, Katz L Jay, Cheng J Wang, Chen Er, Tong Kuo B, Peabody John W
Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Oct;24(10):2905-18. doi: 10.1185/03007990802379996. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
Despite the significant clinical and economic burden associated with glaucoma, studies evaluating the long-term costs of existing treatments are limited. This study compared the 5-year costs of three treatment strategies: medication, laser trabeculoplasty, and filtering surgeries in managing patients with primary open-angle glaucoma whose intra-ocular pressures were not adequately controlled by two medications.
A Markov model was developed to simulate the transition of treatment progression over a 5-year period to evaluate the total treatment costs associated with each strategy. In the medication arm, medications were the only available treatment, whereas in the laser trabeculoplasty and surgery arms, patients would receive concomitant medications both at the time of the procedure and in subsequent years. Treatment states were determined by the rate of success in controlling patients' intra-ocular pressure in each year. The distribution of treatment states and the transition probabilities between these states were derived from published literature, adjusted or supplemented by the authors' own treatment experiences. Costs assessed in the model included treatment, complications associated with each treatment, and physician office visits obtained from published literature and standardized fees and schedules.
The 5-year cumulative costs were approximately $6571, $4838 and $6363 for patients in the medication, laser trabeculoplasty, and filtering surgery arms, respectively. Costs of third-line medication, first-line medication following laser trabeculoplasty, and post-surgery complications had the greatest impact on the model results in the medication, laser trabeculoplasty, and filtering surgery arms, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity suggested the results were statistically significant (p < 0.001), favoring the use of laser trabeculoplasty.
Over 5 years laser trabeculoplasty was associated with the lowest total costs compared to treatment by medication alone or by filtering surgery for patients who were not adequately controlled by two medications. Future development of glaucoma treatment should focus on reducing the need for post-procedure medical therapy as well as lowering the rate of post-procedure complications. Limited by the availability of the transition probabilities in published literature, the model results need to be validated by prospective or retrospective observational studies.
尽管青光眼带来了巨大的临床和经济负担,但评估现有治疗方法长期成本的研究有限。本研究比较了三种治疗策略的5年成本:药物治疗、激光小梁成形术和滤过性手术,用于治疗眼压未被两种药物充分控制的原发性开角型青光眼患者。
开发了一个马尔可夫模型,以模拟5年期间治疗进展的转变,评估每种策略相关的总治疗成本。在药物治疗组中,药物是唯一可用的治疗方法,而在激光小梁成形术和手术组中,患者在手术时及随后几年都将接受辅助药物治疗。治疗状态由每年控制患者眼压的成功率决定。治疗状态的分布以及这些状态之间的转移概率来自已发表的文献,并由作者自己的治疗经验进行调整或补充。模型中评估的成本包括治疗、每种治疗相关的并发症,以及从已发表的文献、标准化费用和时间表中获取的医生门诊费用。
药物治疗组、激光小梁成形术组和滤过性手术组患者的5年累计成本分别约为6571美元、4838美元和6363美元。三线药物成本、激光小梁成形术后的一线药物成本和手术后并发症分别对药物治疗组、激光小梁成形术组和滤过性手术组的模型结果影响最大。概率敏感性分析表明结果具有统计学意义(p < 0.001),支持使用激光小梁成形术。
对于未被两种药物充分控制的患者,与单独药物治疗或滤过性手术相比,激光小梁成形术在5年期间的总成本最低。青光眼治疗的未来发展应侧重于减少术后药物治疗的需求以及降低术后并发症的发生率。受已发表文献中转移概率可用性的限制,模型结果需要通过前瞻性或回顾性观察性研究进行验证。