Hadizadeh Dariusch R, Gieseke Jürgen, Lohmaier Stefan H, Wilhelm Kai, Boschewitz Jack, Verrel Frauke, Schild Hans H, Willinek Winfried A
Department of Radiology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Radiology. 2008 Nov;249(2):701-11. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2492072033. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
To prospectively compare the accuracy of high-spatial-resolution steady-state magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with standard-resolution first-pass MR angiography in the lower extremities, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.
Institutional ethics committee approval and written informed consent were obtained. Twenty-seven patients (16 men, 11 women; mean age, 64.4 years +/- 14.8 [standard deviation]; range, 26-87 years) suspected of having or known to have peripheral arterial disease underwent first-pass and steady-state MR angiography and DSA. First-pass and steady-state MR angiography were performed in the same patient in the same session and with the same dose of blood pool contrast agent. The most severe stenosis grade of each evaluated segment was measured; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated at first-pass and steady-state MR angiography, with DSA as the reference standard. The kappa coefficient was used to measure the agreement between first-pass MR angiography, steady-state MR angiography, and DSA.
A total of 334 arterial segments were available for intraindividual comparison of first-pass MR angiography, steady-state MR angiography, and DSA in 27 patients. In 20 (74%) of 27 patients, the stenosis grade of at least one of the evaluated vessels differed at steady-state MR angiography from that at first-pass MR angiography. In total, stenosis grade was judged as higher at first-pass MR angiography than at DSA (overestimation) in 28 of 334 segments and as lower (underestimation) in 15 of 334 segments. The stenosis grade as judged at steady-state MR angiography matched with that at DSA in 334 of 334 vessel segments.
High-spatial-resolution steady-state MR angiography allowed for better agreement with DSA regarding stenosis grade in patients with arterial disease compared with standard-resolution arterial-phase first-pass MR angiography.
以前瞻性方式比较高空间分辨率稳态磁共振(MR)血管造影与标准分辨率首次通过MR血管造影在下肢血管成像中的准确性,并以数字减影血管造影(DSA)作为参考标准。
获得机构伦理委员会批准并取得书面知情同意书。27例(16例男性,11例女性;平均年龄64.4岁±14.8[标准差];年龄范围26 - 87岁)疑似患有或已知患有外周动脉疾病的患者接受了首次通过和稳态MR血管造影以及DSA检查。首次通过和稳态MR血管造影在同一患者的同一次检查中进行,且使用相同剂量的血池造影剂。测量每个评估节段的最严重狭窄程度;以DSA作为参考标准,计算首次通过和稳态MR血管造影的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。kappa系数用于衡量首次通过MR血管造影、稳态MR血管造影与DSA之间的一致性。
27例患者中共有334个动脉节段可用于首次通过MR血管造影、稳态MR血管造影与DSA的个体内比较。在27例患者中的20例(74%)中,至少有一条评估血管在稳态MR血管造影时的狭窄程度与首次通过MR血管造影时不同。总体而言,在334个节段中,有28个节段的首次通过MR血管造影判断的狭窄程度高于DSA(高估),15个节段低于DSA(低估)。在334个血管节段中,稳态MR血管造影判断的狭窄程度与DSA匹配。
与标准分辨率动脉期首次通过MR血管造影相比,高空间分辨率稳态MR血管造影在动脉疾病患者的狭窄程度判断上与DSA的一致性更好。