Anzidei Michele, Napoli Alessandro, Marincola Beatrice Cavallo, Nofroni Italo, Geiger Daniel, Zaccagna Fulvio, Catalano Carlo, Passariello Roberto
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Radiology. 2009 May;251(2):457-66. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2512081197.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of gadofosveset-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the assessment of carotid artery stenosis, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard, and to determine the value of reading first-pass, steady-state, and "combined" (first-pass plus steady-state) MR angiograms.
This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and all subjects gave written informed consent. MR angiography and DSA were performed in 84 patients (56 men, 28 women; age range, 61-76 years) with carotid artery stenosis at Doppler ultrasonography. Three readers reviewed the first-pass, steady-state, and combined MR data sets, and one independent observer evaluated the DSA images to assess stenosis degree, plaque morphology and ulceration, stenosis length, and tandem lesions. Interobserver agreement regarding MR angiographic findings was analyzed by using intraclass correlation and Cohen kappa coefficients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by using the McNemar test to determine possible significant differences (P < .05).
Interobserver agreement regarding all MR angiogram readings was substantial. For grading stenosis, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were, respectively, 90%, 92%, 91%, and 91% for first-pass imaging; 95% each for steady-state imaging; and 96%, 99%, 99%, and 97% for combined imaging. For evaluation of plaque morphology, respective values were 84%, 86%, 88%, and 82% for first-pass imaging; 98%, 97%, 98%, and 97% for steady-state imaging; and 98%, 100%, 100%, and 97% for combined imaging. Differences between the first-pass, steady-state, and combined image readings for assessment of stenosis degree and plaque morphology were significant (P < .001).
Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography is a promising technique for imaging carotid artery stenosis. Steady-state image reading is superior to first-pass image reading, but the combined reading protocol is more accurate.
以数字减影血管造影(DSA)作为参考标准,评估钆弗塞特增强磁共振(MR)血管造影在评估颈动脉狭窄中的诊断准确性,并确定分析首次通过、稳态及“联合”(首次通过加稳态)MR血管造影的价值。
本研究经当地伦理委员会批准,所有受试者均签署书面知情同意书。对84例经多普勒超声检查发现有颈动脉狭窄的患者(56例男性,28例女性;年龄范围61 - 76岁)进行了MR血管造影和DSA检查。三位阅片者分析首次通过、稳态及联合MR数据集,一位独立观察者评估DSA图像以评估狭窄程度、斑块形态及溃疡、狭窄长度和串联病变。采用组内相关系数和Cohen κ系数分析阅片者间关于MR血管造影结果的一致性。使用McNemar检验计算敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV),以确定可能存在的显著差异(P <.05)。
阅片者间关于所有MR血管造影分析结果的一致性良好。对于狭窄分级,首次通过成像的敏感度、特异度、PPV和NPV分别为90%、92%、91%和91%;稳态成像各项均为95%;联合成像为96%、99%、99%和97%。对于斑块形态评估,首次通过成像的相应值分别为84%、86%、88%和82%;稳态成像为98%、97%、98%和97%;联合成像为98%、100%、100%和97%。首次通过、稳态及联合图像分析在评估狭窄程度和斑块形态方面的差异具有显著性(P <.001)。
钆弗塞特增强MR血管造影是一种很有前景的颈动脉狭窄成像技术。稳态图像分析优于首次通过图像分析,但联合分析方案更准确。