Suppr超能文献

口服降糖药治疗的2型糖尿病患者自我血糖监测频率的影响——一项多中心随机对照试验

Effect of the frequency of self-monitoring blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antidiabetic drugs-a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Scherbaum Werner A, Ohmann Christian, Abholz Heinz-Harald, Dragano Nico, Lankisch Mark

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Rheumatology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Diabetes, European Training Centre in Endocrinology and Metabolism, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2008 Aug 28;3(8):e3087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003087.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Recommendations on the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) vary widely among physicians treating patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Aim of this study was to investigate two testing regimen of SMBG in patients with stable metabolic control.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with T2D treated with oral antidiabetic drugs were randomized to two groups: either one SMBG (low) or four SMBG (high) per week. Subjects were followed up after 3, 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome parameter was the change in HbA1c between baseline and 6 months. Primary outcome criterion was tested by a one-sided t- test for non- inferiority. Secondary outcome parameters were safety, compliance and HbA1c at 3 and 12 months.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the 202 subjects for demographic and sociodemographic parameters and drug treatment. HbA(1)c (%) at baseline was similar in both groups (7.2+/-1.4 vs. 7.2+/-1.0). Non- inferiority was demonstrated for the low group (p = 0.0022) with a difference from baseline to 6 months of 0.24 in the low and of 0.16 in the high group. Compliance with the testing regimen was 82-90% in both groups. There were no statistical significant differences for compliance, HbA(1)c at 3 and 12 months and serious adverse events (SAE).

CONCLUSION

One SMBG per week is as sufficient and safe as four SMBG per week to maintain HbA(1)c in non-insulin treated T2D close to metabolic target. The results of this study are in contrast to current international consensus guidelines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN79164268.

摘要

目的

在治疗2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的医生中,关于血糖自我监测(SMBG)频率的建议差异很大。本研究的目的是调查代谢控制稳定的患者的两种SMBG检测方案。

研究设计与方法

接受口服降糖药治疗的T2D患者被随机分为两组:每周一次SMBG(低频率组)或每周四次SMBG(高频率组)。在3、6和12个月后对受试者进行随访。主要结局参数是基线至6个月时糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的变化。主要结局标准通过单侧t检验进行非劣效性检验。次要结局参数是3个月和12个月时的安全性、依从性和HbA1c。

结果

202名受试者在人口统计学和社会人口统计学参数以及药物治疗方面没有差异。两组基线时的HbA1c(%)相似(7.2±1.4对7.2±1.0)。低频率组显示非劣效性(p = 0.0022),低频率组从基线到6个月的差异为0.24,高频率组为0.16。两组对检测方案的依从性均为82 - 90%。在依从性、3个月和12个月时的HbA1c以及严重不良事件(SAE)方面没有统计学显著差异。

结论

对于非胰岛素治疗的T2D患者,每周一次SMBG在维持HbA1c接近代谢目标方面与每周四次SMBG一样充分且安全。本研究结果与当前国际共识指南相反。

试验注册

Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN79164268。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6779/2518209/62e69433014e/pone.0003087.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验