QC_DR 软件在直接数字化放射系统验收测试和常规质量控制中的应用：使用意大利医学物理学家协会质量控制方案的初步经验。
Application of QC_DR software for acceptance testing and routine quality control of direct digital radiography systems: initial experiences using the Italian Association of Physicist in Medicine quality control protocol.
机构信息
Servizio di Fisica Sanitaria, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
出版信息
J Digit Imaging. 2009 Dec;22(6):656-66. doi: 10.1007/s10278-008-9150-z. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
Abstract
Ideally, medical x-ray imaging systems should be designed to deliver maximum image quality at an acceptable radiation risk to the patient. Quality assurance procedures are employed to ensure that these standards are maintained. A quality control protocol for direct digital radiography (DDR) systems is described and discussed. Software to automatically process and analyze the required images was developed. In this paper, the initial results obtained on equipment of different DDR manufacturers were reported. The protocol was developed to highlight even small discrepancies in standard operating performance.
摘要
理想情况下，医学 X 射线成像系统的设计应在可接受的患者辐射风险下达到最佳图像质量。质量保证程序可确保这些标准得以维持。本文描述并讨论了一种用于直接数字化射线摄影（DDR）系统的质量控制协议。开发了软件来自动处理和分析所需的图像。本文报告了在不同 DDR 制造商的设备上获得的初步结果。该协议旨在突出标准运行性能中的微小差异。
相似文献
1
Application of QC_DR software for acceptance testing and routine quality control of direct digital radiography systems: initial experiences using the Italian Association of Physicist in Medicine quality control protocol.
J Digit Imaging. 2009 Dec;22(6):656-66. doi: 10.1007/s10278-008-9150-z. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
2
Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;129(1-3):276-8. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn033. Epub 2008 Mar 8.
3
Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
Clin Radiol. 2008 May;63(5):487-98. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2007.10.014. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
4
Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Ann ICRP. 2004;34(1):1-73. doi: 10.1016/j.icrp.2004.02.001.
5
Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Jun;4(6):389-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.02.001.
6
Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 Jun;4(6):371-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.02.002.
7
Analysis of digital image quality indexes for CIRS SP01 and CDMAM 3.4 mammographic phantoms.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:418-21. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649179.
8
Management of pediatric radiation dose using Philips digital radiography.
Pediatr Radiol. 2004 Oct;34 Suppl 3:S227-33; discussion S234-41. doi: 10.1007/s00247-004-1274-9.
9
Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;129(1-3):140-3. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn026. Epub 2008 Feb 18.
10
引用本文的文献
1
Evaluation of cassette-based digital radiography detectors using standardized image quality metrics: AAPM TG-150 Draft Image Detector Tests.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 Sep 8;17(5):391-417. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i5.6008.
本文引用的文献
1
Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial.
Med Phys. 2006 Mar;33(3):737-52. doi: 10.1118/1.2164067.
2
Contrast-detail analysis of three flat panel detectors for digital radiography.
Med Phys. 2006 Jun;33(6):1707-19. doi: 10.1118/1.2191014.
3
A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Phys Med Biol. 2006 May 21;51(10):2441-63. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/10/006. Epub 2006 Apr 26.
4
Review of image quality standards to control digital X-ray systems.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1-3):23-5. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci722. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
5
The DIMOND project and its impact on radiation protection.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1-3):3-6. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci700. Epub 2006 Feb 3.
6
A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):220-9. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch562.
7
Evaluation and testing of computed radiography systems.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):201-7. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch554.
8
Performance comparison of an active matrix flat panel imager, computed radiography system, and a screen-film system at four standard radiation qualities.
Med Phys. 2005 Feb;32(2):343-50. doi: 10.1118/1.1843451.
9
Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital x-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set.
Med Phys. 2004 Aug;31(8):2205-11. doi: 10.1118/1.1766421.
10
Assessment of the effects of pixel loss on image quality in direct digital radiography.
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Mar 21;49(6):977-86. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/6/008.
Zotero 插件