• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全视野数字乳腺摄影系统客观与主观图像质量测量的比较

A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.

作者信息

Marshall N W

机构信息

Clinical Physics Group, Barts and the London NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK.

出版信息

Phys Med Biol. 2006 May 21;51(10):2441-63. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/10/006. Epub 2006 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/51/10/006
PMID:16675862
Abstract

This paper presents pre-sampling modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) results for an amorphous selenium (a-Se) full field digital mammography system. MTF was calculated from the image of an angled 0.5 mm thick Cu edge, acquired without additional beam filtration. NNPS data were acquired at detector air-kerma levels ranging from 9.1 microGy to 331 microGy, using a standard mammography x-ray spectrum of 28 kV, Mo/Mo target/filter combination and 4 cm of PMMA additional filtration. Prior to NNPS estimation, the image statistics were assessed using a variance image. This method was able to easily identify a detector artefact and should prove useful in routine quality assurance (QA) measurements. Detector DQE, calculated from the NNPS and MTF data, dropped to 0.3 for low detector air-kerma settings but reached an approximately constant value of 0.6 above 50 microGy at the detector. Subjective image quality data were also obtained at these detector air-kerma settings using the CDMAM contrast-detail (c-d) test object. The c-d data reflected the trend seen in DQE, with threshold contrast increasing at low detector air-kerma values. The c-d data were then compared against predictions made using two established models, the Rose model and a standard signal detection theory model. Using DQE(0), the Rose model gave results within approximately 15% on average for all the detector air-kerma values studied and for detail diameters down to 0.2 mm. Similar agreement was also found between the measured c-d data and the signal detection theory results, which were calculated using an ideal human visual response function and a system magnification of unity. The use of full spatial frequency DQE improved the agreement between the calculated and observer results for detail sizes below 0.13 mm.

摘要

本文介绍了一种非晶硒(a-Se)全视野数字乳腺摄影系统的预采样调制传递函数(MTF)、归一化噪声功率谱(NNPS)和探测量子效率(DQE)结果。MTF是根据在没有额外束流过滤的情况下获取的0.5毫米厚倾斜铜边缘的图像计算得出的。使用28 kV的标准乳腺摄影X射线光谱、钼/钼靶/滤过组合以及4厘米厚的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯附加滤过,在探测器空气比释动能水平为9.1微戈瑞至331微戈瑞范围内获取NNPS数据。在进行NNPS估计之前,使用方差图像评估图像统计信息。该方法能够轻松识别探测器伪影,并且在常规质量保证(QA)测量中应会很有用。根据NNPS和MTF数据计算得出的探测器DQE,在低探测器空气比释动能设置下降至0.3,但在探测器处高于50微戈瑞时达到约0.6的值并保持恒定。还使用CDMAM对比度细节(c-d)测试物体在这些探测器空气比释动能设置下获取了主观图像质量数据。c-d数据反映了DQE中看到的趋势,在低探测器空气比释动能值时阈值对比度增加。然后将c-d数据与使用两个已建立模型(罗斯模型和标准信号检测理论模型)做出的预测进行比较。使用DQE(0),罗斯模型对于所研究的所有探测器空气比释动能值以及低至0.2毫米的细节直径,平均给出的结果误差在约15%以内。在测量的c-d数据与信号检测理论结果之间也发现了类似的一致性,信号检测理论结果是使用理想的人类视觉响应函数和系统放大倍数为1计算得出的。对于小于0.13毫米的细节尺寸,使用全空间频率DQE改善了计算结果与观察者结果之间的一致性。

相似文献

1
A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.全视野数字乳腺摄影系统客观与主观图像质量测量的比较
Phys Med Biol. 2006 May 21;51(10):2441-63. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/10/006. Epub 2006 Apr 26.
2
Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system.全视野数字乳腺摄影系统探测器故障的回顾性分析
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Nov 7;51(21):5655-73. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/21/018. Epub 2006 Oct 16.
3
Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.测量了两个全场数字化乳腺摄影系统的探测量子效率随能量的变化情况。
Phys Med Biol. 2009 May 7;54(9):2845-61. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/9/017. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
4
Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.将定量图像质量测量用于全视野数字化乳腺X线摄影系统质量保证的早期经验。
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Sep 21;52(18):5545-68. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/18/006. Epub 2007 Sep 3.
5
An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.对两种数字射线照相系统的自动曝光控制方案的研究。
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Aug 7;54(15):4645-70. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/15/002. Epub 2009 Jul 10.
6
Characterization of the effects of the FineView algorithm for full field digital mammography.全视野数字化乳腺摄影中 FineView 算法的效果评估。
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Apr 7;57(7):1987-2003. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/7/1987. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
7
Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography.用于乳腺摄影的高分辨率电荷耦合器件(CCD)探测器的物理特性
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Apr 21;52(8):2171-83. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/8/009. Epub 2007 Mar 29.
8
Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors.数字 X 射线探测器的质量控制测量。
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Feb 21;56(4):979-99. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/4/007. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
9
Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.数字乳腺 X 线摄影中的图像质量评估:第一部分。系统的技术特征。
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jul 21;56(14):4201-20. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/14/002. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
10
Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.基于针状光激励磷光体的 CR 乳腺摄影系统的物理评估。
Med Phys. 2012 Feb;39(2):811-24. doi: 10.1118/1.3675403.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiation Detectors and Sensors in Medical Imaging.医学成像中的辐射探测器和传感器。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 26;24(19):6251. doi: 10.3390/s24196251.
2
Detectability comparison between a high energy x-ray phase sensitive and mammography systems in imaging phantoms with varying glandular-adipose ratios.高能X射线相敏成像系统与乳腺X射线摄影系统在对不同腺体-脂肪比例的体模成像时的可检测性比较。
Phys Med Biol. 2017 May 7;62(9):3523-3538. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa644b. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
3
Quality assurance and quality control in mammography: a review of available guidance worldwide.
乳腺 X 线摄影的质量保证和质量控制:对全球现有指南的综述。
Insights Imaging. 2013 Oct;4(5):539-53. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0269-1. Epub 2013 Aug 4.
4
Application of QC_DR software for acceptance testing and routine quality control of direct digital radiography systems: initial experiences using the Italian Association of Physicist in Medicine quality control protocol.QC_DR 软件在直接数字化放射系统验收测试和常规质量控制中的应用:使用意大利医学物理学家协会质量控制方案的初步经验。
J Digit Imaging. 2009 Dec;22(6):656-66. doi: 10.1007/s10278-008-9150-z. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
5
Digital mammography: what do we and what don't we know?数字化乳腺摄影:我们知道什么,又不知道什么?
Eur Radiol. 2007 Aug;17(8):1931-42. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0586-1. Epub 2007 Feb 14.