Cutullic Erwan, Delaby Luc, Causeur David, Michel Guillaume, Disenhaus Catherine
INRA, UMR1080 Dairy Production, Rennes F-35000, France.
Anim Reprod Sci. 2009 Jul;113(1-4):22-37. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
As oestrous expression of dairy cows has decreased over the last decades oestrus detection has become more difficult. The objective of this study is to identify the main factors that affect oestrus detection in seasonal calving dairy cows, and to establish their relative importance. In each of 5 years 36 Normande and 36 Holstein cows were assigned to a Low or High winter-feeding level group. Half of each group was then assigned to a Low or High pasture-feeding group. The Low-Low strategy resulted in the lowest milk yield and the greatest body condition (BC) loss from calving to nadir BC score (6302 kg; -0.98 unit). The High-High strategy had the converse effect (7549 kg; -0.75 units). Low-High and High-Low strategies had intermediate values. The Normande cows had lower milk yield and BC loss than Holstein cows (6153 kg versus 7620 kg; -0.82 unit versus -1.20 unit). A database of 415 observed spontaneous oestruses was created. Oestruses were classified according to detection signs: (1) standing to be mounted, (2) mounting without standing, (3) other signs without standing or mounting (slight signs). Presence of another cow in oestrus, access to pasture, Normande breed and Low-Low strategy increased standing detection. In the Normande breed, 97% of oestruses were detected by standing while combining the presence of a herdmate in oestrus and access to pasture with a milk production of less than 6550 kg. Holstein cows had a higher frequency of slight signs oestruses than Normande ones, which was associated with a decreased subsequent calving rate (P<0.05). In multiparous Holstein cows, the odds of slight signs detection was multiplied by 7.8 for the High-High group in comparison with the Low-Low group (P<0.05). In our study milk yield had an effect on oestrus detection which was not explained by BC loss. As High-High cows produced more milk than others, we logically found that an increase in milk yield increased slight signs detection. Conversely, as they lost less BC than others, BC loss improved the chance of standing or mounting detection. These two results show that an increase in milk yield may reduce oestrous behaviour even if BC loss is moderate. Oestrus detection is crucial in seasonal compact calving systems. High phenotypic milk yields appear unsuitable with such systems in regard to depressed oestrous behaviour.
在过去几十年里,奶牛的发情表现有所减少,发情检测变得更加困难。本研究的目的是确定影响季节性产犊奶牛发情检测的主要因素,并确定它们的相对重要性。在5年中的每一年,将36头诺曼底奶牛和36头荷斯坦奶牛分配到低或高冬季饲养水平组。然后将每组中的一半奶牛分配到低或高牧场饲养组。低-低策略导致产奶量最低,从产犊到最低体况(BC)评分期间体况损失最大(6302千克;-0.98单位)。高-高策略则产生相反的效果(7549千克;-0.75单位)。低-高和高-低策略的值介于两者之间。诺曼底奶牛的产奶量和体况损失低于荷斯坦奶牛(分别为6153千克和7620千克;-0.82单位和-1.20单位)。创建了一个包含415次观察到的自然发情的数据库。发情根据检测迹象进行分类:(1)站立接受爬跨,(2)不站立爬跨,(3)不站立或不爬跨的其他迹象(轻微迹象)。有另一头发情的奶牛、有牧场放牧机会、诺曼底品种和低-低策略增加了站立检测的概率。在诺曼底品种中,当结合有发情的同群奶牛、有牧场放牧机会且产奶量低于6550千克时,97%的发情是通过站立检测到的。荷斯坦奶牛出现轻微发情迹象的频率高于诺曼底奶牛,这与随后较低的产犊率相关(P<0.05)。在经产荷斯坦奶牛中,与低-低组相比,高-高组出现轻微迹象检测的几率增加了7.8倍(P<0.05)。在我们的研究中,产奶量对发情检测有影响,而体况损失无法解释这一影响。由于高-高组的奶牛产奶量高于其他组,我们合理地发现产奶量增加会增加轻微迹象的检测。相反,由于它们的体况损失比其他组少,体况损失增加了站立或爬跨检测的机会。这两个结果表明,即使体况损失适中,产奶量的增加也可能减少发情行为。在季节性紧凑产犊系统中,发情检测至关重要。就发情行为受抑制而言,高表型产奶量似乎不适用于此类系统。