Teagasc, Moorepark Dairy Production Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Mar;93(3):1283-95. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2407.
This study was conducted to determine whether extending the calving interval (CI) to 24 mo would be an alternative to culling and replacing cows that had failed to become pregnant. Forty-six nonpregnant lactating cows were assembled in November 2004 and assigned to receive either 3kg (low) or 6kg (high) of concentrate supplement and a basal diet of grass silage and maize silage over the winter period (13 wk). Cows returned to pasture in late March and received 1kg of concentrate/d until dry-off (milk yield <5 kg/d). Cumulative milk production was calculated from calving to the end of November 2004 (12-mo CI) and from the start of December 2004 until dry off in 2005 (extended lactation part of 24-mo CI). High winter feeding resulted in greater milk production over the winter confinement (20.0+/-0.3 vs. 17.8+/-0.3 kg/d for high and low winter feeding, respectively) and had a carryover effect during the remainder of the 24-mo CI period (5,177 vs. 4,686kg; SEM=173kg). At the end of the study, cows were ranked on cumulative milk solids and separated into 3 groups (R1, R2, and R3). During the 24-mo CI, milk yields were 7,287, 6,267, and 5,273kg (SEM=308kg) in yr 1, and 5,738, 4,836, and 4,266 (SEM=241kg) in yr 2 for R1, R2, and R3, respectively. Eighty-five percent of the cows became pregnant during the breeding season of yr 2, with a conception rate to first service of 52%. An economic analysis of different ranks with a 12-mo CI, a 24-mo CI, and an annualized herd effect, which compared an efficient spring calving system with 30% recycled cows in R1 and 10% recycled cows in R3, was carried out. Farm profit was reduced by 60% and 65% at a milk price of 22.3 euro-cents (c)/L with the corresponding values of 17% and 30% for a milk price of 30 c/L, respectively, when R1 and R3 systems were compared with an efficient spring milk (12-mo CI) production system. Within a spring system where 30% and 10% of R1 and R3 animals were subjected to extended lactations, the profit difference was reduced compared with an efficient spring system, The results indicated that lactations with a 24-mo CI may be a viable alternative to culling nonpregnant cows and be economically more suited to higher producing cows.
本研究旨在探讨延长产犊间隔(CI)至 24 个月是否可以替代淘汰未怀孕的奶牛。2004 年 11 月,将 46 头非妊娠泌乳奶牛组合在一起,并分配到接受 3kg(低)或 6kg(高)浓缩补充剂和基础牧草青贮和玉米青贮日粮的冬季组(13 周)。奶牛于 3 月底返回牧场,并在干奶前(产奶量<5kg/d)每天接受 1kg 浓缩饲料。从产犊到 2004 年 11 月底(12 个月 CI)计算累积产奶量,从 2004 年 12 月初开始至 2005 年干奶结束(24 个月 CI 的延长泌乳部分)。冬季高补饲导致冬季封闭期产奶量增加(高补饲分别为 20.0+/-0.3kg/d 和 17.8+/-0.3kg/d),并在 24 个月 CI 的其余时间产生了延续效应(5177kg 和 4686kg;SEM=173kg)。在研究结束时,根据累积奶固体对奶牛进行排名,并分为 3 组(R1、R2 和 R3)。在 24 个月 CI 期间,R1、R2 和 R3 在第 1 年的产奶量分别为 7287、6267 和 5273kg(SEM=308kg),第 2 年的产奶量分别为 5738、4836 和 4266kg(SEM=241kg)。85%的奶牛在第 2 年的配种季节怀孕,首次配种的受孕率为 52%。通过对不同等级进行经济分析,采用 12 个月 CI、24 个月 CI 和年度 herd 效应,比较了高效春季产犊系统与 R1 中的 30%回收奶牛和 R3 中的 10%回收奶牛,结果表明,当 R1 和 R3 系统与高效春季牛奶(12 个月 CI)生产系统相比时,在牛奶价格为 22.3 欧分(c)/L 时,农场利润分别减少了 60%和 65%,相应的牛奶价格为 30 c/L 时,农场利润分别减少了 17%和 30%。在 R1 和 R3 动物的 30%和 10%进行延长泌乳的春季系统中,与高效春季系统相比,利润差异减少。结果表明,24 个月 CI 的泌乳可能是淘汰未怀孕奶牛的可行替代方案,并且更适合高产奶牛。