Bern University of Applied Science, School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland.
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Aug;96(8):5352-63. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6444. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
The first objective of this study was to compare the productive and reproductive performance of Holstein-Friesian (CH HF), Fleckvieh (CH FV), and Brown Swiss (CH BS) cows of Swiss origin with New Zealand Holstein-Friesian (NZ HF) cows in pasture-based compact-calving systems; NZ HF cows were chosen as the reference population for such grazing systems. The second objective was to analyze the relationships within and between breeds regarding reproductive performance, milk yield, and body condition score (BCS) dynamics. On 15 commercial Swiss farms, NZ HF cows were paired with Swiss cows over 3 yr. Overall, the study involved 259 complete lactations from 134 cows: 131 from 58 NZ HF, 40 from 24 CH HF, 43 from 27 CH FV, and 45 from 25 CH BS cows. All production parameters were affected by cow breed. Milk and energy-corrected milk yield over 270 d of lactation differed by 1,000 kg between the 2 extreme groups; CH HF having the highest yield and CH BS the lowest. The NZ HF cows had the greatest milk fat and protein concentrations over the lactation and exhibited the highest lactation persistency. Body weight differed by 90 kg between extreme groups; NZ HF and CH BS being the lightest and CH HF and CH FV the heaviest. As a result, the 2 HF strains achieved the highest milk production efficiency (270-d energy-corrected milk/body weight(0.75)). Although less efficient at milk production, CH FV had a high 21-d submission rate (86%) and a high conception rate within 2 inseminations (89%), achieving high pregnancy rates within the first 3 and 6 wk of the breeding period (65 and 81%, respectively). Conversely, poorer reproductive performance was recorded for CH HF cows, with NZ HF and CH BS being intermediate. Both BCS at nadir and at 100 d postpartum had a positive effect on the 6-wk pregnancy rate, even when breed was included in the model. The BCS at 100 d of lactation also positively affected first service conception rate. In conclusion, despite their high milk production efficiency, even in low-input systems, CH HF were not suited to pasture-based seasonal-calving production systems due to poor reproductive performance. On the contrary, CH FV fulfilled the compact-calving reproduction objectives and deserve further consideration in seasonal calving systems, despite their lower milk production potential.
本研究的第一个目标是比较瑞士荷斯坦牛(CH HF)、弗莱维赫牛(CH FV)和瑞士褐牛(CH BS)与新西兰荷斯坦牛(NZ HF)在基于放牧的紧凑产犊系统中的生产性能和繁殖性能;选择 NZ HF 牛作为此类放牧系统的参考群体。第二个目标是分析品种内和品种间的繁殖性能、产奶量和体况评分(BCS)动态之间的关系。在 15 个商业瑞士农场中,NZ HF 牛与瑞士牛在 3 年的时间里进行了配对。总体而言,这项研究涉及 134 头奶牛的 259 次完整泌乳期:58 头 NZ HF 牛中有 131 头,24 头 CH HF 牛中有 40 头,27 头 CH FV 牛中有 43 头,25 头 CH BS 牛中有 45 头。所有生产参数均受牛品种影响。泌乳 270d 的牛奶和能量校正奶产量在两个极端组之间相差 1000kg;CH HF 产量最高,CH BS 产量最低。新西兰荷斯坦牛在整个泌乳期的牛奶脂肪和蛋白质浓度最高,泌乳持续性最高。体重在极端组之间相差 90kg;新西兰荷斯坦牛和瑞士褐牛最轻,而 CH HF 和 CH FV 最重。因此,2 个 HF 品系的牛奶生产效率最高(270d 能量校正奶/体重(0.75))。尽管产奶效率较低,但 CH FV 的 21d 配种率较高(86%),两次配种的受胎率较高(89%),在繁殖期的前 3 周和 6 周内实现了较高的妊娠率(分别为 65%和 81%)。相反,CH HF 牛的繁殖性能较差,而新西兰荷斯坦牛和瑞士褐牛则处于中等水平。哺乳期第 100 天和第 100 天的 BCS 对 6 周妊娠率有积极影响,即使在模型中包含了品种因素。哺乳期第 100 天的 BCS 也对首次服务受胎率有积极影响。总之,尽管 CH HF 的牛奶生产效率很高,即使在低投入系统中,由于繁殖性能不佳,它们也不适合基于放牧的季节性产犊生产系统。相反,CH FV 满足紧凑产犊繁殖目标,尽管其产奶潜力较低,但值得在季节性产犊系统中进一步考虑。