Wang Longhu, Chen Yangsheng, Song Yanting, Chen Yong, Liu Xuesong
College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
J Sep Sci. 2008 Oct;31(18):3238-45. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200800341.
In this paper, the volatile compounds of Schisandra chinensis obtained by different extraction techniques including supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), steam distillation (SD), Soxhlet extraction (SE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) were investigated for the first time. The sample preparation procedure for GC-MS analysis of the volatile compounds was optimized and then 37, 45, 27 and 37 compounds were identified in the samples obtained by SFE, SD, SE and UAE methods, respectively. As the therapeutic effect of the traditional Chinese medicine is usually based on multifarious essential components or the combination of them instead of only one component, the volatile compounds were compared in groups with the extracts by SE, SD and UAE. This would be more reasonable to evaluate the effects of an alternative technique to extracting multifarious essential components. Among the identified components in the SFE extract, 32 compounds were the same as that by three conventional methods, accounting for 90.5% of the volatile compounds identified. However, as the volatile compounds were classed into groups, it was easy to see that the Schisandra chinensis oil extracted by SFE was made up largely of aromatics and sesquiterpenoids (52.1 and 27.6%, respectively), with less amounts of monoterpenoids and other compounds, distinguishing SFE from the conventional extractions.
本文首次对采用超临界流体萃取(SFE)、水蒸气蒸馏(SD)、索氏提取(SE)和超声辅助提取(UAE)等不同提取技术获得的五味子挥发性成分进行了研究。对挥发性成分进行气相色谱 - 质谱分析的样品制备程序进行了优化,然后分别在通过SFE、SD、SE和UAE方法获得的样品中鉴定出37、45、27和37种化合物。由于中药的治疗效果通常基于多种有效成分或它们的组合,而非单一成分,因此将挥发性成分与通过SE、SD和UAE获得的提取物进行分组比较。这样评估一种提取多种有效成分的替代技术的效果会更合理。在SFE提取物中鉴定出的成分中,有32种化合物与三种传统方法相同,占鉴定出的挥发性化合物的90.5%。然而,当将挥发性成分分类时,可以很容易地看出,通过SFE提取的五味子油主要由芳烃和倍半萜类化合物组成(分别为52.1%和27.6%),单萜类化合物和其他化合物的含量较少,这使得SFE与传统提取方法有所区别。