Suppr超能文献

欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-PR25的一项国际实地研究:一份用于评估前列腺癌患者健康相关生活质量的问卷。

An international field study of the EORTC QLQ-PR25: a questionnaire for assessing the health-related quality of life of patients with prostate cancer.

作者信息

van Andel George, Bottomley Andrew, Fosså Sophie D, Efficace Fabio, Coens Corneel, Guerif Stephane, Kynaston Howard, Gontero Paolo, Thalmann George, Akdas Atif, D'Haese Sven, Aaronson Neil K

机构信息

Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2008 Nov;44(16):2418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.07.030. Epub 2008 Sep 5.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the psychometrics of the EORTC QLQ-PR25, a questionnaire assessing the health-related quality of life of prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

The QLQ-PR25 and the QLQ-C30 were administered to 642 prostate cancer patients from 13 countries treated with curative or palliative intent. The QLQ-PR25 assesses urinary, bowel and sexual symptoms and functioning, and the side-effects of hormonal treatment.

RESULTS

Five hundred and nine patients were available for the final analysis. Multitrait scaling analyses confirmed the hypothesised scale structure of the QLQ-PR25. Internal consistency reliability was good (coefficient alpha=0.70-0.86) for the urinary symptoms and sexual function scales, but lower for the bowel function and side-effects of hormonal treatment scales (alpha<0.70). The module discriminated clearly between clinically distinct patient subgroups, and was responsive to changes in health status over time.

CONCLUSION

In general, the QLQ-PR25 demonstrates acceptable psychometric properties and clinical validity. Some caution should be used in interpreting the bowel function and side-effects of hormonal therapy scales; results can be reported at the individual item and scale level.

摘要

目的

评估欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织前列腺癌生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-PR25)的心理测量学特性,该问卷用于评估前列腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量。

方法

对来自13个国家的642例接受根治性或姑息性治疗的前列腺癌患者进行QLQ-PR25和QLQ-C30问卷调查。QLQ-PR25评估泌尿、肠道和性功能及症状,以及激素治疗的副作用。

结果

509例患者纳入最终分析。多特质量表分析证实了QLQ-PR25的假设量表结构。泌尿症状和性功能量表的内部一致性信度良好(α系数=0.70-0.86),但肠道功能和激素治疗副作用量表的内部一致性信度较低(α<0.70)。该模块能清晰区分不同临床特征的患者亚组,且能反映健康状况随时间的变化。

结论

总体而言,QLQ-PR25具有可接受的心理测量学特性和临床效度。在解释肠道功能和激素治疗副作用量表时应谨慎;结果可在单个条目和量表层面报告。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验