• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子病历与实际门诊用药之间差异的来源及类型

Sources and types of discrepancies between electronic medical records and actual outpatient medication use.

作者信息

Orrico Kathleen B

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco, School of Pharmacy, USA.

出版信息

J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Sep;14(7):626-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.7.626.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.7.626
PMID:18774872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10437703/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accuracy and transportability of the recorded outpatient medication list are important in the continuum of patient care. Classifying discrepancies between the electronic medical record (EMR) and actual drug use by the root cause of discrepancy (either system generated or patient generated) would guide quality improvement initiatives.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify and categorize the number and type of medication discrepancies that exist between the medication lists recorded in EMRs and the comprehensive medication histories obtained through telephone interviews conducted by a team of nurses providing advice to health plan members at the Palo Alto Medical Foundation in Palo Alto, California.

METHODS

The study was conducted as a retrospective comparison of EMR medication lists with information obtained by patient interview. Interview data were obtained by a review of telephone calls made to a nurse advice line by health plan members seeking information about sinusitis, urinary tract infection, acute conjunctivitis, pharyngitis, emergency contraception, or mastitis. As part of the advice protocol, a medication reconciliation process was conducted between July 1 and December 31, 2006. Changes to the medication list made during the telephone visit were extracted, categorized, and evaluated by the study's principal investigator. Data extraction included the number and type of identified medication discrepancies, patient age, gender, and condition that prompted the telephone contact. A modified version of the Medication Discrepancy Tool (MDT) was used to categorize medication discrepancies as either system generated (e.g., failure of the provider to update a medication list) or patient generated (e.g., failure of the patient to report use of an over-the-counter product).

RESULTS

A total of 233 discrepancies were identified from 85 medication reconciliation phone visits, averaging 2.7 per medication list. The most common type of discrepancy was a medication recorded in the EMR but no longer being used by the patient (n=164, 70.4%), followed by omission from the EMR of a medication being taken by the patient (n=36, 15.5%). 79.8% (n=186) of the discrepancies were attributed to system-generated factors, whereas 20.2% (n=47) were patient generated. Approximately half (n=118, 50.6%) of the discrepancies fell into 4 broad American Hospital Formulary System therapeutic classifications: anti-infective agents (14.2%), anti-inflammatory agents (14.2%), analgesics (12.4%), and vitamins (9.9%). The most common patient-generated discrepancy was omission of a multivitamin (n=13, 27.7%), and the most common system-generated prescription drug discrepancy was expired entry for the intranasal corticosteroid mometasone furoate (n=12, 6.5%).

CONCLUSION

Discrepancies in the outpatient setting were common and predominantly system generated. The most common discrepancy was the presence in the EMR of a medication no longer being taken by the patient. Adding foreseeable end dates to prescription drug orders at computerized order entry might be considered in an effort to improve the accuracy of the outpatient medication list. Reliable systems to involve patients in routinely reconciling EMRs with actual medication use may also warrant examination. The MDT methodology served as a useful qualitative guide for evaluating discrepancies and developing targeted means for resolution.

摘要

背景

记录的门诊用药清单的准确性和可传输性在患者连续护理中很重要。根据差异的根本原因(系统产生或患者产生)对电子病历(EMR)与实际用药情况之间的差异进行分类,将有助于指导质量改进措施。

目的

量化并分类电子病历中记录的用药清单与通过电话访谈获得的全面用药史之间存在的用药差异的数量和类型,这些电话访谈由一组护士进行,他们为加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托市帕洛阿尔托医疗基金会的健康计划成员提供建议。

方法

该研究是对电子病历用药清单与通过患者访谈获得的信息进行回顾性比较。访谈数据通过审查健康计划成员打给护士咨询热线的电话获得,这些成员寻求有关鼻窦炎、尿路感染、急性结膜炎、咽炎、紧急避孕或乳腺炎的信息。作为咨询方案的一部分,在2006年7月1日至12月31日期间进行了用药核对过程。研究的主要研究者提取、分类并评估了电话问诊期间用药清单的变化。数据提取包括已识别用药差异的数量和类型、患者年龄、性别以及促使电话联系的病情。使用改良版的用药差异工具(MDT)将用药差异分类为系统产生的(例如,提供者未更新用药清单)或患者产生的(例如,患者未报告使用非处方药产品)。

结果

从85次用药核对电话问诊中共识别出233处差异,平均每份用药清单有2.7处差异。最常见的差异类型是电子病历中记录的药物患者不再使用(n = 164,70.4%),其次是患者正在服用的药物未记录在电子病历中(n = 36,15.5%)。79.8%(n = 186)的差异归因于系统产生的因素,而20.2%(n = 47)是患者产生的。大约一半(n = 118,50.6%)的差异属于美国医院药品 formulary 系统的4大类治疗分类:抗感染药(14.2%)、抗炎药(14.2%)、镇痛药(12.4%)和维生素(9.9%)。最常见的患者产生的差异是未服用多种维生素(n = 13,27.7%),最常见的系统产生的处方药差异是鼻用皮质类固醇糠酸莫米松的条目过期(n = 12,6.5%)。

结论

门诊环境中的差异很常见,且主要是系统产生的。最常见的差异是电子病历中存在患者不再服用的药物。为提高门诊用药清单的准确性,可考虑在计算机化医嘱录入时为处方药订单添加可预见的截止日期。还可能需要审查让患者常规参与使电子病历与实际用药情况相核对的可靠系统。MDT方法是评估差异和制定有针对性解决方法的有用定性指南。

相似文献

1
Sources and types of discrepancies between electronic medical records and actual outpatient medication use.电子病历与实际门诊用药之间差异的来源及类型
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Sep;14(7):626-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.7.626.
2
Accuracy of Electronic Medical Record Medication Reconciliation in Emergency Department Patients.急诊科患者电子病历用药核对的准确性
J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.052. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The accuracy of medication data in an outpatient electronic medical record.门诊电子病历中用药数据的准确性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996 May-Jun;3(3):234-44. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1996.96310637.
5
Discrepancies Identified Through a Telephone-Based, Student-Led Initiative for Medication Reconciliation in Ambulatory Psychiatry.通过一项以电话为基础、由学生主导的门诊精神病学药物重整计划发现的差异
J Pharm Pract. 2018 Jun;31(3):304-311. doi: 10.1177/0897190017715391. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
6
Medication reconciliation by clinical pharmacists in an outpatient family medicine clinic.门诊家庭医学诊所中临床药师进行的用药核对
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2014 Mar-Apr;54(2):181-7. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2014.12230.
7
Student pharmacist initiated medication reconciliation in the outpatient setting.学生药剂师在门诊环境中开展了用药核对工作。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2012 Apr;10(2):78-82. doi: 10.4321/s1886-36552012000200003. Epub 2012 Jun 30.
8
Considerations for using the 'brown bag' strategy to reconcile medications during routine outpatient office visits.在常规门诊就诊期间使用“棕色袋子”策略核对药物的注意事项。
Qual Prim Care. 2014;22(4):177-87.
9
Medication discrepancies in integrated electronic health records.整合电子健康记录中的用药差异。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):103-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001301. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
10
Evaluation of outpatient medication reconciliation involving student pharmacists at a comprehensive cancer center.在一家综合癌症中心对涉及学生药剂师的门诊用药重整进行评估。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2015 Sep-Oct;55(5):540-5. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2015.14214.

引用本文的文献

1
Agreement between Patient-reported Pain Medication Use and Electronic Medical Record Data in Surgical Amputation Patients.手术截肢患者自我报告的止痛药物使用情况与电子病历数据之间的一致性
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):e5415. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005415. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Antiparkinsonian Medication Reconciliation as a Strategy to Improve Safety by Preventing Medication Errors.抗帕金森病药物核对作为一种通过预防用药错误来提高安全性的策略。
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2023 May 23;10(7):1090-1098. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13789. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Pharmacist-provider collaborative visits after hospital discharge in a comprehensive acute kidney injury survivor model.药师-提供者协作访视在综合急性肾损伤幸存者模型中的应用。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023 May-Jun;63(3):909-914. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.12.029. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
4
Extraction of Active Medications and Adherence Using Natural Language Processing for Glaucoma Patients.利用自然语言处理从青光眼患者中提取活性药物和用药依从性。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:773-782. eCollection 2021.
5
Accuracy of an electronic prescribing system for standard treatments.标准治疗电子处方系统的准确性。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2023 Jul;30(4):232-236. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-002909. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
6
Inflammatory bowel disease patients provide reliable self-reported medical information: A multicentre prospective pharmacovigilance monitoring system.炎症性肠病患者能提供可靠的自我报告医疗信息:一项多中心前瞻性药物警戒监测系统。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Apr;30(4):520-524. doi: 10.1002/pds.5175. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
7
Medication histories documentation at the community pharmacy setting: A study from Jordan.社区药店用药史记录:来自约旦的一项研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 22;14(10):e0224124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224124. eCollection 2019.
8
Effect of Postdismissal Pharmacist Visits for Patients Using High-Risk Medications.药师对使用高风险药物患者出院后随访的效果
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2018 Feb 1;2(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2017.12.004. eCollection 2018 Mar.
9
Implementation of a Medication Reconciliation Assistive Technology: A Qualitative Analysis.药物重整辅助技术的实施:一项定性分析
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:1802-1811. eCollection 2017.
10
Evaluation of Multimedia Medication Reconciliation Software: A Randomized Controlled, Single-Blind Trial to Measure Diagnostic Accuracy for Discrepancy Detection.多媒体用药核对软件评估:一项旨在测量差异检测诊断准确性的随机对照、单盲试验。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Apr;9(2):285-301. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1645889. Epub 2018 May 2.