Suppr超能文献

颈动脉狭窄的超声成像:将放射学会超声共识标准应用于单一机构的临床实践

Ultrasound imaging of carotid artery stenosis: application of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Criteria to a Single Institution Clinical Practice.

作者信息

Braun Ryan M, Bertino Raymond E, Milbrandt Joseph, Bray Macey

机构信息

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.

出版信息

Ultrasound Q. 2008 Sep;24(3):161-6. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31818625b6.

Abstract

Carotid duplex Doppler ultrasound (CDDU) is increasingly used for the evaluation of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. In CDDU, velocity measurements are used to estimate the degree of ICA stenosis. Traditionally, radiologists have relied on institutional experience and published research when interpreting CDDU. In 2003, a consensus committee of experts convened as the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Committee and proposed standard criteria for grading ICA stenosis including the use of peak systolic velocity (PSV) of greater than 230 cm/s for assigning ICA stenosis of greater than 70%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Criteria in classifying carotid stenoses. This study shows the following: (1) that the criterion of PSV of greater than 230 cm/s for angiographic stenosis of greater than 70% performs as predicted by the consensus committee, with sensitivity of 95.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-0.99) and specificity of 84.4% (95% CI, 0.80-0.88); (2) using Pearson correlations, there is no statistical difference found between the correlation of PSV with angiography (0.825 [95% CI, 0.792-0.853]), end diastolic velocity with angiography (0.762 [95% CI, 0.718-0.799]), and the ICA/common carotid artery (CCA) systolic ratio with angiography (0.766 [95% CI, 0.723-0.802]). The correlation of the ICA/CCA diastolic ratio with angiography (0.643 [95% CI, 0.584-0.696]) is less predictive at a 95% confidence interval than the other 3 velocity-based variables, and (3) when the 4 velocity-based variables are taken in pairs (eg, PSV and end diastolic velocity), there is no pair that shows statistically significant improvement in performance. Peak systolic velocity in combination with other variables does show a slight trend toward superior performance.

摘要

颈动脉双功能多普勒超声(CDDU)越来越多地用于评估颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄。在CDDU中,速度测量用于估计ICA狭窄程度。传统上,放射科医生在解读CDDU时依赖机构经验和已发表的研究。2003年,一个专家共识委员会作为超声放射学会共识委员会召开会议,并提出了分级ICA狭窄的标准,包括使用大于230 cm/s的收缩期峰值速度(PSV)来判定大于70%的ICA狭窄。本研究的目的是评估超声放射学会共识标准在颈动脉狭窄分类中的准确性。本研究显示如下结果:(1)对于血管造影显示大于70%的狭窄,PSV大于230 cm/s这一标准的表现与共识委员会的预测一致,敏感性为95.3%(95%置信区间[CI],0.89 - 0.99),特异性为84.4%(95% CI,0.80 - 0.88);(2)使用Pearson相关性分析,PSV与血管造影的相关性(0.825 [95% CI,0.792 - 0.853])、舒张末期速度与血管造影的相关性(0.762 [95% CI,0.718 - 0.799])以及ICA/颈总动脉(CCA)收缩期比值与血管造影的相关性(0.766 [95% CI,0.723 - 0.802])之间未发现统计学差异。ICA/CCA舒张期比值与血管造影的相关性(0.643 [95% CI,0.584 - 0.696])在95%置信区间内的预测性低于其他3个基于速度的变量,并且(3)当将4个基于速度的变量成对考虑(例如,PSV和舒张末期速度)时,没有一对变量在性能上显示出统计学上的显著改善。收缩期峰值速度与其他变量结合确实显示出性能略有提升的趋势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验