Grant Edward G, Benson Carol B, Moneta Gregory L, Alexandrov Andrei V, Baker J Dennis, Bluth Edward I, Carroll Barbara A, Eliasziw Michael, Gocke John, Hertzberg Barbara S, Katarick Sandra, Needleman Laurence, Pellerito John, Polak Joseph F, Rholl Kenneth S, Wooster Douglas L, Zierler Eugene
Department of Radiology, University of Southern California (USC), Keck School of Medicine, USC University Hospital, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Ultrasound Q. 2003 Dec;19(4):190-8. doi: 10.1097/00013644-200312000-00005.
The Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts in the field of vascular ultrasonography (US) to come to a consensus regarding Doppler US for assistance in the diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. The panel's consensus statement is believed to represent a reasonable position on the basis of analysis of available literature and panelists' experience. Key elements of the statement include the following: First, all internal carotid artery (ICA) examinations should be performed with grayscale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler US. Second, the degree of stenosis determined at grayscale and Doppler US should be stratified into the categories of normal (no stenosis), less than 50% stenosis, 50 to 69% stenosis, > or =70% stenosis to near occlusion, near occlusion, and total occlusion. Third, ICA peak systolic velocity (PSV) and the presence of plaque on grayscale and/or color Doppler images are primarily used in the diagnosis and grading of ICA stenosis. Two additional parameters (the ICA-to-common carotid artery PSV ratio and ICA end diastolic velocity) may also be used when clinical or technical factors raise concern that ICA PSV may not be representative of the extent of disease. Fourth, ICA should be diagnosed as normal when ICA PSV is less than 125 cm/second and no plaque or intimal thickening is visible, less than 50% stenosis when ICA PSV is less than 125 cm/second and plaque or intimal thickening is visible, 50 to 69% stenosis when ICA PSV is 125 to 230 cm/second and plaque is visible, > or =70% stenosis to near occlusion when ICA PSV is more than 230 cm/second and visible plaque and lumen narrowing are seen, near occlusion when there is a markedly narrowed lumen on color Doppler US, and total occlusion when there is no detectable patent lumen on grayscale US and no flow on spectral, power, and color Doppler US. Fifth, the final report should discuss velocity measurements and grayscale and color Doppler findings. Study limitations should be noted when they exist. The conclusion should state an estimated degree of ICA stenosis as reflected in these categories. The panel also considered various technical aspects of carotid US and methods for quality assessment, and identified several important unanswered questions meriting future research.
超声放射学会召集了血管超声领域的多学科专家小组,就多普勒超声在颈动脉狭窄诊断中的应用达成共识。基于对现有文献的分析和小组成员的经验,该小组的共识声明被认为代表了一个合理的立场。声明的关键要素如下:第一,所有颈内动脉(ICA)检查均应使用灰阶、彩色多普勒和频谱多普勒超声进行。第二,在灰阶和多普勒超声下确定的狭窄程度应分为正常(无狭窄)、狭窄小于50%、狭窄50%至69%、狭窄≥70%至接近闭塞、接近闭塞和完全闭塞等类别。第三,ICA峰值收缩速度(PSV)以及灰阶和/或彩色多普勒图像上斑块的存在主要用于ICA狭窄的诊断和分级。当临床或技术因素引起对ICA PSV可能无法代表疾病程度的担忧时,也可使用另外两个参数(ICA与颈总动脉PSV比值和ICA舒张末期速度)。第四,当ICA PSV小于125 cm/秒且未见斑块或内膜增厚时,ICA应诊断为正常;当ICA PSV小于125 cm/秒且可见斑块或内膜增厚时,狭窄小于50%;当ICA PSV为125至230 cm/秒且可见斑块时,狭窄50%至69%;当ICA PSV大于230 cm/秒且可见斑块和管腔狭窄时,狭窄≥70%至接近闭塞;当彩色多普勒超声显示管腔明显狭窄时,为接近闭塞;当灰阶超声未检测到开放管腔且频谱、能量和彩色多普勒超声无血流时,为完全闭塞。第五,最终报告应讨论速度测量以及灰阶和彩色多普勒检查结果。存在研究局限性时应予以说明。结论应说明这些类别中反映的ICA狭窄估计程度。该小组还考虑了颈动脉超声的各种技术方面和质量评估方法,并确定了几个值得未来研究的重要未解决问题。