Pezzillo F, Di Matteo R, Liuzza F, Visci F, Callà C, Rosa M A, Maccauro G
Department of Orthopaedic Science and Traumatology, Catholic University "Sacro Cuore", Rome.
Clin Ter. 2008 Jul-Aug;159(4):265-8.
Authors describe two cases of bone lesions ("brown" tumour) secondary to hyperparathyroidism in whom incisional biopsy gave an incorrect diagnosis. The first case was a patient with a lesion of the right femur diagnosed as aneurismal cyst and; the second case was a patient with an isolated lesion of the distal metaphysic of right humerus firstly diagnosed as giant cells tumour. Treatment of the first case was resection and diaphyseal spacer, and the correct diagnosis of brown tumour was performed for the multiple tibial localizations appeared six months later. The second case was diagnosed as affected by a brown tumour secondary to hyperparathyroidism on the basis of clinical history and laboratory analysis. Both diagnoses were firstly incorrect and would have brought to an inadequate treatment with consequences on patients quality life. Differential diagnosis is discussed and the importance to evaluate all the diagnostic data to formulate a correct diagnosis is stressed.
作者描述了两例继发于甲状旁腺功能亢进的骨病变(“棕色”瘤)病例,其中切开活检给出了错误诊断。第一例是一名右股骨病变患者,最初被诊断为动脉瘤样骨囊肿;第二例是一名右肱骨远端干骺端孤立性病变患者,最初被诊断为巨细胞瘤。第一例的治疗是切除并植入骨干间隔物,6个月后因出现多个胫骨部位病变而确诊为棕色瘤。第二例根据临床病史和实验室分析被诊断为继发于甲状旁腺功能亢进的棕色瘤。这两个诊断最初都是错误的,会导致治疗不当,影响患者生活质量。文中讨论了鉴别诊断,并强调了评估所有诊断数据以做出正确诊断的重要性。