Chapela M J, Reboreda A, Vieites J M, Cabado A G
ANFACO-CECOPESCA, Col Univ 16, 36310 Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
J Agric Food Chem. 2008 Oct 8;56(19):8979-86. doi: 10.1021/jf801572j. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
The search for alternative methods to the mouse bioassay (MBA) has intensified over recent years. The present work analyzes seven different species of shellfish (clams, small scallops, small clams, mussels, oysters, cockles, and edible whelks) in fresh, frozen boiled, and canned presentations using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and the results are compared with the same samples analyzed through MBA. The toxins studied were OA, DTX1, DTX2, YTX, PTX2, and AZA1, which are legislated in the EU, and SPX1, which is not regulated yet. Consistent results between LC-MS/MS and MBA were found in 69% of the samples, whereas 26% of MBA showed "false-positive" results with respect to the toxins analyzed. No "false negatives" were observed. The possibility of LC-MS/MS as an alternative or complementary technique to MBA is discussed.
近年来,寻找小鼠生物测定法(MBA)替代方法的工作日益加强。本研究使用液相色谱 - 质谱联用仪(LC-MS/MS)分析了七种不同种类的贝类(蛤蜊、小扇贝、小蛤、贻贝、牡蛎、鸟蛤和食用蛾螺)的新鲜、冷冻煮熟和罐装样品,并将结果与通过MBA分析的相同样品进行比较。所研究的毒素包括欧盟立法规定的OA、DTX1、DTX2、YTX、PTX2和AZA1,以及尚未受到监管的SPX1。在69%的样品中发现LC-MS/MS和MBA的结果一致,而26%的MBA分析结果相对于所分析的毒素显示为“假阳性”。未观察到“假阴性”。本文讨论了LC-MS/MS作为MBA替代或补充技术的可能性。