• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Attitudes of psychiatric patients and their relatives to involuntary treatment.

作者信息

Adams N H, Hafner R J

机构信息

Glenside Hospital, Eastwood, SA.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1991 Jun;25(2):231-7. doi: 10.1080/00048679109077739.

DOI:10.1080/00048679109077739
PMID:1877959
Abstract

In 1979 a Guardianship Board assumed responsibility in South Australia for the welfare of those mentally ill or handicapped people unable to look after their own health or safety, or to manage their own affairs. This study examines the attitudes to guardianship and involuntary treatment of 79 patients referred to the Board from a psychiatric hospital, all of whom were under guardianship at the time of the study. Forty-seven of their relatives took part in the project, which included measures of patients' psychiatric symptoms and relatives' punitiveness. Although almost 70% of patients objected to Guardianship in principle, they made more positive than negative statements about it. Nearly 60% rated involuntary treatment, including medication, as helpful. Patients reported a level of psychiatric symptoms less than half of that of a psychiatric outpatient sample. Relatives were strongly in favour of Guardianship, stating frequently that it allowed an improved relationship between themselves and the patient. Patients who believed that they were suffering from a mental illness were comparatively happy about being under Guardianship, and a belief that the patient was mentally ill was significantly associated with reduced extrapunitiveness in relatives.

摘要

相似文献

1
Attitudes of psychiatric patients and their relatives to involuntary treatment.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1991 Jun;25(2):231-7. doi: 10.1080/00048679109077739.
2
The psychiatrist as legal guardian.
Am J Psychiatry. 1988 May;145(5):600-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.5.600.
3
Involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation - differences and similarities between patients detained under the mental health act and according to the legal guardianship legislation.非自愿住院治疗——依据《精神健康法》被拘留的患者与依据法定监护立法被拘留的患者之间的异同。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05892-z.
4
Effects of the Jamison-Farabee consent decree: due process protection for involuntary psychiatric patients treated with psychoactive medication.贾米森 - 法拉比同意令的影响:对接受精神活性药物治疗的非自愿精神病患者的正当程序保护。
Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Feb;144(2):188-92. doi: 10.1176/ajp.144.2.188.
5
[Involuntary hospitalisations in accordance with guardianship law during eight years tripled].
Psychiatr Prax. 2003 Apr;30(3):108-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38600.
6
Mental health law: an idea whose time has passed.精神卫生法:一个已过时的理念。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1994 Dec;28(4):560-5. doi: 10.1080/00048679409080779.
7
Are the rights of people with mental illness still important?患有精神疾病者的权利仍然重要吗?
Soc Work. 1994 Mar;39(2):167-75.
8
[What is a "Considerable Damage to One's Health" in the Sense of German Guardianship Law?].[从德国监护法的意义上讲,什么是“对健康的严重损害”?]
Psychiatr Prax. 2016 Oct;43(7):395-399. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-116649. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
9
Attitudes towards psychiatric hospitalisation: a comparison of involuntary and voluntary patients.对精神病住院治疗的态度:非自愿和自愿住院患者的比较。
Aust Clin Rev. 1988 Sep;8(30):108-16.
10
Medical and social paternalism. Regulation of and attitudes towards compulsory psychiatric care.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993 Dec;88(6):415-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03483.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of medication refusal by Indian caregivers: A revisit after 2 decades.印度护理人员对药物拒绝的处理:二十年后的重新审视。
Indian J Psychiatry. 2022 Sep-Oct;64(5):525-528. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_973_21. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
2
Experiences with legally mandated treatment in patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review of qualitative studies.精神分裂症患者依法强制治疗的体验:定性研究的系统综述。
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 May 14;63(1):e39. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.37.
3
WPA guidance on how to combat stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists.
WPA 关于如何消除精神医学和精神科医生污名化的指导意见。
World Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;9(3):131-44. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00296.x.