• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HEDIS 绩效衡量标准对医疗质量的潜在影响。

The potential effects of HEDIS performance measures on the quality of care.

机构信息

Archimedes Inc., San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Sep-Oct;27(5):1429-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.1429.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.1429
PMID:18780934
Abstract

We analyzed the potential effects of different levels of performance on eight Health Care Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures for cardiovascular disease and diabetes during 1995-2005. The measures targeted 3.3 million (25 percent) heart attacks. Improvements in performance to those achieved by the median plan in 2005 imply prevention of 1.9 million myocardial infarctions (MIs, 15 percent), 0.8 million strokes (8 percent), and 0.1 million cases of end-stage renal disease (17 percent). If performance had been 100 percent, 1.4 million more MIs would have been prevented. Control of blood pressure has the largest potential effect on quality at the national level.

摘要

我们分析了 1995 年至 2005 年期间,8 项医疗保健雇主数据和信息集(HEDIS)心血管疾病和糖尿病衡量指标中不同绩效水平的潜在影响。这些衡量指标针对的是 330 万(25%)例心脏病发作。2005 年,与中位数计划相比,绩效的提高意味着可预防 190 万例心肌梗死(MI,15%)、80 万例中风(8%)和 10 万例终末期肾病(17%)。如果绩效达到 100%,则可预防多 140 万例 MI。在全国范围内,控制血压对质量的潜在影响最大。

相似文献

1
The potential effects of HEDIS performance measures on the quality of care.HEDIS 绩效衡量标准对医疗质量的潜在影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Sep-Oct;27(5):1429-41. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.1429.
2
Association of Health Plans' Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) performance with outcomes of enrollees with diabetes.健康计划协会的医疗保健效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)绩效与糖尿病患者的结局相关。
Med Care. 2010 Mar;48(3):217-23. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ca3fe6.
3
Managed care organizations publicly reporting three years of HEDIS measures.管理式医疗组织公开报告三年的医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)指标。
Manag Care Interface. 2001 Sep;14(9):50-4.
4
HEDIS (Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set) 2.0 to provide standard performance data for health plans.
QRC Advis. 1993 Jul;9(9):6-7.
5
Choosing chronic disease measures for HEDIS: conceptual framework and review of seven clinical areas.为医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)选择慢性病衡量指标:概念框架及七个临床领域综述
Manag Care Q. 1996 Summer;4(3):54-77.
6
Medicaid plan, health centers reveal secrets to boosting HEDIS scores, quality of care.
Public Sect Contract Rep. 1999 Jul;5(7):104-8.
7
Physician performance assessment: nonequivalence of primary care measures.医生绩效评估:初级保健措施的非等效性
Med Care. 2003 Sep;41(9):1034-47. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000083745.83803.D6.
8
HEDIS 3.0 advances health plan accountability.医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)3.0提升了健康计划的问责制。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1997 May;51(5):48, 50, 52.
9
New HEDIS means more information about HMOs.新的医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)意味着能获取更多有关健康维护组织(HMOs)的信息。
J Health Care Finance. 1997 Summer;23(4):40-50.
10
Gender disparities in cardiovascular disease care among commercial and medicare managed care plans.商业医保和联邦医疗保险管理式医疗计划中心血管疾病护理方面的性别差异。
Womens Health Issues. 2007 May-Jun;17(3):139-49. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2007.03.004. Epub 2007 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of patient health outcomes of a student-run free clinic in East Harlem.东哈莱姆区学生经营的免费诊所患者健康结果评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 21;24(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05070-5.
2
Medical assistant health coaching ("MAC") for type 2 diabetes in diverse primary care settings: A pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial protocol.医学助理健康辅导(“MAC”)在多样化初级保健环境中用于 2 型糖尿病:一项实用、群组随机对照试验方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jan;100:106164. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106164. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
3
Care Team Integration in Primary Care Improves One-Year Clinical and Financial Outcomes in Diabetes: A Case for Value-Based Care.
初级保健中的护理团队整合可改善糖尿病的一年临床和财务结果:重视价值的医疗保健的一个案例。
Popul Health Manag. 2020 Dec;23(6):467-475. doi: 10.1089/pop.2019.0103. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
4
Making Inroads in Addressing Population Health in Underserved Communities With Type 2 Diabetes.在服务不足社区应对2型糖尿病患者群体健康问题方面取得进展。
Diabetes Spectr. 2019 Nov;32(4):303-311. doi: 10.2337/ds19-0010.
5
Albuminuria Testing by Race and Ethnicity among Patients with Hypertension with and without Diabetes.高血压伴或不伴糖尿病患者的种族和民族白蛋白尿检测。
Am J Nephrol. 2019;50(1):48-54. doi: 10.1159/000500706. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
6
Using Clinical Data Standards to Measure Quality: A New Approach.利用临床数据标准衡量质量:一种新方法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Apr;9(2):422-431. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1656548. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
7
Health-weighted Composite Quality Metrics Offer Promise to Improve Health Outcomes in a Learning Health System.健康加权综合质量指标有望改善学习型健康系统中的健康结果。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013 Oct 28;1(2):1022. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1022. eCollection 2013.
8
Use of IndiGO individualized clinical guidelines in primary care.在基层医疗中使用 IndiGO 个体化临床指南。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):432-7. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001595. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
9
The impact of decision aids to enhance shared decision making for diabetes (the DAD study): protocol of a cluster randomized trial.决策辅助工具对促进糖尿病患者共同决策的影响(DAD 研究):一项群组随机试验方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 May 28;12:130. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-130.
10
Cost implications of improving blood pressure management among U.S. adults.改善美国成年人血压管理的成本影响。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug;46(4):1124-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01239.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.