Lehmann K A, Grond S, Freier J, Zech D
Department of Anesthesiology, Strädtische Kliniken Frankfurt, Höchst, Germany.
J Clin Anesth. 1991 May-Jun;3(3):194-201. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(91)90158-j.
To compare the analgesic efficacy of fentanyl, buprenorphine, and piritramide and to define the respiratory risk during conventional postoperative pain management and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).
Randomized, single-blind study.
Department of anesthesiology of an urban hospital.
Sixty patients (ASA) physical status II and III) recovering from unilateral thoracotomy performed under standardized general anesthesia including intercostal blockade.
Patients were treated with intramuscular (IM) piritramide (7.5 to 15 mg as needed) or intravenous (IV) PCA with fentanyl (demand dose 34 micrograms) or buprenorphine (demand dose 80 micrograms) during the early postoperative period, using the On-Demand Analgesia Computer (ODAC, Janssen Scientific Instruments, Beerse, Belgium).
The mean postoperative observation period was 24 to 25 hours. During this time, patients requested 55.8 +/- 23.2 mg of piritramide, 1.04 +/- 0.54 mg of fentanyl, or 1.81 +/- 0.78 mg of buprenorphine. Analgesia in all groups was judged mostly good to excellent, with a preference for PCA. Side effects were only of minor intensity in all groups; euphoria or dysphoria occurred only with buprenorphine. Two patients using PCA and five patients having IM analgesia developed short periods of respiratory depression (respiratory rate less than or equal to 8 breaths/minute and/or oxygen (O2) desaturation less than or equal to 90%), which promptly responded to commands to breathe deeply. Respiration rates did not differ, and frequent arterial blood sampling showed normal mean partial pressures of oxygen (PO2) and carbon dioxide (PCO2) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) in all subgroups.
Opioid-induced respiratory depression occurred infrequently during postoperative pain management whether by conventional means or using PCA, even though high doses of opioid analgesics were required intermittently for adequate postoperative pain relief by either technique.
比较芬太尼、丁丙诺啡和匹利卡明的镇痛效果,并确定传统术后疼痛管理和患者自控镇痛(PCA)期间的呼吸风险。
随机单盲研究。
城市医院麻醉科。
60例(ASA身体状况II和III级)在包括肋间阻滞的标准化全身麻醉下接受单侧开胸手术的患者,术后正在恢复。
术后早期,患者使用按需镇痛计算机(ODAC,杨森科学仪器公司,比利时贝尔瑟),接受肌肉注射(IM)匹利卡明(按需7.5至15毫克)或静脉注射(IV)PCA,分别使用芬太尼(按需剂量34微克)或丁丙诺啡(按需剂量80微克)。
术后平均观察期为24至25小时。在此期间,患者分别需要55.8±23.2毫克匹利卡明、1.04±0.54毫克芬太尼或1.81±0.78毫克丁丙诺啡。所有组的镇痛效果大多被判定为良好至优秀,患者更倾向于PCA。所有组的副作用均较轻;仅丁丙诺啡出现欣快感或烦躁不安。两名使用PCA的患者和五名接受IM镇痛的患者出现了短时间的呼吸抑制(呼吸频率小于或等于8次/分钟和/或氧(O2)饱和度小于或等于90%),对深呼吸指令反应迅速。呼吸频率无差异,频繁的动脉血采样显示所有亚组的平均动脉血氧分压(PO2)、二氧化碳分压(PCO2)和动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)均正常。
术后疼痛管理期间,无论是采用传统方法还是PCA,阿片类药物引起的呼吸抑制均很少发生,尽管两种技术都需要间歇性使用高剂量阿片类镇痛药才能充分缓解术后疼痛。