Kay E J, Baba S P
Department of Oral Medicine and Pathology, University of Glasgow, Scotland.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1991 Spring;15(3):195-8.
In the past, many school based dental health education programs have appeared to fail to bring about changes in children's behavior or measureable improvements in oral health. The reasons why this has been so are not always clear, but part of the explanation may be that inadequate attention has been paid to the research preceding the development of the dental health education materials used in the programs. This paper describes a rational planning cycle for evaluation research, which includes problem definition research, planning research, audience pre-testing and post-production audience testing for acceptability. Further stages involve post-dissemination evaluation, which include measures of effectiveness and implementation, but this paper argues that the four phases described above constitute a logical means of providing target groups with appropriate, acceptable and efficacious material.
过去,许多以学校为基础的牙齿健康教育项目似乎未能促使儿童行为发生改变,也未能在口腔健康方面带来可衡量的改善。出现这种情况的原因并不总是很清楚,但部分原因可能是,在为这些项目所使用的牙齿健康教育材料进行开发之前,对相关研究的关注不够。本文描述了一个用于评估研究的合理规划周期,其中包括问题定义研究、规划研究、受众预测试以及制作后受众可接受性测试。后续阶段涉及传播后评估,包括有效性和实施情况的衡量,但本文认为,上述四个阶段构成了一种合理的方式,能够为目标群体提供合适、可接受且有效的材料。