Suppr超能文献

一项比较临床研究,测试在10岁儿童中采用体验式学习或传统讲座方式进行学校口腔健康教育的效果。

Comparative clinical study testing the effectiveness of school based oral health education using experiential learning or traditional lecturing in 10 year-old children.

作者信息

Angelopoulou Matina V, Kavvadia Katerina, Taoufik Konstantina, Oulis Constantine J

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Marquette University, School of Dentistry, 1801 W Wisconsin, 53233, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Dental School, University of Athens, Thivon 2 Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2015 Apr 28;15:51. doi: 10.1186/s12903-015-0036-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

School based oral health education through traditional lecturing has been found successful only in improving oral health knowledge, while has low effectiveness in oral hygiene and gingival health. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of experiential learning (EL) oral health education to traditional lecturing (TL), on enhancing oral health knowledge, attitude and behavior as well as oral hygiene, gingival health and caries of 10-year-old children.

METHODS

Eighty-four children were recruited for the EL and 100 for the TL group from 3 locations in Greece. Data regarding oral health knowledge, attitude and behavior were collected via questionnaires. Data regarding dental plaque, gingivitis and caries were collected by clinical examination. The evaluation using questionnaires and clinical examination was assessed at baseline and 6 and 18 months afterwards. Two calibrated pediatric dentists examined the students using a periodontal probe and artificial light. Modified hygiene index (HI) was used for dental plaque recording, the simplified gingival index (GI-S) was used for gingivitis and DMFT, based on BASCD criteria, for dental caries. Based on a dedicated manual, the teacher applied in the classroom the oral health educational program using EL.

RESULTS

EL group had statistically significant better hygiene than the TL at 6 months (p < 0.05). Within the same group, both groups had enhanced oral health knowledge at 6 and 18 months (p < 0.05) and improved oral health behavior (p > 0.05) and attitude (p > 0.05) at 6 months in comparison to baseline.

CONCLUSION

EL program was found more successful than TL in oral hygiene improvement. Both oral health education programs improved the oral health knowledge, attitude and behavior of children.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02320162).

摘要

背景

通过传统讲座进行的学校口腔健康教育仅在提高口腔健康知识方面取得了成功,而在口腔卫生和牙龈健康方面效果不佳。本研究的目的是评估体验式学习(EL)口腔健康教育与传统讲座(TL)相比,对增强10岁儿童的口腔健康知识、态度和行为以及口腔卫生、牙龈健康和龋齿情况的有效性。

方法

从希腊的3个地点招募了84名儿童参加EL组,100名儿童参加TL组。通过问卷调查收集有关口腔健康知识、态度和行为的数据。通过临床检查收集有关牙菌斑、牙龈炎和龋齿的数据。在基线以及之后的6个月和18个月时,使用问卷调查和临床检查进行评估。两名经过校准的儿科牙医使用牙周探针和人工光源对学生进行检查。改良卫生指数(HI)用于记录牙菌斑,简化牙龈指数(GI-S)用于评估牙龈炎,基于BASCD标准的DMFT用于评估龋齿。教师根据一本专门的手册,在课堂上应用EL口腔健康教育计划。

结果

在6个月时,EL组的口腔卫生状况在统计学上显著优于TL组(p < 0.05)。在同一组中,与基线相比,两组在6个月和18个月时口腔健康知识均有所增强(p < 0.05),在6个月时口腔健康行为(p > 0.05)和态度(p > 0.05)均有所改善。

结论

在改善口腔卫生方面,EL计划比TL更成功。两种口腔健康教育计划均改善了儿童的口腔健康知识、态度和行为。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02320162)。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验