Brown Joe, Sobsey Mark D, Loomis Dana
University of Alabama, Department of Biological Sciences, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0229, USA.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Sep;79(3):394-400.
A randomized, controlled intervention trial of two household-scale drinking water filters was conducted in a rural village in Cambodia. After collecting four weeks of baseline data on household water quality, diarrheal disease, and other data related to water use and handling practices, households were randomly assigned to one of three groups of 60 households: those receiving a ceramic water purifier (CWP), those receiving a second filter employing an iron-rich ceramic (CWP-Fe), and a control group receiving no intervention. Households were followed for 18 weeks post-baseline with biweekly follow-up. Households using either filter reported significantly less diarrheal disease during the study compared with a control group of households without filters as indicated by longitudinal prevalence ratios CWP: 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.63); CWP-Fe: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.47-0.71), an effect that was observed in all age groups and both sexes after controlling for clustering within households and within individuals over time.
在柬埔寨的一个乡村开展了一项针对两种家用规模饮用水过滤器的随机对照干预试验。在收集了四周关于家庭水质、腹泻病以及其他与用水和处理方式相关的数据作为基线数据后,家庭被随机分配到三组,每组60户:一组接受陶瓷净水器(CWP),一组接受采用富铁陶瓷的第二种过滤器(CWP-Fe),还有一组为不接受干预的对照组。基线之后对家庭进行了为期18周的跟踪,每两周随访一次。纵向患病率比显示,与未使用过滤器的对照组家庭相比,使用任一过滤器的家庭在研究期间报告的腹泻病显著减少:CWP组为0.51(95%置信区间[CI]:0.41 - 0.63);CWP-Fe组为0.58(95%CI:0.47 - 0.71),在控制了家庭内部和个体随时间的聚集效应后,所有年龄组和男女两性中均观察到了这一效果。