Zioupos Peter, Hansen Ulrich, Currey John D
Biomechanics Laboratories, Cranfield University, Shrivenham SN6 8LA, UK.
J Biomech. 2008 Oct 20;41(14):2932-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.07.025. Epub 2008 Sep 10.
It is difficult to define the 'physiological' mechanical properties of bone. Traumatic failures in-vivo are more likely to be orders of magnitude faster than the quasistatic tests usually employed in-vitro. We have reported recently [Hansen, U., Zioupos, P., Simpson, R., Currey, J.D., Hynd, D., 2008. The effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of human cortical bone. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering/Transactions of the ASME 130, 011011-1-8] results from tests on specimens of human femoral cortical bone loaded in tension at strain rates (epsilon ) ranging from low (0.08s(-1)) to high (18s(-1)). Across this strain rate range the modulus of elasticity generally increased, stress at yield and failure and strain at failure decreased for rates higher than 1s(-1), while strain at yield was invariant for most strain rates and only decreased at rates higher than 10s(-1). The results showed that strain rate has a stronger effect on post-yield deformation than on initiation of macroscopic yielding. In general, specimens loaded at high strain rates were brittle, while those loaded at low strain rates were much tougher. Here, a post-test examination of the microcracking damage reveals that microcracking was inversely related to the strain rate. Specimens loaded at low strain rates showed considerable post-yield strain and also much more microcracking. Partial correlation and regression analysis suggested that the development of post-yield strain was a function of the amount of microcracking incurred (the cause), rather than being a direct result of the strain rate (the excitation). Presumably low strain rates allow time for microcracking to develop, which increases the compliance of the specimen, making them tougher. This behaviour confirms a more general rule that the degree to which bone is brittle or tough depends on the amount of microcracking damage it is able to sustain. More importantly, the key to bone toughness is its ability to avoid a ductile-to-brittle transition for as long as possible during the deformation. The key to bone's brittleness, on the other hand, is the strain and damage localisation early on in the process, which leads to low post-yield strains and low-energy absorption to failure.
很难定义骨骼的“生理”力学特性。体内的创伤性骨折发生速度可能比通常在体外进行的准静态试验快几个数量级。我们最近报道了[汉森,U.,齐奥波斯,P.,辛普森,R.,柯里,J.D.,海恩德,D.,2008年。应变速率对人皮质骨力学性能的影响。《生物力学工程杂志》/美国机械工程师协会汇刊130,011011-1-8]对人股骨皮质骨标本在应变速率(ε)从低(0.08s⁻¹)到高(18s⁻¹)下进行拉伸加载试验的结果。在这个应变速率范围内,弹性模量通常会增加,对于高于1s⁻¹的速率,屈服和破坏应力以及破坏应变会降低,而屈服应变在大多数应变速率下是不变的,仅在高于10s⁻¹的速率下会降低。结果表明,应变速率对屈服后变形的影响比对宏观屈服起始的影响更强。一般来说,以高应变速率加载的标本是脆性的,而以低应变速率加载的标本则韧性大得多。在此,对微裂纹损伤的测试后检查表明,微裂纹与应变速率呈负相关。以低应变速率加载的标本显示出相当大的屈服后应变,并且微裂纹也更多。偏相关和回归分析表明,屈服后应变的发展是所产生微裂纹数量(原因)的函数,而不是应变速率(激发因素)的直接结果。据推测,低应变速率为微裂纹的发展留出了时间,这增加了标本的柔度,使其更具韧性。这种行为证实了一个更普遍的规律,即骨骼脆性或韧性的程度取决于其能够承受的微裂纹损伤量。更重要的是,骨骼韧性的关键在于其在变形过程中尽可能长时间避免从韧性向脆性转变的能力。另一方面,骨骼脆性的关键在于过程早期的应变和损伤局部化,这导致低屈服后应变和低能量吸收直至破坏。