Jakobi Jennifer M, Edwards Darl L, Connelly Denise M
Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia - Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.
Gerontology. 2008;54(5):324-31. doi: 10.1159/000155655. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
Mobility has been studied using performance, questionnaire, pedometer and accelerometer measures, but these tools do not provide information about muscle activity. To better understand mechanisms associated with movement impairment as they relate to function, it is valuable to quantify muscle activity during everyday activities.
This report presents electromyography (EMG) during daily activities from the affected and unaffected limbs of a 74-year-old man who survived a stroke 12 years ago, compared to 7 older healthy men who had not experienced a stroke.
The biceps brachii, triceps brachii, quadriceps and hamstring muscles were recorded continuously for one 8-hour session in the unaffected limbs of the stroke survivor and control subjects. On a second day, EMG from these same muscles of the affected side was recorded for 4 h. Bursts (amplitude >2% maximum effort, duration >0.1 s) and gaps (amplitude <1% maximum effort, duration >0.1 s) of EMG were quantified for the number of times they occurred, mean event duration (seconds), mean peak amplitude (percent maximum voluntary efforts) and rate of activity (event activity/second).
Burst and gap patterns of the unaffected limb muscles were similar between the stroke survivor and controls. Increased numbers of bursts (approx. 40%) and gaps (approx. 44%) were seen in the subject's lower limb muscles of his affected versus unaffected side. Biceps brachii burst activity of the affected limb was increased, whereas triceps brachii burst activity was decreased. These muscle activity changes in the affected limb suggest that the triceps brachii was relatively inactive and the biceps brachii and lower limb muscles were active in an 'on' and 'off' pattern.
Muscle activity in the unaffected limb of the stroke survivor was similar compared to control subjects, but the affected limb differed from the unaffected after stroke. Portable EMG to monitor muscle activity for prolonged periods was not reported to be an impediment by the case or control subjects. Using this technology, EMG bursts and gaps can be recorded and used to describe muscle activity. Future work may consider the feasibility of this technique to monitor rehabilitation progression or long-term plasticity of muscle activity.
人们已通过性能、问卷调查、计步器和加速度计测量等方式对活动能力进行了研究,但这些工具无法提供有关肌肉活动的信息。为了更好地理解与运动功能障碍相关的机制,在日常活动中对肌肉活动进行量化很有价值。
本报告展示了一名12年前中风后幸存的74岁男性患者患侧和未患侧肢体在日常活动中的肌电图(EMG),并与7名未患过中风的老年健康男性进行了比较。
在中风幸存者和对照受试者的未患侧肢体上,对肱二头肌、肱三头肌、股四头肌和腘绳肌连续记录8小时。第二天,对患侧相同肌肉的肌电图记录4小时。对肌电图的爆发(幅度>最大努力的2%,持续时间>0.1秒)和间隙(幅度<最大努力的1%,持续时间>0.1秒)的发生次数、平均事件持续时间(秒)、平均峰值幅度(最大自主努力的百分比)和活动率(事件活动/秒)进行量化。
中风幸存者和对照组未患侧肢体肌肉的爆发和间隙模式相似。与未患侧相比,该受试者患侧下肢肌肉的爆发次数(约40%)和间隙次数(约44%)增加。患侧肱二头肌的爆发活动增加,而肱三头肌的爆发活动减少。患侧肢体的这些肌肉活动变化表明,肱三头肌相对不活跃,肱二头肌和下肢肌肉以“开”和“关”的模式活跃。
中风幸存者未患侧肢体的肌肉活动与对照受试者相似,但中风后患侧肢体与未患侧不同。该病例或对照受试者均未报告便携式肌电图长时间监测肌肉活动存在障碍。使用该技术,可以记录肌电图的爆发和间隙并用于描述肌肉活动。未来的工作可以考虑该技术监测康复进展或肌肉活动长期可塑性的可行性。