• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痉挛性偏瘫患者拮抗肌肘部肌肉激活模式受损:对运动障碍的影响

Impaired activation pattern in antagonistic elbow muscles of patients with spastic hemiparesis: contribution to movement disorder.

作者信息

el-Abd M A, Ibrahim I K, Dietz V

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine, University of Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Jun;33(4):247-55.

PMID:8359130
Abstract

Surface electromyographic "EMG" activity in biceps brachii (agonist muscle) and triceps brachii (antagonist muscle) as well as the discharge behaviour of motor units "MUs" (needle recording) in biceps brachii muscle were recorded during slow (0.33 Hz) and fast (0.66 Hz) voluntary elbow flexion movements (auditory matching task) in fifty patients with spastic hemiplegia. In the spastic limbs, a long lasting, small amplitude tonic co-contraction of antagonist muscles was seen during slow flexions (SF) in 29 cases. This effect was strongest during the fast elbow flexion movements (FF). In 33 patients a triphasic pattern of muscle activation was observed on the unaffected side but not on the spastic side. The amplitude of the agonist surface EMG was significantly reduced and the amplitudes of the MU potentials recruited during maximal effort were generally smaller on the spastic side compared to the unaffected side. The agonist-antagonist activation pattern was analysed with respect to three clinically identifiable functional recovery stages of voluntary movements in the spastic limbs, namely synergistic, isolated and useful movements. The MU amplitudes and the amplitude of the surface EMG activity in the agonist muscle recorded during FF movements became significantly larger whereas the amplitude of the antagonist tonic activity became smaller with increasing functional recovery of the limb. It is concluded that impaired recruitment of type II motor units in the agonist muscles and the inability to selectively activate the agonist muscle contribute to the deficit in motor performance in spastic paresis.

摘要

在50例痉挛性偏瘫患者进行缓慢(0.33Hz)和快速(0.66Hz)的自主肘关节屈曲运动(听觉匹配任务)期间,记录肱二头肌(主动肌)和肱三头肌(拮抗肌)的表面肌电图(EMG)活动,以及肱二头肌中运动单位(MUs)的放电行为(针电极记录)。在痉挛侧肢体中,29例患者在缓慢屈曲(SF)过程中可见拮抗肌出现持续时间长、小幅度的强直性共同收缩。这种效应在快速肘关节屈曲运动(FF)期间最为明显。在33例患者中,未受影响侧观察到肌肉激活的三相模式,而痉挛侧未观察到。与未受影响侧相比,痉挛侧主动肌表面EMG的幅度显著降低,最大用力时募集的运动单位电位幅度通常较小。针对痉挛侧肢体自主运动的三个临床可识别功能恢复阶段,即协同运动、分离运动和实用运动,分析了主动肌-拮抗肌激活模式。随着肢体功能恢复程度的增加,FF运动期间记录的主动肌中运动单位幅度和表面EMG活动幅度显著增大,而拮抗肌强直性活动幅度减小。得出的结论是,主动肌中II型运动单位募集受损以及无法选择性激活主动肌导致了痉挛性轻瘫患者运动表现的缺陷。

相似文献

1
Impaired activation pattern in antagonistic elbow muscles of patients with spastic hemiparesis: contribution to movement disorder.痉挛性偏瘫患者拮抗肌肘部肌肉激活模式受损:对运动障碍的影响
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Jun;33(4):247-55.
2
Reflex activity and muscle tone during elbow movements in patients with spastic paresis.痉挛性轻瘫患者肘部运动时的反射活动和肌张力
Ann Neurol. 1991 Dec;30(6):767-79. doi: 10.1002/ana.410300605.
3
Voluntary movement at the elbow in spastic hemiparesis.痉挛性偏瘫时肘部的随意运动。
Ann Neurol. 1994 Sep;36(3):397-407. doi: 10.1002/ana.410360311.
4
EMG and MMG of agonist and antagonist muscles as a function of age and joint angle.作为年龄和关节角度函数的主动肌和拮抗肌的肌电图和肌磁图。
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006 Feb;16(1):89-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.05.003. Epub 2005 Aug 11.
5
Eccentric muscle damage has variable effects on motor unit recruitment thresholds and discharge patterns in elbow flexor muscles.离心性肌肉损伤对肘部屈肌的运动单位募集阈值和放电模式有不同影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jul;102(1):413-23. doi: 10.1152/jn.91285.2008. Epub 2009 May 6.
6
Dynamic motor capacity in spastic paresis and its relation to prime mover dysfunction, spastic reflexes and antagonist co-activation.
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1980;12(3):93-106.
7
[Assessment of motor impairment with electromyography--the kinesiological EMG].[肌电图评估运动障碍——运动学肌电图]
Ideggyogy Sz. 2003 Nov 20;56(11-12):360-9.
8
Isometric contractions of normal and spastic human skeletal muscle.正常和痉挛性人体骨骼肌的等长收缩
Muscle Nerve. 1981 May-Jun;4(3):214-8. doi: 10.1002/mus.880040307.
9
Characteristics of motor unit discharge in subjects with hemiparesis.偏瘫患者运动单位放电的特征。
Muscle Nerve. 1995 Oct;18(10):1101-14. doi: 10.1002/mus.880181006.
10
Coactivation of the elbow antagonist muscles is not affected by the speed of movement in isokinetic exercise.在等速运动中,肘部拮抗肌的共同激活不受运动速度的影响。
Muscle Nerve. 2006 Feb;33(2):191-9. doi: 10.1002/mus.20462.

引用本文的文献

1
Upper limb kinematics during the first year after stroke: the stroke arm longitudinal study at the University of Gothenburg (SALGOT).脑卒中后第一年上肢运动学:哥德堡大学脑卒中手臂纵向研究(SALGOT)。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Jun 15;17(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00705-2.
2
Stretch-sensitive paresis and effort perception in hemiparesis.偏瘫中的牵张敏感轻瘫与用力感知
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2015 Aug;122(8):1089-97. doi: 10.1007/s00702-015-1379-3. Epub 2015 Feb 22.
3
Factors that influence muscle weakness following stroke and their clinical implications: a critical review.
影响中风后肌肉无力的因素及其临床意义:一项批判性综述。
Physiother Can. 2012 Fall;64(4):415-26. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2011-03.
4
Contralesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke reflect hemisphere-specific control mechanisms.单侧卒中后对侧运动缺陷反映了半球特异性控制机制。
Brain. 2013 Apr;136(Pt 4):1288-303. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws283. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
5
Elastic, viscous, and mass load effects on poststroke muscle recruitment and co-contraction during reaching: a pilot study.弹性、粘性和质量负荷对中风后伸手动作时肌肉募集和共同收缩的影响:一项初步研究。
Phys Ther. 2009 Jul;89(7):665-78. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080128. Epub 2009 May 14.
6
Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis.慢性偏瘫患者自由和受限手臂运动中与目标相关的差异。
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Jun;156(4):458-70. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1807-8. Epub 2004 Feb 17.
7
Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke.中风患者伸手过程中的关节间协调动力学
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Aug;151(3):289-300. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1438-0. Epub 2003 Jun 19.