Rüfer Florian, Saeger Mark, Nölle Bernhard, Roider Johann
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Apr;247(4):457-62. doi: 10.1007/s00417-008-0940-2. Epub 2008 Sep 12.
For aphakic patients without lens-supporting apparatus, secondary lens implantation can be considered. Literature on retropupillar iris claw lens implantation as a safe alternative to scleral fixated posterior chamber lenses is scarce.
The study included 22 patients. In ten cases, an iris claw lens was implanted retropupillary without penetrating keratoplasty (group 1), in 12 patients the implantation of a retropupillar iris claw lens was combined with penetrating keratoplasty (group 2). Complications observed were retrospectively evaluated. Previous operations and accompanying diseases were compiled. Reasons for aphakia in group 1/group 2 included perioperative complications (60%/75%) and primary ocular trauma (40%/25%). Unless already performed in an earlier operation, anterior or complete vitrectomy was performed in both groups.
Perioperative complications (within 1 week postoperatively) in group 1 included ocular hypotony in 20%, choroidal detachment in 10%, vitreous haemorrhage in 10% and intraocular lens (IOL) decentration in 10% of the cases; in group 2, transient intraocular pressure elevation in 8% of the cases. Postoperative complications (after the first postoperative week) in group 1 were lens tilt in 10%, lens luxation in 10%, cellular deposits (assumed to be macrophages) on lens surface in 10%, cornea guttata in 10% and epiretinal gliosis in 10% of the cases; in group 2, secondary glaucoma in 33%, iris defect in 8% and corneal ulcer in 8% of the cases.
Retropupillar iris claw lenses are an alternative to scleral fixated secondary lenses, which are worth considering for aphakic patients without lens supporting apparatus. This approach appears to be recommendable even in cases requiring penetrating keratoplasty, and can be performed as a combined procedure. In these patients, the most frequent complication following iris claw lens implantation seems to be secondary glaucoma.
对于没有晶状体支撑装置的无晶状体患者,可以考虑二期晶状体植入。关于瞳孔后虹膜爪状晶状体植入作为巩膜固定后房型晶状体的一种安全替代方法的文献很少。
该研究纳入了22例患者。10例患者在未行穿透性角膜移植术的情况下瞳孔后植入虹膜爪状晶状体(第1组),12例患者将瞳孔后虹膜爪状晶状体植入与穿透性角膜移植术联合进行(第2组)。对观察到的并发症进行回顾性评估。整理既往手术及伴随疾病情况。第1组/第2组无晶状体的原因包括围手术期并发症(60%/75%)和原发性眼外伤(40%/25%)。除非在早期手术中已经进行,两组均进行了前部或完全玻璃体切除术。
第1组围手术期并发症(术后1周内)包括20%的患者出现低眼压,10%的患者出现脉络膜脱离,10%的患者出现玻璃体出血,10%的患者出现人工晶状体偏心;第2组8%的患者出现短暂眼压升高。第1组术后并发症(术后第一周后)包括10%的患者出现晶状体倾斜,10%的患者出现晶状体脱位,10%的患者晶状体表面有细胞沉积物(推测为巨噬细胞),10%的患者出现角膜滴状变性,10%的患者出现视网膜前胶质增生;第2组33%的患者出现继发性青光眼,8%的患者出现虹膜缺损,8%的患者出现角膜溃疡。
瞳孔后虹膜爪状晶状体是巩膜固定二期晶状体的一种替代方法,对于没有晶状体支撑装置的无晶状体患者值得考虑。即使在需要穿透性角膜移植术的情况下,这种方法似乎也是可取的,并且可以作为联合手术进行。在这些患者中,虹膜爪状晶状体植入后最常见的并发症似乎是继发性青光眼。