• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转介样本中家长、教师和青少年评分之间的一致性模式。

Patterns of agreement among parent, teacher and youth ratings in a referred sample.

作者信息

Salbach-Andrae Harriet, Lenz Klaus, Lehmkuhl Ulrike

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;24(5):345-51. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2008.07.008
PMID:18789656
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the degree of agreement among parents, teachers and adolescents with respect to the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), the Teacher's Report Form (TRF), and the Youth Self Report (YSR). In addition we evaluated the suitability of these three forms (CBCL, TRF and YSR) in terms of their contribution to understanding internalizing and externalizing disorders in youths being referred to a child and adolescent unit of a psychiatric care facility.

METHODS

A total of 611 patients aged 11-18 years (mean age 13.0, SD 1.6) were assessed using the CBCL, the TRF and the YSR.

RESULTS

Intraclass coefficients (ICC) showed low to moderate agreement among informants. Furthermore, the level of agreement was generally less among patients suffering from internalizing disorders than for young patients who displayed externalizing disorders. Logistic regression revealed that the TRF internalizing syndrome scale, the CBCL internalizing syndrome scale and gender were relevant prognostic factors for the occurrence of internalizing disorders in youth. The YSR internalizing syndrome scale, on the other hand, was not a relevant factor among adolescents of a clinical target population. Likewise, only the TRF externalizing syndrome scale, the CBCL externalizing syndrome scale and gender were relevant prognostic factors for the occurrence of externalizing disorders in youth.

CONCLUSIONS

Particularly the CBCL and TRF are useful instruments in assessing internalizing and externalizing disorders in adolescents referred to a mental health setting.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查家长、教师和青少年在儿童行为量表(CBCL)、教师报告表(TRF)和青少年自我报告(YSR)方面的一致程度。此外,我们根据这三种表格(CBCL、TRF和YSR)对理解转介至精神科护理机构儿童青少年单元的青少年内化和外化障碍的贡献,评估了它们的适用性。

方法

使用CBCL、TRF和YSR对总共611名11 - 18岁(平均年龄13.0,标准差1.6)的患者进行评估。

结果

组内相关系数(ICC)显示信息提供者之间的一致性为低到中度。此外,内化障碍患者之间的一致程度通常低于表现出外化障碍的年轻患者。逻辑回归显示,TRF内化综合征量表、CBCL内化综合征量表和性别是青少年内化障碍发生的相关预后因素。另一方面,YSR内化综合征量表在临床目标人群的青少年中不是一个相关因素。同样,只有TRF外化综合征量表、CBCL外化综合征量表和性别是青少年外化障碍发生的相关预后因素。

结论

特别是CBCL和TRF是评估转介至心理健康机构的青少年内化和外化障碍的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Patterns of agreement among parent, teacher and youth ratings in a referred sample.转介样本中家长、教师和青少年评分之间的一致性模式。
Eur Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;24(5):345-51. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
2
Mental health of adolescents reared in institutional care in Turkey: challenges and hope in the twenty-first century.土耳其机构照料环境下成长的青少年的心理健康:二十一世纪的挑战与希望。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;19(2):113-24. doi: 10.1007/s00787-009-0047-2. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
3
Parent-teacher disagreement regarding psychopathology in children: a risk factor for adverse outcome?家长与教师对儿童精神病理学的分歧:不良后果的风险因素?
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007 Jan;115(1):48-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00843.x.
4
Behavioral and emotional problems among Chinese and American children: parent and teacher reports for ages 6 to 13.中国和美国儿童的行为与情绪问题:6至13岁儿童家长及教师报告
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1995 Oct;23(5):619-39. doi: 10.1007/BF01447666.
5
Patterns and correlates of agreement between parent, teacher, and male adolescent ratings of externalizing and internalizing problems.父母、教师和男性青少年对外化问题和内化问题评分之间的一致性模式及相关因素。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Dec;68(6):1038-50. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.68.6.1038.
6
Analysis of the convergent and discriminant validity of the CBCL, TRF, and YSR in a clinic-referred sample.对临床转诊样本中儿童行为检查表(CBCL)、青少年自评量表(TRF)和青年自评量表(YSR)的收敛效度和区分效度的分析。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014 Nov;42(8):1413-25. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9879-4.
7
Examining the criterion validity of CBCL and TRF problem scales and items in a large Singapore sample.在一个大型新加坡样本中检验 CBCL 和 TRF 问题量表和项目的效标效度。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2012 Feb;43(1):70-86. doi: 10.1007/s10578-011-0253-2.
8
Self- and parent assessment of mental health: disagreement on externalizing and internalizing behaviour in young refugees from the Middle East.心理健康的自我评估与家长评估:中东地区年轻难民在外显和内化行为方面的分歧
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;13(1):49-63. doi: 10.1177/1359104507086341.
9
Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).《优势与困难问卷》(SDQ)荷兰语版本。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;12(6):281-9. doi: 10.1007/s00787-003-0341-3.
10
[Epidemiology of emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents reared in orphanages: a national comparative study].[孤儿院养育的儿童和青少年情绪及行为问题的流行病学:一项全国性比较研究]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2008 Fall;19(3):235-46.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized controlled trial of the early adolescent coping power program: Effects on emotional and behavioral problems in middle schoolers.青少年早期应对能力项目的随机对照试验:对中学生情绪和行为问题的影响
J Sch Psychol. 2025 Jun;110:101437. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101437. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
2
Inter-rater Agreement in Multi-informant Reports of Psychosocial Functioning of Pediatric Brain and Solid Tumor Survivors.小儿脑肿瘤和实体瘤幸存者心理社会功能多信息报告中的评分者间一致性
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2025 Jun;32(2):297-305. doi: 10.1007/s10880-024-10059-9. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
3
Adaptation and validation for use in Brazil of the Confusion, Hubbub, and Order Scale (CHAOS).
用于巴西的混乱、喧闹与秩序量表(CHAOS)的改编与验证。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2024 Jul 15;37(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s41155-024-00310-5.
4
Children's Mental Health: Discrepancy between Child Self-Reporting and Parental Reporting.儿童心理健康:儿童自我报告与家长报告之间的差异。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Oct 19;12(10):401. doi: 10.3390/bs12100401.
5
Teacher reports of emotional and behavioral problems in Nepali schoolchildren: to what extent do they agree with parent reports?教师报告尼泊尔学童的情绪和行为问题:在多大程度上与家长报告一致?
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 2;22(1):584. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04215-4.
6
Cross-Informant Compatibility of Depression Symptoms in Children: A Network Approach.儿童抑郁症状的跨报告者一致性:网络方法。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Apr;55(2):308-319. doi: 10.1007/s10578-022-01403-x. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
7
Mental Health in Pre-Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy: Exploring the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a Screening Tool in a Follow-Up Study including Multi-Informants.脑瘫青少年前期患者的心理健康:在一项包括多信息提供者的随访研究中,探索使用长处与困难问卷作为筛查工具。
Children (Basel). 2022 Jul 6;9(7):1009. doi: 10.3390/children9071009.
8
What if children with psychiatric problems disagree with their clinicians on the need for care? Factors explaining discordance and clinical directions.如果有精神问题的儿童与临床医生在是否需要治疗的问题上存在分歧会怎样?解释不一致性的因素及临床指导方向。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2022 Feb 14;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13034-022-00448-z.
9
The interplay between math anxiety and working memory on math performance: a longitudinal study.数学焦虑与工作记忆对数学表现的相互作用:一项纵向研究。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2022 Apr;1510(1):132-144. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14722. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
10
Learning Disabilities Elevate Children's Risk for Behavioral-Emotional Problems: Differences Between LD Types, Genders, and Contexts.学习障碍使儿童面临行为-情绪问题的风险增加:LD 类型、性别和情境的差异。
J Learn Disabil. 2022 Nov-Dec;55(6):465-481. doi: 10.1177/00222194211056297. Epub 2021 Nov 13.