Barbaresi William J, Colligan Robert C, Weaver Amy L, Katusic Slavica K
Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Mar;39(3):464-70. doi: 10.1007/s10803-008-0645-8. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
Autism prevalence studies have often relied on administrative prevalence or clinical diagnosis as case-identification strategies. We report the incidence of clinical diagnoses of autism spectrum disorders (ASD), versus research-identified autism among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, age < or =21 years, from 1976-1997. The incidence of clinically diagnosed ASD (with 95% CI) was 1.5 per 100,000 (0.0-3.7) in 1980-1983 and 33.1 (22.8-43.3) in 1995-1997, a 22.1-fold increase. In contrast, the incidence of research-identified autism increased from 5.5 (1.4-9.5) per 100,000 to 44.9 (32.9-56.9), an 8.2-fold increase. Only 46.8% of research-identified cases received a clinical diagnosis of ASD. These findings demonstrate the potential for misleading interpretation of results from epidemiologic studies that rely on clinical diagnosis of autism to identify cases.
自闭症患病率研究通常依赖行政患病率或临床诊断作为病例识别策略。我们报告了1976年至1997年明尼苏达州奥尔姆斯特德县年龄小于或等于21岁居民中自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)临床诊断的发病率,以及研究确定的自闭症发病率。1980年至1983年临床诊断的ASD发病率(95%置信区间)为每10万人1.5例(0.0 - 3.7),1995年至1997年为33.1例(22.8 - 43.3),增长了22.1倍。相比之下,研究确定的自闭症发病率从每10万人5.5例(1.4 - 9.5)增至44.9例(32.9 - 56.9),增长了8.2倍。研究确定的病例中只有46.8%获得了ASD临床诊断。这些发现表明,依赖自闭症临床诊断来识别病例的流行病学研究结果可能会被误导性解读。