Gordon Debra B, Rees Susan M, McCausland Maureen R, Pellino Teresa A, Sanford-Ring Sue, Smith-Helmenstine Jackie, Danis Dianne M
University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Sep;34(9):509-17. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34065-3.
The Joint Commission standards on pain management address the documentation of assessment and reassessment. Yet, little has been published to describe when and how nurses perform and communicate reassessment of pain. In 2005, the University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics (UWHC) was inconsistently reassessing pain after interventions, and documented reassessments were primarily confined to pain-intensity ratings. PLAN-DO-CHECK-ACT: A large-scale plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle was implemented to improve the documentation of pain reassessments, including development of an evidence-based administrative policy, repetitive education efforts with bedside coaching, changes in daily bedside documentation flow sheets, and audit and feedback.
From May 29, 2006, through July 16, 2008, a cumulative rate of 94.9% appropriately documented pain reassessments was achieved.
Despite implementation of an evidence-based policy to clarify requirements for pain reassessment, repetitive educational efforts, changes in daily bedside flow sheets, direct and extensive leadership involvement in the form of continuous bedside coaching, combined with more timely and persistent audit and feedback and clear accountability and alignment with goals, was necessary for substantial change. Strategies to sustain improvements include daily administrative and monthly staff documentation audits with prompt feedback to clinical nurse managers and staff. Nurses are instructed on the importance of pain reassessments and on the policy and specific documentation requirements. Reassessment of pain is a routine variable displayed on unit and departmental quality dashboards. Further study should examine if the intensity of this requirement for pain reassessment documentation ultimately facilitates the safety and effectiveness of pain management.
联合委员会关于疼痛管理的标准涉及评估和重新评估的记录。然而,关于护士何时以及如何进行疼痛重新评估并进行沟通的相关报道甚少。2005年,威斯康星大学医院及诊所(UWHC)在干预措施后对疼痛的重新评估并不一致,且记录的重新评估主要局限于疼痛强度评级。
计划 - 执行 - 检查 - 行动:实施了一个大规模的计划 - 执行 - 检查 - 行动(PDCA)循环,以改善疼痛重新评估的记录,包括制定基于证据的管理政策、通过床边指导进行反复教育、改变每日床边记录流程图,以及审核与反馈。
从2006年5月29日至2008年7月16日,疼痛重新评估的适当记录累积率达到了94.9%。
尽管实施了基于证据的政策来明确疼痛重新评估的要求,但要实现实质性改变,仍需要反复的教育努力、每日床边流程图的改变、以持续床边指导形式的直接且广泛的领导参与,再加上更及时和持续的审核与反馈以及明确的问责制和与目标的一致性。维持改进的策略包括每日行政和每月员工记录审核,并及时向临床护士长和员工反馈。向护士讲解疼痛重新评估的重要性以及政策和具体记录要求。疼痛重新评估是在科室和部门质量仪表板上显示的常规变量。进一步的研究应检查这种对疼痛重新评估记录的要求强度最终是否有助于疼痛管理的安全性和有效性。