• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Screening, treatment, and prostate cancer mortality in the Seattle area and Connecticut: fifteen-year follow-up.西雅图地区和康涅狄格州的前列腺癌筛查、治疗与死亡率:十五年随访
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Nov;23(11):1809-14. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0785-8. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
2
Natural experiment examining impact of aggressive screening and treatment on prostate cancer mortality in two fixed cohorts from Seattle area and Connecticut.一项自然实验,研究积极筛查和治疗对来自西雅图地区和康涅狄格州的两个固定队列中前列腺癌死亡率的影响。
BMJ. 2002 Oct 5;325(7367):740. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.740.
3
Changes in prostate cancer incidence and treatment in USA.美国前列腺癌发病率及治疗情况的变化
Lancet. 1994 Jan 29;343(8892):251-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91109-6.
4
Combined External Beam Radiation Therapy and Brachytherapy versus Radical Prostatectomy with Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Gleason 9-10 Prostate Cancer.对于 Gleason 9-10 前列腺癌,联合外照射放疗和近距离放疗与根治性前列腺切除术加辅助放疗的比较。
J Urol. 2019 Nov;202(5):973-978. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000352. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
5
Morbidity and Mortality of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Population Based Analysis Comparing Radical Prostatectomy versus External Beam Radiation.局部晚期前列腺癌的发病率和死亡率:比较根治性前列腺切除术与外照射放疗的基于人群的分析。
J Urol. 2017 Nov;198(5):1061-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.05.073. Epub 2017 May 26.
6
Follow-up prostate cancer treatments after radical prostatectomy: a population-based study.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Feb 21;88(3-4):166-73. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.3-4.166.
7
Radical Prostatectomy or External Beam Radiation Therapy vs No Local Therapy for Survival Benefit in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A SEER-Medicare Analysis.根治性前列腺切除术或外照射放疗与不进行局部治疗对转移性前列腺癌生存获益的影响:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)医保分析
J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.084. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
8
The role of increasing detection in the rising incidence of prostate cancer.检测手段增加在前列腺癌发病率上升中所起的作用。
JAMA. 1995 Feb 15;273(7):548-52.
9
Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, or External Beam Radiotherapy With Brachytherapy Boost and Disease Progression and Mortality in Patients With Gleason Score 9-10 Prostate Cancer.根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗、外照射放疗联合近距离放疗增敏与 Gleason 评分 9 - 10 前列腺癌患者的疾病进展及死亡率
JAMA. 2018 Mar 6;319(9):896-905. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0587.
10
Physician visits prior to treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer.临床局限性前列腺癌治疗前的医生问诊。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Mar 8;170(5):440-50. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoding the heterogeneous landscape in the development prostate cancer.解析前列腺癌发展过程中的异质性格局。
Oncol Lett. 2021 May;21(5):376. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12637. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
2
What explains the differences between centres in the European screening trial? A simulation study.如何解释欧洲筛查试验中各中心之间的差异?一项模拟研究。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2017 Feb;46:14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
3
Impact of cause of death adjudication on the results of the European prostate cancer screening trial.死因判定对欧洲前列腺癌筛查试验结果的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2017 Jan 3;116(1):141-148. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.378. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
4
Prostate cancer mortality in areas with high and low prostate cancer incidence.高发和低发地区的前列腺癌死亡率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Mar;106(3):dju007. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju007. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
5
Genomic Rearrangements of PTEN in Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌中PTEN的基因组重排
Front Oncol. 2013 Sep 17;3:240. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00240.
6
Trends in prostate cancer in the United States.美国前列腺癌的趋势。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2012 Dec;2012(45):152-6. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs035.
7
The impact of PSA screening on prostate cancer mortality and overdiagnosis of prostate cancer in the United States.美国 PSA 筛查对前列腺癌死亡率和过度诊断前列腺癌的影响。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Jan;68(1):56-61. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls135. Epub 2012 May 4.
8
Historical prostate cancer screening and treatment outcomes from a single institution.来自单一机构的前列腺癌历史筛查与治疗结果。
Clin Med Res. 2012 Aug;10(3):97-105. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2011.1042. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
9
Prostate cancer epidemiology in the United States.美国的前列腺癌流行病学。
World J Urol. 2012 Apr;30(2):195-200. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0824-2. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
10
Screening for prostate cancer: early detection or overdetection?前列腺癌筛查:早期发现还是过度诊断?
Annu Rev Med. 2012;63:161-70. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-050710-134421. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival associated with treatment vs observation of localized prostate cancer in elderly men.老年男性局限性前列腺癌治疗与观察的生存情况比较
JAMA. 2006 Dec 13;296(22):2683-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.22.2683.
2
Reduction of prostate cancer mortality in Tyrol, Austria, after introduction of prostate-specific antigen testing.在奥地利蒂罗尔引入前列腺特异性抗原检测后前列腺癌死亡率的降低
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Aug 15;164(4):376-84. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj213. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
3
American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2006.美国癌症协会2006年癌症早期检测指南。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 Jan-Feb;56(1):11-25; quiz 49-50. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.56.1.11.
4
The effectiveness of screening for prostate cancer: a nested case-control study.前列腺癌筛查的有效性:一项巢式病例对照研究。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jan 9;166(1):38-43. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.1.38.
5
Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.早期前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术与观察等待对比
N Engl J Med. 2005 May 12;352(19):1977-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043739.
6
An ecologic study of prostate-specific antigen screening and prostate cancer mortality in nine geographic areas of the United States.美国九个地理区域前列腺特异性抗原筛查与前列腺癌死亡率的生态学研究。
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Dec 1;160(11):1059-69. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh336.
7
Decreasing mortality rates for prostate cancer: possible role of hormonal therapy?
BJU Int. 2004 Apr;93(6):695-701. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04713.x.
8
The prostate cancer conundrum.前列腺癌难题
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Jul 2;95(13):930-1. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.13.930.
9
Natural experiment examining impact of aggressive screening and treatment on prostate cancer mortality in two fixed cohorts from Seattle area and Connecticut.一项自然实验,研究积极筛查和治疗对来自西雅图地区和康涅狄格州的两个固定队列中前列腺癌死亡率的影响。
BMJ. 2002 Oct 5;325(7367):740. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.740.
10
Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.SEER-医疗保险数据概述:内容、研究应用及对美国老年人群的普遍性
Med Care. 2002 Aug;40(8 Suppl):IV-3-18. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000020942.47004.03.

西雅图地区和康涅狄格州的前列腺癌筛查、治疗与死亡率:十五年随访

Screening, treatment, and prostate cancer mortality in the Seattle area and Connecticut: fifteen-year follow-up.

作者信息

Lu-Yao Grace, Albertsen Peter C, Stanford Janet L, Stukel Therese A, Walker-Corkery Elizabeth, Barry Michael J

机构信息

The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Nov;23(11):1809-14. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0785-8. Epub 2008 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-008-0785-8
PMID:18795372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2585661/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior to introduction of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, the Seattle-Puget Sound and Connecticut Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) areas had similar prostate cancer mortality rates. Early in the PSA era (1987-1990), men in the Seattle area were screened and treated more intensively for prostate cancer than men in Connecticut.

OBJECTIVE

We previously reported more intensive screening and treatment early in the PSA era did not lower prostate cancer mortality through 11 years and now extend follow-up to 15 years.

DESIGN

Natural experiment comparing two fixed population-based cohorts.

SUBJECTS

Male Medicare beneficiaries ages 65-79 from the Seattle (N = 94,900) and Connecticut (N = 120,621) SEER areas, followed from 1987-2001.

MEASUREMENTS

Rates of prostate cancer screening; treatment with radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy; and prostate cancer-specific mortality.

MAIN RESULTS

The 15-year cumulative incidences of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy through 2001 were 2.84% and 6.02%, respectively, for Seattle cohort members, compared to 0.56% and 5.07% for Connecticut cohort members (odds ratio 5.20, 95% confidence interval 3.22 to 8.42 for surgery and odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.58 for radiation). The cumulative incidence of androgen deprivation therapy from 1991-2001 was 4.78% for Seattle compared to 6.13% for Connecticut (odds ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.87). The adjusted rate ratio of prostate cancer mortality through 2001 was 1.02 (95% C.I. 0.96 to 1.09) in Seattle versus Connecticut.

CONCLUSION

Among men aged 65 or older, more intensive prostate cancer screening early in the PSA era and more intensive treatment particularly with radical prostatectomy over 15 years of follow-up were not associated with lower prostate cancer-specific mortality.

摘要

背景

在前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测引入之前,西雅图 - 普吉特海湾地区和康涅狄格州的监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)地区的前列腺癌死亡率相似。在PSA时代早期(1987 - 1990年),西雅图地区的男性比康涅狄格州的男性接受前列腺癌筛查和治疗的强度更大。

目的

我们之前报道在PSA时代早期更密集的筛查和治疗在11年期间并未降低前列腺癌死亡率,现在将随访时间延长至15年。

设计

比较两个基于固定人群队列的自然实验。

研究对象

来自西雅图(N = 94,900)和康涅狄格州(N = 120,621)SEER地区的65 - 79岁男性医疗保险受益人群,随访时间为1987年至2001年。

测量指标

前列腺癌筛查率;根治性前列腺切除术、外照射放疗和雄激素剥夺治疗的治疗率;以及前列腺癌特异性死亡率。

主要结果

到2001年,西雅图队列成员根治性前列腺切除术和放疗的15年累积发生率分别为2.84%和6.02%,而康涅狄格队列成员分别为0.56%和5.07%(手术的优势比为5.20,95%置信区间为3.22至8.42;放疗的优势比为1.24,95%置信区间为0.98至1.58)。1991年至2001年雄激素剥夺治疗的累积发生率,西雅图为4.78%,康涅狄格为6.13%(优势比为0.77,95%置信区间为0.67至0.87)。到2001年,西雅图与康涅狄格相比,前列腺癌死亡率的调整率比为1.02(95%置信区间为0.96至1.09)。

结论

在65岁及以上男性中,在PSA时代早期更密集的前列腺癌筛查以及在15年随访期间更密集的治疗,尤其是根治性前列腺切除术,与较低的前列腺癌特异性死亡率无关。