Cacho J, Sevillano J, de Castro J, Herrera E, Ramos M P
Facultades de Farmacia y Medicina, Universidad CEU (Centro de Estudios Universitarios) San Pablo, Madrid, Spain.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Nov;295(5):E1269-76. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90207.2008. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
Insulin resistance plays a role in the pathogenesis of diabetes, including gestational diabetes. The glucose clamp is considered the gold standard for determining in vivo insulin sensitivity, both in human and in animal models. However, the clamp is laborious, time consuming and, in animals, requires anesthesia and collection of multiple blood samples. In human studies, a number of simple indexes, derived from fasting glucose and insulin levels, have been obtained and validated against the glucose clamp. However, these indexes have not been validated in rats and their accuracy in predicting altered insulin sensitivity remains to be established. In the present study, we have evaluated whether indirect estimates based on fasting glucose and insulin levels are valid predictors of insulin sensitivity in nonpregnant and 20-day-pregnant Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats. We have analyzed the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), and the fasting glucose-to-insulin ratio (FGIR) by comparing them with the insulin sensitivity (SI(Clamp)) values obtained during the hyperinsulinemic-isoglycemic clamp. We have performed a calibration analysis to evaluate the ability of these indexes to accurately predict insulin sensitivity as determined by the reference glucose clamp. Finally, to assess the reliability of these indexes for the identification of animals with impaired insulin sensitivity, performance of the indexes was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves in Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats. We found that HOMA-IR, QUICKI, and FGIR correlated significantly with SI(Clamp), exhibited good sensitivity and specificity, accurately predicted SI(Clamp), and yielded lower insulin sensitivity in pregnant than in nonpregnant rats. Together, our data demonstrate that these indexes provide an easy and accurate measure of insulin sensitivity during pregnancy in the rat.
胰岛素抵抗在包括妊娠期糖尿病在内的糖尿病发病机制中起作用。葡萄糖钳夹技术被认为是在人体和动物模型中测定体内胰岛素敏感性的金标准。然而,钳夹技术操作繁琐、耗时,并且在动物实验中需要麻醉和采集多个血样。在人体研究中,已经获得了一些基于空腹血糖和胰岛素水平的简单指标,并针对葡萄糖钳夹技术进行了验证。然而,这些指标尚未在大鼠中得到验证,其预测胰岛素敏感性改变的准确性仍有待确定。在本研究中,我们评估了基于空腹血糖和胰岛素水平的间接估计值是否是未怀孕和怀孕20天的Wistar和Sprague-Dawley大鼠胰岛素敏感性的有效预测指标。我们通过将胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)、定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数(QUICKI)和空腹血糖与胰岛素比值(FGIR)与高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹期间获得的胰岛素敏感性(SI(Clamp))值进行比较,对它们进行了分析。我们进行了校准分析,以评估这些指标准确预测由参考葡萄糖钳夹技术确定的胰岛素敏感性的能力。最后为了评估这些指标用于识别胰岛素敏感性受损动物的可靠性,通过Wistar和Sprague-Dawley大鼠的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析了这些指标的性能。我们发现HOMA-IR、QUICKI和FGIR与SI(Clamp)显著相关,表现出良好的敏感性和特异性,准确预测了SI(Clamp),并且怀孕大鼠的胰岛素敏感性低于未怀孕大鼠。总之,我们的数据表明,这些指标为大鼠孕期胰岛素敏感性提供了一种简便而准确的测量方法。