J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;16(5):229-34. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1992.16.5.229.
Research supported by a grant from Nicholas Institute of Sports Medicine and Athletic Trauma. With the trend in our society toward mainstreaming persons with mental retardation, there is a need to evaluate the efficacy of rehabilitation procedures for this population. The purpose of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of measurements determined with the Nicholas Manual Muscle Tester (MMT) and with the Cybex II isokinetic dynamometer using a sample of 20 adults without mental retardation and 10 adults with mental retardation. Utilizing stabilization techniques, knee extension and elbow flexion were measured with both dynamometers. The Nicholas MMT manifested excellent discriminatory function among subgroups. Correlational analyses between the dynamometers yielded coefficients of .74 and .77 for knee and elbow actions. Significant differences between dynamometers for the subgroups were found in three of the six analyses. Intrarater and interrater reliability coefficients were all greater than .90 for subjects with mental retardation. In conclusion, measurements of muscle strength obtained with the Nicholas MMT from subjects with and without mental retardation were reliable. The validity of this dynamometer assessed by construct and criterion processes was not conclusively established. This dynamometer, which is portable and relatively inexpensive, appears to be suitable as an assessment tool in clinical settings for persons with mental retardation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1992;16(5):229-234.
研究得到 Nicholas 运动医学和运动创伤研究所的资助。随着我们社会将智障人士纳入主流的趋势,有必要评估这种人群的康复程序的效果。本研究的目的是检验 Nicholas 手动肌肉测试器(MMT)和 Cybex II 等速测力仪的测量值的有效性和可靠性,研究对象为 20 名无智力障碍的成年人和 10 名有智力障碍的成年人。研究采用稳定技术,使用两种测力仪测量了膝关节伸展和肘关节弯曲。Nicholas MMT 在亚组之间表现出出色的区分功能。两种测力仪之间的相关分析得出膝关节和肘关节运动的系数分别为.74 和.77。在六项分析中的三项中,发现亚组之间的测力仪存在显著差异。对于智力障碍患者,主试者和被试者之间的可靠性系数均大于.90。总之,Nicholas MMT 从有无智力障碍的受试者中获得的肌肉力量测量值是可靠的。通过结构和标准过程评估的该测力仪的有效性尚未得到明确确立。这种便携且相对便宜的测力仪似乎适合作为智力障碍患者在临床环境中的评估工具。《矫形与运动物理治疗杂志》1992 年;16(5):229-234。