Pancera Christiane Finardi, Hayashi Massami, Fregnani José Humberto, Negri Elnara M, Deheinzelin Daniel, de Camargo Beatriz
Department of Pediatrics, CPediatric Intensive Care Unit, Entro de Tratamento e Pesquisa Hospital do Câncer AC Camargo, Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2008 Jul;30(7):533-8. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3181754198.
The experience of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the pediatric setting is limited. The aim of the present study is to retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of NPPV in pediatric immunocompromised patient admitted in our PICU (Pediatric Intensive Care Unit) for acute respiratory failure.
DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study of children admitted to the PICU of Hospital do Cancer between June 1997 and May 2005 requiring ventilatory support.
A total of 239 admissions were included. The first mechanical ventilation (MV) technique used was NPPV in 120 (50.2%) patients [noninvasive ventilation (NIV) group] and conventional MV in 119 (49.8%) [invasive ventilation (IV) group]; 25.8% of the patients from the NIV group subsequently required intubation. Patients in the IV group were more likely to be in a severe clinical status. Characteristics associated with severe clinical status were median value for therapeutic intervention scoring system score (37.5 points IV vs. 29 points NIV, P<0.0001), presence of >2 organs failure (63.6% IV vs. 36.4% NIV, P<0.0001), cardiac failure (62.5% IV vs. 37.5% NIV, P<0.0001), and septic shock (63.9% IV vs. 36.1% NIV, P<0.0001). Documented severe pulmonary disease was significantly higher (67.6%) in IV group, P=0.02. Baseline values of arterial pCO2, hypoxemia, arterial pH, and respiratory rate did not differ between the groups. Multivariate analysis showed that independent predictive factors for intubation were solid tumors (P=0.012), cardiovascular dysfunction (P<0.0001), and therapeutic intervention scoring system score >or=40 points (P=0.018).
Our results encourage the use of NPPV as a first-line treatment in children with malignancies who develops acute respiratory failure, except in those with severe hemodynamic status.
儿科无创正压通气(NPPV)的经验有限。本研究的目的是回顾性评估NPPV对入住我院儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的免疫功能低下的急性呼吸衰竭患儿的有效性。
设计/地点:对1997年6月至2005年5月入住癌症医院PICU需要通气支持的儿童进行回顾性队列研究。
共纳入239例入院病例。首次使用的机械通气(MV)技术中,120例(50.2%)患者采用NPPV[无创通气(NIV)组],119例(49.8%)采用传统MV[有创通气(IV)组];NIV组25.8%的患者随后需要插管。IV组患者的临床状态更严重。与严重临床状态相关的特征包括治疗干预评分系统评分的中位数(IV组37.5分,NIV组29分,P<0.0001)、存在>2个器官功能衰竭(IV组63.6%,NIV组36.4%,P<0.0001)、心力衰竭(IV组62.5%,NIV组37.5%,P<0.0001)和感染性休克(IV组63.9%,NIV组36.1%,P<