Terry A V, Warner S E, Vandenhuerk L, Pillai A, Mahadik S P, Zhang G, Bartlett M G
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912-2300, USA.
Neuroscience. 2008 Oct 28;156(4):1005-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.08.030. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
Learning potential and memory capacity are factors that strongly predict the level of rehabilitation and the long-term functional outcome in patients with schizophrenia. Unfortunately, however, the effects of antipsychotic drugs (i.e. the primary treatments for schizophrenia) on these components of cognition are unclear, particularly when they are administered chronically (i.e. a standard clinical practice). In this rodent study we evaluated the effects of different time periods (ranging from 2 weeks to 6 months) of oral treatment with the first generation antipsychotic chlorpromazine (10.0 mg/kg/day), or the second generation antipsychotic olanzapine (10.0 mg/kg/day) on the repeated acquisition of a water maze task (i.e. a method of assessing spatial learning potential in a repeated testing format). We assessed locomotor function (in an open field) and employed a radial arm maze (RAM) task to assess antipsychotic effects (5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg/day doses) on spatial working memory during the treatment period between 15 days and 2 months. Finally, we conducted experiments using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to evaluate the therapeutic relevance of our method of drug delivery (oral administration in drinking water). In the water maze experiments, both antipsychotics were associated with impairments in acquisition in the earlier test sessions that could eventually be overcome with repeated testing while olanzapine also impaired retention in probe trials. Both antipsychotics were also associated with impairments in delayed non-match-to-position trials in the RAM and some impairments of motor function (especially in the case of olanzapine) as indicated by slightly reduced swim speeds in the water maze and decreased activity in some components of the open field assessment. Finally, LC-MS/MS studies indicated that the method of antipsychotic administration generated clinically relevant plasma levels in the rat. These animal data indicate that chronic oral treatment with chlorpromazine or olanzapine can impair the performance of tasks designed to assess specific components of cognition that are affected in schizophrenia.
学习潜力和记忆能力是强烈预测精神分裂症患者康复水平和长期功能结局的因素。然而,不幸的是,抗精神病药物(即精神分裂症的主要治疗药物)对这些认知成分的影响尚不清楚,尤其是当长期给药时(即标准临床实践)。在这项啮齿动物研究中,我们评估了第一代抗精神病药物氯丙嗪(10.0毫克/千克/天)或第二代抗精神病药物奥氮平(10.0毫克/千克/天)口服治疗不同时间段(从2周至6个月)对水迷宫任务重复获取的影响(即一种以重复测试形式评估空间学习潜力的方法)。我们评估了运动功能(在旷场中),并采用放射状臂迷宫(RAM)任务来评估抗精神病药物(5.0和10.0毫克/千克/天剂量)在15天至2个月的治疗期间对空间工作记忆的影响。最后,我们使用液相色谱/串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)进行实验,以评估我们的药物递送方法(饮用水口服给药)的治疗相关性。在水迷宫实验中,两种抗精神病药物在早期测试阶段均与获取障碍相关,而这种障碍最终可通过重复测试克服,同时奥氮平在探针试验中也损害了记忆保持。两种抗精神病药物还与RAM中延迟的位置不匹配试验障碍以及一些运动功能障碍相关(尤其是奥氮平的情况),水迷宫中游泳速度略有降低以及旷场评估某些成分中的活动减少表明了这一点。最后,LC-MS/MS研究表明抗精神病药物的给药方法在大鼠体内产生了临床相关血浆水平。这些动物数据表明,氯丙嗪或奥氮平的长期口服治疗会损害旨在评估精神分裂症中受影响的特定认知成分的任务表现。