Natarajan Adayapalam T, Palitti Fabrizio
Department of Agrobiology and Agrochemistry, University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo de lellis, 011000, Viterbo, Italy.
Mutat Res. 2008 Nov 17;657(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.08.017. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
All mutagenic agents induce lesions in the cellular DNA and they are repaired efficiently by different repair mechanisms. Un-repaired and mis-repaired lesions lead to chromosomal aberrations (CAs). Depending upon the mutagenic agents involved, different DNA repair pathways, such as nucleotide excision repair (NER), base excision repair (BER), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination repair (HRR), cross-link repair (FANC), single strand annealing (SSA) etc., are operative. Following ionising radiation, DNA double strand breaks (DSBs, which are considered to be the most important leasion leading to observed biological effects) are repaired either by NHEJ and/or HRR. We have investigated the relative role of these two repair pathways leading to chromosomal aberrations using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) mutant cells deficient in one of these two repair pathwatys. NHEJ operates both in G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle, wheras HHR operates mainly in S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. In NHEJ-deficient mutant cells irradiated in G1, un-repaired double strand breaks reaching S phase are repaired (unexpectedly with a large mis-repair component) by HRR. In HRR-deficient mutant cells, un-repaired DSBs reaching S phase are repaired by NHEJ (unexpectedly with a low mis-repair component) as evidenced by the frequencies of chromatid type aberrations. Employing a similar approach, following treatment with benzo(alpha)pyrene-7,8diol-9,10epoxide (BPDE), the active metabolite of benzo(alpha)pyrene, NER and HRR seem to be the most important repair pathways protecting against chromosomal damage induced by this agent. In the case of acetaldehyde, (primary metabolite of alcohol in vivo) a DNA cross-linking agent, HRR and FANC pathways are important for protection against damage induced by this agent. Irrespective of the type of DNA lesions induced, ultimately they have to be converted to DSBs in order to give rise to CA. Therefore, both NHEJ and HRR are also involved to some extent in the origin of CA following treatment with S-dependent agents.The relative importance of different repair pathways in bestowing protection against DNA damage leading to chromosomal alterations is discussed.
所有诱变剂都会在细胞DNA中诱导损伤,而这些损伤会通过不同的修复机制得到有效修复。未修复和错配修复的损伤会导致染色体畸变(CA)。根据所涉及的诱变剂不同,不同的DNA修复途径,如核苷酸切除修复(NER)、碱基切除修复(BER)、非同源末端连接(NHEJ)、同源重组修复(HRR)、交联修复(FANC)、单链退火(SSA)等,都会发挥作用。在受到电离辐射后,DNA双链断裂(DSB,被认为是导致观察到的生物学效应的最重要损伤)会通过NHEJ和/或HRR进行修复。我们使用缺乏这两种修复途径之一的中国仓鼠卵巢(CHO)突变细胞,研究了这两种修复途径在导致染色体畸变方面的相对作用。NHEJ在细胞周期的G1期和G2期都起作用,而HRR主要在细胞周期的S期和G2期起作用。在G1期受到照射的NHEJ缺陷型突变细胞中,进入S期的未修复双链断裂会由HRR修复(意外地带有大量错配修复成分)。在HRR缺陷型突变细胞中,进入S期的未修复DSB会由NHEJ修复(意外地带有低错配修复成分),这在染色单体型畸变的频率中得到了证实。采用类似的方法,在用苯并[a]芘的活性代谢物苯并[a]芘-7,8-二醇-9,10-环氧化物(BPDE)处理后,NER和HRR似乎是防止该试剂诱导染色体损伤的最重要修复途径。对于乙醛(体内酒精的主要代谢产物,一种DNA交联剂),HRR和FANC途径对于防止该试剂诱导的损伤很重要。无论诱导的DNA损伤类型如何,最终它们都必须转化为DSB才能产生CA。因此,在用S依赖性试剂处理后,NHEJ和HRR在CA的起源中也都在一定程度上有所涉及。讨论了不同修复途径在赋予对导致染色体改变的DNA损伤的保护方面的相对重要性。