Suppr超能文献

开放式自我描述中思维的揭示维度:一种自然语言的自动意义提取方法

Revealing Dimensions of Thinking in Open-Ended Self-Descriptions: An Automated Meaning Extraction Method for Natural Language.

出版信息

J Res Pers. 2008 Feb;42(1):96-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.006.

Abstract

A new method for extracting common themes from written text is introduced and applied to 1,165 open-ended self-descriptive narratives. Drawing on a lexical approach to personality, the most commonly-used adjectives within narratives written by college students were identified using computerized text analytic tools. A factor analysis on the use of these adjectives in the self-descriptions produced a 7-factor solution consisting of psychologically meaningful dimensions. Some dimensions were unipolar (e.g., Negativity factor, wherein most loaded items were negatively valenced adjectives); others were dimensional in that semantically opposite words clustered together (e.g., Sociability factor, wherein terms such as shy, outgoing, reserved, and loud all loaded in the same direction). The factors exhibited modest reliability across different types of writ writing samples and were correlated with self-reports and behaviors consistent with the dimensions. Similar analyses with additional content words (adjectives, adverbs, nouns, and verbs) yielded additional psychological dimensions associated with physical appearance, school, relationships, etc. in which people contextualize their self-concepts. The results suggest that the meaning extraction method is a promising strategy that determines the dimensions along which people think about themselves.

摘要

本文介绍了一种从书面文本中提取共同主题的新方法,并将其应用于1165篇开放式自我描述性叙事中。基于词汇学的人格研究方法,利用计算机文本分析工具识别大学生所写叙事中最常用的形容词。对这些形容词在自我描述中的使用情况进行因子分析,得到了一个由七个心理意义维度组成的解决方案。有些维度是单极的(例如消极性因子,其中大多数载荷项都是负价形容词);其他维度则是双向的,即语义相反的词聚集在一起(例如社交性因子,其中害羞、外向、矜持和开朗等词都朝同一方向载荷)。这些因子在不同类型的写作样本中表现出适度的可靠性,并与自我报告以及与这些维度一致的行为相关。对其他内容词(形容词、副词、名词和动词)进行类似分析,得出了与外貌、学校、人际关系等相关的额外心理维度,人们在这些维度中构建自己的自我概念。结果表明,意义提取方法是一种很有前景的策略,它能确定人们思考自身的维度。

相似文献

5
Processing symbolic magnitude information conveyed by number words and by scalar adjectives.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Mar;75(3):422-449. doi: 10.1177/17470218211031158. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
7
Measuring word retrieval in narrative discourse: core lexicon in aphasia.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 Jan;54(1):62-78. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12432. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Dec;77(6):1296-312. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1296.
9
When small words foretell academic success: the case of college admissions essays.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 31;9(12):e115844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115844. eCollection 2014.
10
A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits based on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;94(2):347-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.347.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural Language Processing of Sentiments Identified in Patient Comments Associated with Less Than Top-Rated Care.
J Patient Exp. 2025 Mar 21;12:23743735251323677. doi: 10.1177/23743735251323677. eCollection 2025.
3
From complexity to clarity: How AI enhances perceptions of scientists and the public's understanding of science.
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 6;3(9):pgae387. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae387. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Understanding the impact of community-based sun safety interventions on a college campus in Texas.
J Am Coll Health. 2024 Jul 12:1-8. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2024.2367989.
6
Reading dies in complexity: Online news consumers prefer simple writing.
Sci Adv. 2024 Jun 7;10(23):eadn2555. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn2555. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
8
Online Dating Profile Content of Older Adults Seeking Same- and Cross-Sex Relationships.
J GLBT Fam Stud. 2018;14(5):446-466. doi: 10.1080/1550428x.2017.1393362. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
9
Do expressive writing interventions have positive effects on Koreans?: a meta-analysis.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 23;14:1204053. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1204053. eCollection 2023.
10
Cross-checking journalistic fact-checkers: The role of sampling and scaling in interpreting false and misleading statements.
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 25;18(7):e0289004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289004. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
2
In praise of clinical judgment: Meehl's forgotten legacy.
J Clin Psychol. 2005 Oct;61(10):1257-76. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20181.
3
When clinical description becomes statistical prediction.
Am Psychol. 2004 Oct;59(7):595-613. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.595.
4
Coh-metrix: analysis of text on cohesion and language.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 May;36(2):193-202. doi: 10.3758/bf03195564.
5
AutoTutor: a tutor with dialogue in natural language.
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 May;36(2):180-92. doi: 10.3758/bf03195563.
6
e-Perceptions: personality impressions based on personal websites.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jul;87(1):123-32. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.123.
7
Bridging the idiographic-nomothetic divide in ratings of self and others on the Big Five.
J Pers. 2004 Apr;72(2):203-41. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00261.x.
8
Factor structure of English-language personality type-nouns.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Oct;85(4):695-708. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.695.
10
Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:547-77. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041. Epub 2002 Jun 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验