• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Revealing Dimensions of Thinking in Open-Ended Self-Descriptions: An Automated Meaning Extraction Method for Natural Language.开放式自我描述中思维的揭示维度:一种自然语言的自动意义提取方法
J Res Pers. 2008 Feb;42(1):96-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.006.
2
Personality in Swahili culture: A psycho-lexical approach to trait structure in a language deprived of typical trait-descriptive adjectives.斯瓦希里文化中的人格:一种缺失典型特质描述形容词的语言中的特质结构的心理词汇方法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Aug;127(2):384-403. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000514.
3
Validation of Two Short Personality Inventories Using Self-Descriptions in Natural Language and Quantitative Semantics Test Theory.使用自然语言自我描述和定量语义测试理论对两份简短人格量表的验证
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 19;11:16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00016. eCollection 2020.
4
What relationships exist between nouns and verbs and the use of prepositions, adverbs, and adjectives in children and adolescents who use speech generating devices?名词和动词之间存在什么关系,以及使用言语生成设备的儿童和青少年如何使用介词、副词和形容词?
Augment Altern Commun. 2024 Dec;40(4):306-313. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2024.2348996. Epub 2024 May 22.
5
Processing symbolic magnitude information conveyed by number words and by scalar adjectives.处理由数字词和标量形容词传达的符号大小信息。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Mar;75(3):422-449. doi: 10.1177/17470218211031158. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
6
Qualitative Study定性研究
7
Measuring word retrieval in narrative discourse: core lexicon in aphasia.测量叙事话语中的词汇提取:失语症的核心词汇。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 Jan;54(1):62-78. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12432. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference.语言风格:作为个体差异的语言运用
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Dec;77(6):1296-312. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1296.
9
When small words foretell academic success: the case of college admissions essays.小词汇如何预示学术成功:以大学申请文书为例
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 31;9(12):e115844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115844. eCollection 2014.
10
A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits based on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors.基于一份全面且无限制的描述词列表的荷兰人格特质新分类法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;94(2):347-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.347.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural Language Processing of Sentiments Identified in Patient Comments Associated with Less Than Top-Rated Care.与非顶级护理相关的患者评论中所识别情绪的自然语言处理
J Patient Exp. 2025 Mar 21;12:23743735251323677. doi: 10.1177/23743735251323677. eCollection 2025.
2
Understanding Pediatric Experiences With Symptomatic Varicoceles: Mixed Methods Study of an Online Varicocele Community.理解小儿精索静脉曲张症状的体验:精索静脉曲张在线社区的混合方法研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 10;8:e50141. doi: 10.2196/50141.
3
From complexity to clarity: How AI enhances perceptions of scientists and the public's understanding of science.从复杂到清晰:人工智能如何提升科学家的认知以及公众对科学的理解。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 6;3(9):pgae387. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae387. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Implementation and Evaluation of a Multi-level, Place-Based Tobacco Prevention and Control Program at a Minority-Serving Institution in Texas.德克萨斯州一少数族裔服务机构实施和评估多层次、基于场所的烟草预防和控制项目。
Prev Sci. 2024 Aug;25(6):898-909. doi: 10.1007/s11121-024-01708-4. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
5
Understanding the impact of community-based sun safety interventions on a college campus in Texas.了解基于社区的阳光安全干预措施对德克萨斯州一所大学校园的影响。
J Am Coll Health. 2024 Jul 12:1-8. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2024.2367989.
6
Reading dies in complexity: Online news consumers prefer simple writing.阅读死于复杂:网络新闻消费者偏好简洁写作。
Sci Adv. 2024 Jun 7;10(23):eadn2555. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn2555. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
7
Toxic Relationships Described by People With Breast Cancer on Reddit: Topic Modeling Study.乳腺癌患者在Reddit上描述的有毒关系:主题建模研究
JMIR Cancer. 2024 Feb 23;10:e48860. doi: 10.2196/48860.
8
Online Dating Profile Content of Older Adults Seeking Same- and Cross-Sex Relationships.寻求同性和异性关系的老年人的在线约会资料内容。
J GLBT Fam Stud. 2018;14(5):446-466. doi: 10.1080/1550428x.2017.1393362. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
9
Do expressive writing interventions have positive effects on Koreans?: a meta-analysis.表达性写作干预对韩国人有积极影响吗?一项荟萃分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 23;14:1204053. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1204053. eCollection 2023.
10
Cross-checking journalistic fact-checkers: The role of sampling and scaling in interpreting false and misleading statements.交叉核对新闻事实核查者:解释虚假和误导性陈述中抽样和定标的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 25;18(7):e0289004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289004. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
2
In praise of clinical judgment: Meehl's forgotten legacy.赞颂临床判断:米尔被遗忘的遗产。
J Clin Psychol. 2005 Oct;61(10):1257-76. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20181.
3
When clinical description becomes statistical prediction.当临床描述变成统计预测时。
Am Psychol. 2004 Oct;59(7):595-613. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.595.
4
Coh-metrix: analysis of text on cohesion and language.Coh - metrix:衔接与语言文本分析
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 May;36(2):193-202. doi: 10.3758/bf03195564.
5
AutoTutor: a tutor with dialogue in natural language.自动辅导器:一个具有自然语言对话功能的辅导器。
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 May;36(2):180-92. doi: 10.3758/bf03195563.
6
e-Perceptions: personality impressions based on personal websites.电子感知:基于个人网站的个性印象。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jul;87(1):123-32. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.123.
7
Bridging the idiographic-nomothetic divide in ratings of self and others on the Big Five.弥合在大五人格维度上对自我与他人评价中的独特性-普遍性差异
J Pers. 2004 Apr;72(2):203-41. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00261.x.
8
Factor structure of English-language personality type-nouns.英语中人格类型名词的因素结构。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Oct;85(4):695-708. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.695.
9
Assessing personality disorders using a systematic clinical interview: evaluation of an alternative to structured interviews.使用系统临床访谈评估人格障碍:对结构化访谈替代方法的评估
J Pers Disord. 2003 Aug;17(4):351-69. doi: 10.1521/pedi.17.4.351.23967.
10
Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves.自然语言使用的心理层面:我们的言语,我们自身。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:547-77. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041. Epub 2002 Jun 10.

开放式自我描述中思维的揭示维度:一种自然语言的自动意义提取方法

Revealing Dimensions of Thinking in Open-Ended Self-Descriptions: An Automated Meaning Extraction Method for Natural Language.

出版信息

J Res Pers. 2008 Feb;42(1):96-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.006.

DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.006
PMID:18802499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2542899/
Abstract

A new method for extracting common themes from written text is introduced and applied to 1,165 open-ended self-descriptive narratives. Drawing on a lexical approach to personality, the most commonly-used adjectives within narratives written by college students were identified using computerized text analytic tools. A factor analysis on the use of these adjectives in the self-descriptions produced a 7-factor solution consisting of psychologically meaningful dimensions. Some dimensions were unipolar (e.g., Negativity factor, wherein most loaded items were negatively valenced adjectives); others were dimensional in that semantically opposite words clustered together (e.g., Sociability factor, wherein terms such as shy, outgoing, reserved, and loud all loaded in the same direction). The factors exhibited modest reliability across different types of writ writing samples and were correlated with self-reports and behaviors consistent with the dimensions. Similar analyses with additional content words (adjectives, adverbs, nouns, and verbs) yielded additional psychological dimensions associated with physical appearance, school, relationships, etc. in which people contextualize their self-concepts. The results suggest that the meaning extraction method is a promising strategy that determines the dimensions along which people think about themselves.

摘要

本文介绍了一种从书面文本中提取共同主题的新方法,并将其应用于1165篇开放式自我描述性叙事中。基于词汇学的人格研究方法,利用计算机文本分析工具识别大学生所写叙事中最常用的形容词。对这些形容词在自我描述中的使用情况进行因子分析,得到了一个由七个心理意义维度组成的解决方案。有些维度是单极的(例如消极性因子,其中大多数载荷项都是负价形容词);其他维度则是双向的,即语义相反的词聚集在一起(例如社交性因子,其中害羞、外向、矜持和开朗等词都朝同一方向载荷)。这些因子在不同类型的写作样本中表现出适度的可靠性,并与自我报告以及与这些维度一致的行为相关。对其他内容词(形容词、副词、名词和动词)进行类似分析,得出了与外貌、学校、人际关系等相关的额外心理维度,人们在这些维度中构建自己的自我概念。结果表明,意义提取方法是一种很有前景的策略,它能确定人们思考自身的维度。