• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

光斑贴试验:德国、奥地利和瑞士光斑贴试验小组的5年经验

Photopatch testing: the 5-year experience of the German, Austrian, and Swiss Photopatch Test Group.

作者信息

Hölzle E, Neumann N, Hausen B, Przybilla B, Schauder S, Hönigsmann H, Bircher A, Plewig G

机构信息

Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, F.R.G.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991 Jul;25(1 Pt 1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(91)70175-2.

DOI:10.1016/0190-9622(91)70175-2
PMID:1880256
Abstract

A cooperative photopatch test study was conducted by 45 dermatologic centers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Results obtained from 1985 to 1990 are presented. A standard photopatch test tray of 32 substances was applied to the back of patients with suspected photosensivity. After applications for 24 hours, test sites were irradiated with 10 joules/cm2UVA. Unirradiated controls were included. Readings were performed immediately and 24, 48, and 72 hours after irradiation; responses were qualitatively graded on a 4-point scale. All data were stored and processed by a computer. With computer-assisted analysis of reaction patterns photoallergic reactions were identified and distinguished from phototoxic reactions. Data of 1129 patients were evaluated. Among a total of 2859 positive test reactions in 870 patients, 2041 in 778 patients were found to be photoinduced and 818 in 413 patients were contact reactions; 108 reactions in 83 patients were classified as photoallergic. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, disinfectants, sunscreens, phenothiazines, and fragrances caused most often photoallergic reactions. Many unspecific phototoxic reactions were induced by tiaprofenic acid, promethazine, carprofen, chlorpromazine, fenticolar, wood balsam of Peru, and perfumes. Despite the distinction between photoallergic and phototoxic responses, many test reactions lacked relevance for the patients' dermatoses.

摘要

奥地利、德国和瑞士的45个皮肤科中心开展了一项合作性光斑贴试验研究。文中呈现了1985年至1990年期间获得的结果。将一个包含32种物质的标准光斑贴试验托盘贴于疑似光敏性患者的背部。敷用24小时后,对试验部位照射10焦耳/平方厘米的紫外线A。设置未照射的对照。分别在照射后即刻、24、48和72小时进行读数;反应按4级进行定性分级。所有数据均由计算机存储和处理。通过计算机辅助分析反应模式,识别光变应性反应并将其与光毒性反应区分开来。对1129例患者的数据进行了评估。在870例患者的总共2859次阳性试验反应中,778例患者的2041次反应被发现是光诱导的,413例患者的818次反应是接触性反应;83例患者的108次反应被归类为光变应性。非甾体抗炎药、消毒剂、防晒霜、吩噻嗪类和香料最常引起光变应性反应。许多非特异性光毒性反应由噻洛芬酸、异丙嗪、卡洛芬、氯丙嗪、芬替克洛、秘鲁香脂和香水诱发。尽管区分了光变应性和光毒性反应,但许多试验反应与患者的皮肤病无关。

相似文献

1
Photopatch testing: the 5-year experience of the German, Austrian, and Swiss Photopatch Test Group.光斑贴试验:德国、奥地利和瑞士光斑贴试验小组的5年经验
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991 Jul;25(1 Pt 1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(91)70175-2.
2
Photopatch testing: the 12-year experience of the German, Austrian, and Swiss photopatch test group.光斑贴试验:德国、奥地利和瑞士光斑贴试验小组的12年经验
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000 Feb;42(2 Pt 1):183-92. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(00)90124-5.
3
The photopatch test procedure of the German, Austrian, and Swiss photopatch test group.德国、奥地利和瑞士光斑贴试验小组的光斑贴试验程序。
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2003 Feb;19(1):8-10. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0781.2003.00008.x.
4
Pattern analysis of photopatch test reactions.光斑贴试验反应的模式分析
Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 1994 Apr;10(2):65-73.
5
How to avoid phototoxic reactions in photopatch testing with chlorpromazine.如何在使用氯丙嗪进行光斑贴试验时避免光毒性反应。
Photodermatol. 1985 Apr;2(2):95-100.
6
Photopatch testing: a six-year experience.光斑贴试验:六年经验总结
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988 May;18(5 Pt 1):1044-7. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(88)70102-4.
7
[Photosensitizing properties of nonsteroidal antirheumatic drugs in the photopatch test].[非甾体类抗风湿药物在光斑贴试验中的光敏特性]
Hautarzt. 1987 Jan;38(1):18-25.
8
Dioxopromethazine-induced photoallergic contact dermatitis followed by persistent light reaction.二氧丙嗪引起的光变应性接触性皮炎继发持久性光反应。
Am J Contact Dermat. 1998 Sep;9(3):182-7.
9
Standard photopatch testing with Waxtar, para-aminobenzoic acid, potassium dichromate and balsam of Peru.
Contact Dermatitis. 1983 Jan;9(1):5-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1983.tb04619.x.
10
Evaluation of photopatch test allergens for Indian patients of photodermatitis: preliminary results.光接触性皮炎印度患者的光斑贴试验变应原评估:初步结果。
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011 Mar-Apr;77(2):148-55. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.77453.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Hydroxysafflor Yellow A (HSYA) on UVA-Induced Damage in HaCaT Keratinocytes.羟基红花黄色素 A(HSYA)对 UVA 诱导的 HaCaT 角质形成细胞损伤的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 10;25(14):7573. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147573.
2
Update on Quinolone Allergy.喹诺酮类药物过敏的最新情况。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017 Aug;17(8):56. doi: 10.1007/s11882-017-0725-y.
3
Topical pine tar: History, properties and use as a treatment for common skin conditions.外用松焦油:历史、特性及其作为常见皮肤病治疗方法的应用。
Australas J Dermatol. 2017 May;58(2):80-85. doi: 10.1111/ajd.12427. Epub 2016 Jan 20.