Ali Ahsan T, McLeod Nathan, Kalapatapu Venkat R, Moursi Mohammad M, Eidt John F
Division of Vascular Surgery, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Nov;48(5):1125-30; discussion 1130-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.06.067. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
The neoaortoiliac system (NAIS) has gained popularity as a durable procedure for treating aortic graft infections. However, one of the disadvantages has been a long operation that can take up to 10 hours. The goal of this study was to assess the feasibility of staging the NAIS procedure with deep vein harvest a day before the aortofemoral bypass and evaluate if staging had any effect on graft patency or morbidity and mortality, or both.
We reviewed data for all the NAIS procedures performed for aortic graft infections at a tertiary care university hospital. The femoral popliteal veins of patients undergoing the staged NAIS were harvested a day in advance and left in situ. The next day patients underwent the prosthetic graft excision with reconstruction using the femoral popliteal veins. Patients with aortic occlusion on presentation were not candidates for vein harvest in advance and underwent a unilateral bypass with a subsequent femorofemoral bypass as a second stage.
In the last 8 years, 26 patients (17 men, 9 women; mean age, 62.6 +/- 8.3 years) underwent the NAIS procedure for aortic graft infections. Mean follow-up was 15.7 months. Primary assisted graft patency was 100%. There were 11 patients in the staged group and 10 patients in the nonstaged group. All the staged patients underwent vein mobilization a day before excision of aortic prosthesis. Despite undergoing a separate procedure for vein harvesting at a different time, there was no difference in total operative time (12.0 +/- 1.8 vs 11.9 +/- 2.2 hours), operative blood loss (2.6 +/- 1.2 vs 3.4 +/- 2.4 L), and requirements for transfusion for blood products (6.7 +/- 3.7 vs 6.0 +/- 5.4 U) or crystalloid (11.3 +/- 3.1 vs 10.9 +/- 2.4 L) between the staged group and nonstaged groups. One amputation occurred in each group. The perioperative mortality was 18% for the staged group and 20% for nonstaged group. The 12-month survival was 72% for staged and 70% for nonstaged NAIS. No graft-related complications were observed from the preoperative vein harvest.
The NAIS can be staged without compromising the efficacy of the procedure as evident by excellent long-term patency and control of the infection. By reducing the duration of the primary procedure, staging may be beneficial to both the patient and the surgeon.
新主动脉髂动脉系统(NAIS)作为治疗主动脉移植物感染的一种持久术式已受到广泛关注。然而,其缺点之一是手术时间长,可达10小时。本研究的目的是评估在主动脉股动脉旁路手术前一天分期进行NAIS手术并采集深静脉的可行性,并评估分期是否对移植物通畅率、发病率和死亡率有影响,或对两者均有影响。
我们回顾了一家三级医疗大学医院为主动脉移植物感染进行的所有NAIS手术的数据。接受分期NAIS手术的患者的股腘静脉提前一天采集并留在原位。第二天,患者接受人工血管切除并使用股腘静脉进行重建。就诊时主动脉闭塞的患者不适合提前采集静脉,先进行单侧旁路手术,随后作为第二阶段进行股股旁路手术。
在过去8年中,26例患者(17例男性,9例女性;平均年龄62.6±8.3岁)因主动脉移植物感染接受了NAIS手术。平均随访15.7个月。一期辅助移植物通畅率为100%。分期组有11例患者,非分期组有10例患者。所有分期患者在切除主动脉假体前一天进行了静脉游离。尽管在不同时间进行了单独的静脉采集手术,但分期组和非分期组在总手术时间(12.0±1.8 vs 11.9±2.2小时)、术中失血量(2.6±1.2 vs 3.4±2.4 L)、血液制品输注需求量(6.7±3.7 vs 6.0±5.4 U)或晶体液输注需求量(11.3±3.1 vs 10.9±2.4 L)方面均无差异。每组各有1例截肢。分期组围手术期死亡率为18%,非分期组为20%。分期NAIS和非分期NAIS的12个月生存率分别为72%和70%。术前静脉采集未观察到与移植物相关的并发症。
NAIS可以分期进行,而不会影响手术效果,长期通畅率良好且感染得到控制即可证明这一点。通过缩短一期手术时间,分期可能对患者和外科医生都有益。