Simmons Christian D, Ali Ahsan T, Foteh Kousta, Abate Matthew R, Smeds Matthew R, Spencer Horace J, Clagett G Patrick
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Ark.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Ark.
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Apr;65(4):1121-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.051. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
Aortic graft infection remains a formidable challenge for the vascular surgeon. Traditionally, reconstruction with a neoaortoiliac system (NAIS) involves removal of the entire synthetic graft with in situ reconstruction using femoral vein. Whereas the NAIS procedure is durable with excellent graft patency and a low reinfection rate, it can take up to 10 hours and result in a high perioperative complication rate with significant mortality. Not infrequently, the infection is limited to a single limb. In addition, the patient may be too frail to tolerate aortic clamping for a complete graft excision. Under such circumstances, complete excision of the aortofemoral bypass graft (AFBG) may not be indicated. It is hypothesized that local control of infection and limited reconstruction using femoral vein may be acceptable. The objective of this study was to examine the outcomes of all patients who underwent partial AFBG resection and in situ reconstruction with femoral vein.
A retrospective review of all AFBG infections from 2003 to 2015 treated at a tertiary care facility was undertaken. Patients who underwent unilateral partial graft excision with inline reconstruction using femoral vein at the distal (femoral) anastomosis were included. Complete excisions with bilateral revascularizations using any conduit or any extra-anatomic reconstructions were excluded. The primary end point was successful treatment of infection. Secondary end points were procedure-related mortality, graft patency, and perioperative complications.
During a 12-year period, partial graft excision with bypass using the femoral vein was performed in 21 patients (24 limbs). Mean age was 61 ± 12 years. There were 13 men and 8 women. Mean follow-up was 53 ± 27 months. Successful treatment was achieved in 19 of 21 patients. The two treatment failures were due to persistent infection. One of these patients declined complete graft excision and is receiving lifelong suppressive antibiotic therapy. The other patient underwent complete graft excision and an NAIS reconstruction. There were no perioperative or procedure-related deaths. There were no major amputations, and primary graft patency was 92% at 72 months. The most common AFBG culture isolate was Staphylococcus species. Approximately one-third of cultures did not yield any growth. Patients underwent anywhere from 1 to 12 weeks of combined intravenous and oral antibiotic therapy.
This limited series demonstrates excellent graft patency with a low persistent infection rate. Thus, in patients with localized graft infection, partial excision with preservation of the proximal synthetic graft is an acceptable alternative when patient factors preclude complete graft excision.
主动脉移植物感染对血管外科医生来说仍然是一项艰巨的挑战。传统上,采用新主动脉髂血管系统(NAIS)进行重建需要切除整个合成移植物,并使用股静脉进行原位重建。尽管NAIS手术效果持久,移植物通畅率高且再感染率低,但手术可能需要长达10小时,围手术期并发症发生率高,死亡率也显著。感染通常局限于单肢的情况并不少见。此外,患者可能过于虚弱,无法耐受主动脉阻断以完成移植物的完全切除。在这种情况下,可能不需要完全切除主动脉股动脉旁路移植物(AFBG)。据推测,局部控制感染并使用股静脉进行有限的重建可能是可行的。本研究的目的是检查所有接受部分AFBG切除并使用股静脉进行原位重建的患者的治疗结果。
对2003年至2015年在一家三级医疗机构治疗的所有AFBG感染病例进行回顾性研究。纳入在远端(股部)吻合口采用股静脉进行单侧部分移植物切除并原位重建的患者。排除使用任何管道进行双侧血管重建的完全切除病例或任何解剖外重建病例。主要终点是感染的成功治疗。次要终点是手术相关死亡率、移植物通畅率和围手术期并发症。
在12年期间,21例患者(24条肢体)接受了使用股静脉旁路的部分移植物切除手术。平均年龄为61±12岁。男性13例,女性8例。平均随访时间为53±27个月。21例患者中有19例获得了成功治疗。2例治疗失败是由于感染持续存在。其中1例患者拒绝完全切除移植物,正在接受终身抑制性抗生素治疗。另1例患者接受了移植物完全切除及NAIS重建。无围手术期或手术相关死亡病例。无大截肢病例,72个月时原发性移植物通畅率为92%。AFBG培养最常见的分离菌是葡萄球菌属。约三分之一的培养物未生长出任何细菌。患者接受了1至12周的静脉和口服联合抗生素治疗。
这个有限的系列研究显示移植物通畅率高,持续感染率低。因此,对于局限性移植物感染患者,当患者因素不允许完全切除移植物时,保留近端合成移植物进行部分切除是一种可接受的替代方法。