Department of Vascular Surgery, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Biometrics and Clinical Epidemiology and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Vascular. 2023 Oct;31(5):850-857. doi: 10.1177/17085381221091372. Epub 2022 May 13.
To report and compare neoaortoiliac system reconstruction and cryopreserved human allograft in treating aortic graft infections.
We retrospectively analysed the data of the patients treated for aorto graft infections between January 2015 and May 2021 in our hospital. The clinical data, diagnostic procedures, and surgical options were evaluated. The primary endpoint of this study was the 30-day and 1-year mortality; secondary endpoints were major postoperative complications.
We retrospectively reviewed a series of 31 consecutive patients (28 males; median age 72 years, range, 50-87 years) with aortic graft infection treated with NAIS (n = 20, 65%) or cryopreserved allograft (n = 11, 36%). The clinical presentation included fever attacks in 18 (58%) patients, abdominal pain in 15 (48%) patients, haemodynamic instability in 6 (19%) patients, and haematemesis in 2 (7%) patients. The median operative time of the NAIS was longer than CHA without a statistically significant difference (458 min vs. 359 min, p = .505). The postoperative morbidity for all patients was 81%, with no significant difference between NAIS and CHA groups (85% vs. 73%, p = .638). There was no limb thrombosis of the new reconstructions. Limb loss occurred in 4 (13%) patients, including 2 (10%) NAIS patients and 2 (18%) CHA patients. One NAIS patient developed complications in the form of a distal (femoral) disruption of the vein 15 days after surgery. There were no significant differences between NAIS and CHA groups in ICU stay (12 vs 8 days, .984) but in hospitalization (22 vs 33, p = .033). The most common bacteria isolated were staphylococci strains in 15 (48%). In 13 (36%) patients, candida was positive. The in-hospital 30-day and 1-year mortality for all patients was 16% (5/31) and 29% (9/31), with no significant differences between NAIS and CHA at 30 days (25% vs. 0, p = .133) or 1 year (35% vs. 18%, .429). Five NAIS patients died during the hospital stay; three of them had end-of-life decisions. After a median follow-up of 16 months (1-66 months), 12 (39%) patients died, including 9 patients with NAIS and 3 with CHA reconstructions. The causes of death included overwhelming sepsis in 5 (42%) patients, graft disruption in one (8%) NAIS patient, non-small cell lung cancer in one (8%) patient, COVID-19 in one (8%) patient and unknown causes (8%) in one.
Non-staged neoaortoiliac system reconstruction and cryopreserved human allografts show comparable short- and midterm results for treating aortic graft infections. However, both procedures remain challenging with high morbidity and mortality rates.
报告并比较重建新式腹主动脉-髂动脉系统和冷冻保存同种异体移植物在治疗主动脉移植物感染中的应用。
我们回顾性分析了 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 5 月期间我院收治的主动脉移植物感染患者的临床资料。评估了临床数据、诊断程序和手术选择。本研究的主要终点为 30 天和 1 年死亡率;次要终点为主要术后并发症。
我们回顾性分析了 31 例连续主动脉移植物感染患者(28 例男性;中位年龄 72 岁,范围 50-87 岁),采用新式腹主动脉-髂动脉系统重建(n=20,65%)或冷冻保存同种异体移植物(n=11,36%)治疗。临床表现包括发热发作 18 例(58%)、腹痛 15 例(48%)、血流动力学不稳定 6 例(19%)和呕血 2 例(7%)。新式腹主动脉-髂动脉系统重建的手术时间中位数长于冷冻保存同种异体移植物,但无统计学差异(458 分钟 vs. 359 分钟,p=0.505)。所有患者的术后发病率为 81%,新式腹主动脉-髂动脉系统重建组和冷冻保存同种异体移植物组之间无显著差异(85%vs.73%,p=0.638)。新重建的肢体均无血栓形成。4 例(13%)患者发生肢体丧失,包括 2 例(10%)新式腹主动脉-髂动脉系统重建患者和 2 例(18%)冷冻保存同种异体移植物患者。1 例新式腹主动脉-髂动脉系统重建患者术后 15 天出现静脉远端(股部)破裂并发症。新式腹主动脉-髂动脉系统重建组和冷冻保存同种异体移植物组在 ICU 住院时间(12 天 vs. 8 天,p=0.984)和住院时间(22 天 vs. 33 天,p=0.033)方面无显著差异。最常见的分离细菌是葡萄球菌,15 例(48%)。13 例(36%)患者为假丝酵母菌阳性。所有患者的院内 30 天和 1 年死亡率分别为 16%(5/31)和 29%(9/31),新式腹主动脉-髂动脉系统重建组和冷冻保存同种异体移植物组在 30 天(25%vs.0,p=0.133)或 1 年(35%vs.18%,p=0.429)时均无显著差异。5 例新式腹主动脉-髂动脉系统重建患者在住院期间死亡;其中 3 例患者作出了临终决定。中位随访 16 个月(1-66 个月)后,12 例(39%)患者死亡,包括 9 例新式腹主动脉-髂动脉系统重建患者和 3 例冷冻保存同种异体移植物患者。死亡原因包括 5 例(42%)患者发生严重败血症、1 例(8%)新式腹主动脉-髂动脉系统重建患者发生移植物破裂、1 例(8%)患者发生非小细胞肺癌、1 例(8%)患者发生 COVID-19 和 1 例(8%)患者死因不明。
非分期新式腹主动脉-髂动脉系统重建和冷冻保存同种异体移植物治疗主动脉移植物感染具有相似的短期和中期结果。然而,这两种方法都具有挑战性,发病率和死亡率都很高。