• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CAP-CR研究:意大利一线接受静脉输注5-氟尿嘧啶或口服卡培他滨治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的直接医疗费用

The CAP-CR study: direct medical costs in Italian metastatic colorectal cancer patients on first-line infusional 5-fluorouracil or oral capecitabine.

作者信息

Lopatriello S, Amoroso D, Donati S, Alabiso O, Forti L, Fornasiero A, Smergo A, Lalli A, Iacono C, Lucenti A, D'Alonzo L, Negrini C

机构信息

PBE Consulting, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2008 Nov;44(17):2615-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.08.010
PMID:18805000
Abstract

AIM

To describe the healthcare resource consumption of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients in the Italian healthcare setting.

METHODS

A retrospective chart analysis estimating direct medical costs of first-line infusional 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) or oral Capecitabine (CAP), associated or not with other chemotherapies, from the Italian Healthcare Service (IHCS) and Hospital (H) perspectives.

RESULTS

202 subjects were analysed. CAP patients (N=66) were older, with a more compromised clinical status and received less chemotherapy agents in association than 5-FU patients (N=136). From the IHCS perspective, mean total costs per patient were 12,029 euro and 5,781 euro in the 5-FU and CAP arms respectively; 7,338 euro and 4,688 euro from the H perspective. The infusional administration route of 5-FU was a cost driver from both perspectives. Sensitivity analyses found the results to be robust to variations in base case parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of MCRC by oral chemotherapies may be an economically advantageous option to both IHCS and hospitals.

摘要

目的

描述意大利医疗环境下转移性结直肠癌(MCRC)患者的医疗资源消耗情况。

方法

从意大利医疗服务机构(IHCS)和医院(H)的角度,通过回顾性病历分析评估一线输注5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)或口服卡培他滨(CAP)(无论是否联合其他化疗)的直接医疗费用。

结果

分析了202名受试者。与5-FU组患者(N = 136)相比,CAP组患者(N = 66)年龄更大,临床状态更差,联合使用的化疗药物更少。从IHCS角度看,5-FU组和CAP组每位患者的平均总费用分别为12,029欧元和5,781欧元;从医院角度看分别为7,338欧元和4,688欧元。5-FU的输注给药途径在两个角度都是成本驱动因素。敏感性分析发现结果对基础病例参数的变化具有稳健性。

结论

口服化疗药物治疗MCRC对IHCS和医院而言可能是一个经济上有利的选择。

相似文献

1
The CAP-CR study: direct medical costs in Italian metastatic colorectal cancer patients on first-line infusional 5-fluorouracil or oral capecitabine.CAP-CR研究:意大利一线接受静脉输注5-氟尿嘧啶或口服卡培他滨治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的直接医疗费用
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Nov;44(17):2615-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 18.
2
Pharmaco-economic analysis of direct medical costs of metastatic colorectal cancer therapy with XELOX or modified FOLFOX-6 regimens: implications for health-care utilization in Australia.采用XELOX或改良FOLFOX - 6方案治疗转移性结直肠癌的直接医疗成本的药物经济学分析:对澳大利亚医疗保健利用的影响
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep;9(3):239-48. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12044. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
3
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer in Taiwan.卡培他滨与氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙作为辅助治疗台湾 III 期结肠癌的药物经济学分析。
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5):647-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
4
Patients with locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer treated with capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil as monotherapy or combination therapy with oxaliplatin: a cost comparison.卡培他滨对比氟尿嘧啶单药或联合奥沙利铂用于治疗局部晚期和转移性结直肠癌的患者:成本比较。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2010 Oct;9(4):229-37. doi: 10.3816/CCC.2010.n.034.
5
Capecitabine versus bolus fluorouracil plus leucovorin (folinic acid) as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with Dukes' C colon cancer : economic evaluation in an Italian NHS setting.卡培他滨与推注氟尿嘧啶加亚叶酸钙作为 Dukes' C 期结肠癌患者辅助化疗的比较:意大利国民健康服务体系环境下的经济学评估
Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(10):645-55. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200828100-00005.
6
Cost-minimisation analysis in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in France: XELOX versus FOLFOX-6.法国转移性结直肠癌一线治疗中的成本最小化分析:XELOX 与 FOLFOX-6。
Oncology. 2010;79(3-4):174-80. doi: 10.1159/000325999. Epub 2011 Feb 28.
7
Cost identification of Nordic FLIRI, Nordic FLOX, XELIRI and XELOX in first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in Sweden -- a clinical practice model approach.在瑞典,针对转移性结直肠癌一线治疗中北欧 FLIRI、北欧 FLOX、XELIRI 和 XELOX 的成本识别——一种临床实践模型方法。
Acta Oncol. 2012 Sep;51(7):840-8. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.713507. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
8
Efficacy of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine or infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of randomized trials.奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨或持续输注氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙治疗转移性结直肠癌患者的疗效:随机试验的汇总分析
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 20;26(36):5910-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.7759. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
9
Re: Should capecitabine replace infusional fluorouracil and leucovorin when combined with oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer?回复:在转移性结直肠癌中,当卡培他滨与奥沙利铂联合使用时,它是否应取代氟尿嘧啶持续输注和亚叶酸钙?
J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 1;26(13):2226-7; author reply 2228. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.4244.
10
Economic impact of simplified de Gramont regimen in first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.简化的德·格拉蒙方案在转移性结直肠癌一线治疗中的经济影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Jun;7(2):107-13. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0338-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Dietary silymarin supplementation enhances chemotherapy efficacy of capecitabine and irinotecan and mitigates hepatotoxicity in a mouse model of colon cancer.在结肠癌小鼠模型中,膳食补充水飞蓟素可增强卡培他滨和伊立替康的化疗疗效,并减轻肝毒性。
Res Pharm Sci. 2025 Feb 20;20(1):77-94. doi: 10.4103/RPS.RPS_204_24. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Comparative efficacy of cetuximab combined with FOLFOX or CAPEOX in first-line treatment of RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter case-control study.西妥昔单抗联合FOLFOX或CAPEOX一线治疗RAS/BRAF野生型转移性结直肠癌的疗效比较:一项多中心病例对照研究
Anticancer Drugs. 2025 Jun 1;36(5):383-393. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000001697. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of XELOX versus XELOX plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer in a public hospital school.
XELOX 与 XELOX 联合贝伐珠单抗治疗公立医院转移性结直肠癌的成本效果分析。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Oct 17;17(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3679-5.
4
Comparing the effectiveness of capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin therapy for elderly Taiwanese stage III colorectal cancer patients based on quality-of-life measures (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38) and a new cost assessment tool.基于生活质量测量(QLQ-C30 和 QLQ-CR38)和新的成本评估工具比较卡培他滨与 5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸治疗台湾老年 III 期结直肠癌患者的疗效。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 May 19;13:61. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0261-1.
5
Economic studies in colorectal cancer: challenges in measuring and comparing costs.结直肠癌的经济学研究:成本测量与比较中的挑战
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2013;2013(46):62-78. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgt001.
6
Palliative treatment of colorectal cancer in Germany: cost of care and quality of life.德国结直肠癌姑息治疗:医疗成本和生活质量。
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Aug;14(4):629-38. doi: 10.1007/s10198-012-0408-5. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
7
Economic comparison of capecitabine + oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil + oxaliplatin in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer.卡培他滨+奥沙利铂与 5-氟尿嘧啶+奥沙利铂在结肠癌辅助治疗中的经济学比较。
Cancer Manag Res. 2012;4:99-103. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S29267. Epub 2012 Mar 27.