Christmann Markus, Tomicic Maja T, Gestrich Christopher, Roos Wynand P, Bohr Vilhelm A, Kaina Bernd
Department of Toxicology, University of Mainz, Obere Zahlbacher Strasse 67, D-55131 Mainz, Germany.
DNA Repair (Amst). 2008 Dec 1;7(12):1999-2009. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
The Werner syndrome helicase/3'-exonuclease (WRN) is a major component of the DNA repair and replication machinery. To analyze whether WRN is involved in the repair of topoisomerase-induced DNA damage we utilized U2-OS cells, in which WRN is stably down-regulated (wrn-kd), and the corresponding wild-type cells (wrn-wt). We show that cells not expressing WRN are hypersensitive to the toxic effect of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan, but not to the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide. This was shown by mass survival assays, colony formation and induction of apoptosis. Upon topotecan treatment WRN deficient cells showed enhanced DNA replication inhibition and S-phase arrest, whereas after treatment with etoposide they showed the same cell cycle response as the wild-type. A considerable difference between WRN and wild-type cells was observed for DNA single- and double-strand break formation in response to topotecan. Topotecan induced DNA single-strand breaks 6h after treatment. In both wrn-wt and wrn-kd cells these breaks were repaired at similar kinetics. However, in wrn-kd but not wrn-wt cells they were converted into DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) at high frequency, as shown by neutral comet assay and phosphorylation of H2AX. Our data provide evidence that WRN is involved in the repair of topoisomerase I, but not topoisomerase II-induced DNA damage, most likely via preventing the conversion of DNA single-strand breaks into DSBs during the resolution of stalled replication forks at topo I-DNA complexes. We suggest that the WRN status of tumor cells impacts anticancer therapy with topoisomerase I, but not topoisomerase II inhibitors.
沃纳综合征解旋酶/3'-核酸外切酶(WRN)是DNA修复和复制机制的主要组成部分。为了分析WRN是否参与拓扑异构酶诱导的DNA损伤修复,我们使用了U2-OS细胞(其中WRN稳定下调,即wrn-kd)和相应的野生型细胞(wrn-wt)。我们发现,不表达WRN的细胞对拓扑异构酶I抑制剂拓扑替康的毒性作用高度敏感,但对拓扑异构酶II抑制剂依托泊苷不敏感。这通过大规模存活分析、集落形成和凋亡诱导得以证明。在拓扑替康处理后,WRN缺陷细胞显示出增强的DNA复制抑制和S期停滞,而在用依托泊苷处理后,它们表现出与野生型相同的细胞周期反应。在响应拓扑替康时,观察到WRN细胞和野生型细胞在DNA单链和双链断裂形成方面存在显著差异。拓扑替康在处理后6小时诱导DNA单链断裂。在wrn-wt和wrn-kd细胞中,这些断裂以相似的动力学进行修复。然而,如中性彗星试验和H2AX磷酸化所示,在wrn-kd细胞而非wrn-wt细胞中,它们以高频率转化为DNA双链断裂(DSB)。我们的数据提供了证据,表明WRN参与拓扑异构酶I诱导的DNA损伤修复,但不参与拓扑异构酶II诱导的DNA损伤修复,最有可能是通过在拓扑异构酶I-DNA复合物处停滞的复制叉的解离过程中防止DNA单链断裂转化为DSB。我们认为肿瘤细胞的WRN状态会影响拓扑异构酶I抑制剂的抗癌治疗,但不影响拓扑异构酶II抑制剂的抗癌治疗。