• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于制作多单位种植体支持的固定修复体的数字与传统工作流程的比较评估：一项文献综述。

Comparative Evaluation of Digital and Conventional Workflows for the Fabrication of Multi-Unit Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations: An Empty Review.

作者信息

Hashemi Ali Mahmoud, Hasanzadeh Mahya, Khraisat Ameen, Alikhasi Marzieh

机构信息

Dental Implant Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Front Dent. 2024 Jun 9;21:20. doi: 10.18502/fid.v21i20.15714. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.18502/fid.v21i20.15714
PMID:39011351
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11247140/
Abstract

This study aimed to do a comprehensive systematic review on the comparison of digital and conventional workflows regarding prosthetic outcomes, accuracy of implant impressions, framework passivity and fit, and clinical fabrication of multi-unit implant-supported fixed restorations. The EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles published up until April 2020. No in-vivo article was found to compare full digital and conventional workflows regarding the accuracy of implant impressions, passivity and fit of frameworks, and prosthetic outcomes. There was no study to investigate full digital and conventional workflows for clinical fabrication of multi-unit implant-supported fixed restorations. This empty review highlights the need for further research to compare full digital and conventional workflows for implant-supported restorations.

摘要

本研究旨在对数字化和传统工作流程在修复效果、种植体印模准确性、支架被动就位及贴合度以及多单位种植体支持的固定修复体的临床制作方面进行全面系统的综述。检索了截至2020年4月在EMBASE、PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆数据库中发表的相关文章。未找到关于种植体印模准确性、支架被动就位及贴合度以及修复效果方面比较全数字化和传统工作流程的体内研究文章。也没有研究调查多单位种植体支持的固定修复体临床制作的全数字化和传统工作流程。这一空白综述凸显了进一步研究以比较种植体支持修复的全数字化和传统工作流程的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/818c/11247140/951bee78b513/FID-21-20-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/818c/11247140/951bee78b513/FID-21-20-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/818c/11247140/951bee78b513/FID-21-20-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Digital and Conventional Workflows for the Fabrication of Multi-Unit Implant-Supported Fixed Restorations: An Empty Review.用于制作多单位种植体支持的固定修复体的数字与传统工作流程的比较评估：一项文献综述。
Front Dent. 2024 Jun 9;21:20. doi: 10.18502/fid.v21i20.15714. eCollection 2024.
2
Intraoral scanners in implant prosthodontics. A narrative review.种植修复学中的口内扫描仪。一项叙述性综述。
J Dent. 2024 Sep;148:105152. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105152. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
3
Comparative analyses of time efficiency and cost in fabricating fixed implant-supported prostheses in digital, hybrid, and conventional workflows: A systematic review and meta-analysis.数字、混合和传统工作流程中制作固定种植体支持修复体的时间效率和成本的比较分析：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Mar;133(3):689-712. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.06.024. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
4
The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review.固定修复学中的完整数字工作流程：一项系统综述
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Sep 19;17(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0.
5
Digital versus conventional workflow for the fabrication of multiunit fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vertical marginal fit in controlled in vitro studies.数字化与传统 workflow 在多单位固定修复体制作中的比较：对控制体外研究中垂直边缘适合性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Nov;122(5):435-440. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.001. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
6
Marginal and internal adaptation of single crowns and fixed dental prostheses by using digital and conventional workflows: A systematic review and meta-analysis.采用数字化和传统工作流程对单冠和固定义齿进行边缘和内部适合性的评估：系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Sep;126(3):360-368. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Comparison of digital and silicone impressions for single-tooth implants and two- and three-unit implants for a free-end edentulous saddle.数字化印模和硅橡胶印模在单个种植体及游离端无牙颌的两个和三个单位种植体中的应用比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Sep 23;21(1):464. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01836-1.
8
Time efficiency and cost analysis between digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review.固定义齿制作中数字化与传统工作流程的时间效率和成本分析：一项系统评价。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jan;133(1):71-84. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.01.003. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
9
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of implant-supported reconstructions using digital workflows: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于数字化流程的种植体支持修复的患者报告结局测量（PROMs）：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Oct;32 Suppl 21:318-335. doi: 10.1111/clr.13846.
10
Fully Digital versus Conventional Workflows for Fabricating Posterior Three-Unit Implant-Supported Reconstructions: A Prospective Crossover Clinical Trial.全数字化与传统流程在制作后牙三单位种植体支持修复体中的应用：一项前瞻性交叉临床试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 12;19(18):11456. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811456.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the accuracy and stress distribution of 3-unit implant supported prostheses obtained by different manufacturing methods.不同制作方法获得的 3 单位种植体支持式修复体的准确性和应力分布评估。
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019 Sep;102:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.059. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
2
Comparative Study Between an Immediate Loading Protocol Using the Digital Workflow and a Conventional Protocol for Dental Implant Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.使用数字化工作流程的即刻加载方案与传统方案在牙种植治疗中的对比研究：一项随机临床试验
J Clin Med. 2019 May 7;8(5):622. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050622.
3
Immediate loading of multiple splinted implants via complete digital workflow: A pilot clinical study with 1-year follow-up.
多颗支抗种植体的即刻负载：一项为期 1 年随访的初步临床研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Jun;21(3):446-453. doi: 10.1111/cid.12781. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
4
Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial.常规与数字化印模用于全上颌螺钉固位修复的随机临床试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 7;16(5):829. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050829.
5
Digital versus Traditional Workflow for Posterior Maxillary Rehabilitations Supported by One Straight and One Tilted Implant: A 3-Year Prospective Comparative Study.数字化与传统工作流程在后牙区种植修复中的应用比较：一项为期 3 年的前瞻性研究
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Nov 11;2018:4149107. doi: 10.1155/2018/4149107. eCollection 2018.
6
Digital vs Conventional Workflow for Screw-Retained Single-Implant Crowns: A Comparison of Key Considerations.用于螺丝固位单颗种植体牙冠的数字化与传统工作流程：关键考量因素比较
Int J Prosthodont. 2018 Nov/Dec;31(6):577-579. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5938.
7
Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: Marginal and internal fit.随机对照临床试验数字和传统工作流程在氧化锆陶瓷固定修复体制作中的应用。第三部分：边缘适合和内部适合。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Mar;121(3):426-431. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
8
Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors.口腔内扫描仪的准确性：影响因素的系统评价
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2018 Aug 30;26(3):101-121. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_01752Abduo21.
9
Precision and Accuracy of a Digital Impression Scanner in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation.全口种植修复中数字印模扫描仪的精度与准确性
Int J Prosthodont. 2018 Mar/Apr;31(2):171-175. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5535.
10
Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression.口腔内扫描仪技术：制作成功印模的综述。
J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017:8427595. doi: 10.1155/2017/8427595. Epub 2017 Sep 5.