Bindemann Markus, Burton A Mike
Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, 58 Hillhead Street, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Vision Res. 2008 Nov;48(25):2555-61. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.001.
When faces are turned upside-down, many aspects of face processing are severely disrupted. Here we report an instance where this face inversion effect is not found. In a visual cueing paradigm an inverted face was paired with an inverted object in a cue display, followed by a target in one of the cue locations (Experiment 1). Responses were faster to face-cued targets, indicating an attention bias for inverted faces. When upright and inverted face cues were paired in Experiment 2, no attention bias for either cue type was found, suggesting that attention was drawn equally to both types of stimuli. Despite this, attention could be biased selectively toward upright or inverted faces in Experiment 3, by manipulating the predictiveness of either type of cue, which shows that observers can distinguish upright and inverted faces under these conditions. A fourth experiment provided a replication of Experiment 2 with an extended stimulus set and increased task demands. These findings suggest that visual attributes that can influence the allocation of an observer's attention to faces are available in both upright and inverted orientations.
当面孔倒置时,面孔加工的许多方面都会受到严重干扰。在此我们报告一个未发现这种面孔倒置效应的实例。在一个视觉提示范式中,在提示显示中一个倒置的面孔与一个倒置的物体配对,随后在其中一个提示位置出现一个目标(实验1)。对面孔提示的目标反应更快,表明对倒置面孔存在注意偏向。在实验2中,当正立和倒置的面孔提示配对时,未发现对任何一种提示类型的注意偏向,这表明对两种类型的刺激的注意程度相同。尽管如此,在实验3中,通过操纵任一种提示类型的预测性,注意可以选择性地偏向正立或倒置面孔,这表明观察者在这些条件下能够区分正立和倒置面孔。第四个实验用扩展的刺激集和增加的任务要求重复了实验2。这些发现表明,能够影响观察者对面孔注意分配的视觉属性在正立和倒置方向上都是存在的。