Hussain Zahra, Sekuler Allison B, Bennett Patrick J
Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Vision Res. 2009 Sep;49(18):2273-84. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.06.014. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
We trained subjects to identify either upright or inverted faces in a 10AFC task and measured performance subsequently in four conditions: same- and different-upright faces, and same- and different-inverted faces. Performance improved for both the upright-trained and the inverted-trained groups. The improvements were highly specific to the trained face exemplars, and largely specific to the trained face orientations. This pattern of results yielded an increase in the face-inversion effect after upright-training, and a decrease in the inversion effect after inverted-training, but only for the trained set of faces in both groups. A similar pattern of results was found for phase-scrambled faces in which the configural structure of faces had been removed: although there was no baseline inversion effect for the scrambled stimuli, inversion effects emerged after training. We consider the implications of this pattern of learning for current views on the face-inversion effect, and face-encoding more generally.
我们训练受试者在10AFC任务中识别正立或倒立的面孔,随后在四种条件下测量其表现:相同和不同的正立面孔,以及相同和不同的倒立面孔。正立训练组和倒立训练组的表现均有所提高。这些提高高度特定于训练过的面孔范例,并且在很大程度上特定于训练过的面孔方向。这种结果模式导致正立训练后面孔倒置效应增加,倒立训练后倒置效应减少,但仅针对两组中训练过的面孔集。对于去除了面孔构型结构的相位打乱面孔也发现了类似的结果模式:尽管对于打乱的刺激没有基线倒置效应,但训练后出现了倒置效应。我们考虑这种学习模式对当前关于面孔倒置效应以及更一般的面孔编码观点的影响。