Burns Yvonne R, Danks Marcella, O'Callaghan Michael J, Gray Peter H, Cooper David, Poulsen Leith, Watter Pauline
Growth and Development Unit, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Australia.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Feb;51(2):136-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03118.x. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
Motor coordination difficulties and poor fitness exist in the extremely low birthweight (ELBW) population. This study investigated the relative impact of motor coordination on the fitness of ELBW children aged 11 to 13 years. One hundred and nine children were recruited to the study: 54 ELBW participants (mean age at assessment 12y 6mo; 31 male, 23 female; mean birthweight 769g, SD 148g; mean gestational age 26.6 weeks, SD 2.1 weeks) and 55 comparison children (mean age at assessment 12y 5mo; 28 males, 27 females; at least 37 weeks' gestation). All children completed the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC), functional tests of postural stability and strength, growth measures, and tests of respiratory function. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max) was calculated from a 20m shuttle run test as a measure of fitness. The ELBW group had greater problems with postural stability (p=0.001) and motor coordination (p=0.001), with 70% rated as having a definite motor problem on the MABC brackets (those who scored less than the 5(th) centile on the MABC). The ELBW was also less fit than the comparison group (p=0.001), with 45% below the 10th centile for VO(2)max. There were differences between the groups for growth, strength, and particularly respiratory function. However, respiratory function did not significantly correlate with VO(2)max in the ELBW group. Motor coordination was the most powerful predictor of VO(2)max in both the ELBW (p=0.001) and the comparison groups (p=0.001).
极低出生体重(ELBW)人群存在运动协调困难和身体素质差的问题。本研究调查了运动协调对11至13岁ELBW儿童身体素质的相对影响。109名儿童参与了该研究:54名ELBW参与者(评估时平均年龄12岁6个月;31名男性,23名女性;平均出生体重769克,标准差148克;平均胎龄26.6周,标准差2.1周)和55名对照儿童(评估时平均年龄12岁5个月;28名男性,27名女性;胎龄至少37周)。所有儿童均完成了儿童运动评估量表(MABC)、姿势稳定性和力量功能测试、生长指标测量以及呼吸功能测试。通过20米往返跑测试计算最大摄氧量(VO₂max)作为身体素质的衡量指标。ELBW组在姿势稳定性(p = 0.001)和运动协调(p = 0.001)方面存在更大问题,70%的ELBW组儿童在MABC量表上被评定为存在明确的运动问题(即在MABC量表上得分低于第5百分位数的儿童)。ELBW组的身体素质也低于对照组(p = 0.001),45%的ELBW组儿童VO₂max低于第10百分位数。两组在生长、力量,尤其是呼吸功能方面存在差异。然而,ELBW组的呼吸功能与VO₂max之间无显著相关性。运动协调是ELBW组(p = 0.001)和对照组(p = 0.001)中VO₂max的最有力预测因素。