Suppr超能文献

使用高压注射进行腰丛阻滞会导致对侧和硬膜外扩散。

Lumbar plexus block using high-pressure injection leads to contralateral and epidural spread.

作者信息

Gadsden Jeff C, Lindenmuth Danielle M, Hadzic Admir, Xu Daquan, Somasundarum Lakshmanasamy, Flisinski Kamil A

机构信息

Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2008 Oct;109(4):683-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818631a7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The main advantage of lumbar plexus block over neuraxial anesthesia is unilateral blockade; however, the relatively common occurrence of bilateral spread (up to 27%) makes this advantage unpredictable. The authors hypothesized that high injection pressures during lumbar plexus block carry a higher risk of bilateral or neuraxial anesthesia.

METHODS

Eighty patients undergoing knee arthroscopy (age 18-65 yr; American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II) during a standard, nerve stimulator-guided lumbar plexus block using 35 ml mepivacaine, 1.5%, were scheduled to be studied. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a low-pressure (< 15 psi) or a high-pressure (> 20 psi) injection, as assessed by an inline injection pressure monitor (BSmart; Concert Medical LLC, Norwell, MA). The block success rate and the presence of bilateral sensory and/or motor blockade were assessed.

RESULTS

An interim analysis was performed at n = 20 after an unexpectedly high number of patients had neuraxial spread, necessitating early termination of the study. Five of 10 patients (50%) in the high-pressure group had a neuraxial block with a dermatomal sensory level T10 or higher. In contrast, no patient in the low-pressure group (n = 10) had evidence of neuraxial spread. Moreover, 6 patients (60%) in the high-pressure group demonstrated bilateral sensory blockade in the femoral distribution, whereas no patient in the low-pressure group had evidence of a bilateral femoral block.

CONCLUSIONS

Injection of local anesthetic with high injection pressure (> 20 psi) during lumbar plexus block commonly results in unwanted bilateral blockade and is associated with high risk of neuraxial blockade.

摘要

背景

腰丛阻滞相对于椎管内麻醉的主要优势在于单侧阻滞;然而,双侧扩散(发生率高达27%)相对常见,使得这一优势难以预测。作者推测,腰丛阻滞期间的高注射压力会增加双侧或椎管内麻醉的风险。

方法

计划对80例接受膝关节镜检查的患者(年龄18 - 65岁;美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为I或II级)进行研究,这些患者在标准的神经刺激器引导下进行腰丛阻滞,使用1.5%的35毫升甲哌卡因。通过在线注射压力监测器(BSmart;Concert Medical LLC,马萨诸塞州诺韦尔)评估,患者被随机分配接受低压力(< 15 psi)或高压力(> 20 psi)注射。评估阻滞成功率以及双侧感觉和/或运动阻滞的情况。

结果

在出现意外高比例的患者发生椎管内扩散后,在n = 20时进行了中期分析,这使得研究提前终止。高压组10例患者中有5例(50%)出现了T10或更高皮节感觉水平的椎管内阻滞。相比之下,低压组(n = 10)没有患者出现椎管内扩散的证据。此外,高压组6例患者(60%)表现出股神经分布区域的双侧感觉阻滞,而低压组没有患者出现双侧股神经阻滞的证据。

结论

腰丛阻滞期间以高注射压力(> 20 psi)注射局部麻醉药通常会导致不必要的双侧阻滞,并与椎管内阻滞的高风险相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验