• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞对行髋关节手术的老年患者围手术期疼痛管理的疗效:系统评价与荟萃分析及试验序贯分析的研究方案。

Efficacy of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on perioperative pain management in elderly patients undergoing hip surgical procedures: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 5;13(1):e065304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065304.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065304
PMID:36604133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9827252/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

An increasing number of elderly patients suffer from hip diseases associated with moderate to severe perioperative pain during the accelerating global ageing process. Optimal analgesia can decrease perioperative complications and facilitate elderly patients' perioperative recovery. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a relatively new, analgesia adequate and motor-sparing block technique for perioperative pain management of hip diseases. However, the efficacy of PENG block remains unclear as the limited clinical evidence. Then, we will perform a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the efficacy of PENG block for perioperative pain management.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese BioMedical Literature, Wanfang and VIP databases will be searched from inception to August 2022 to identify randomised controlled trials of elderly patients accepting PENG block for hip diseases. The primary outcome will be the pain intensity after pain management. Secondary outcomes will be quadriceps strength, perioperative rescue analgesia information and perioperative complications. Assessment of heterogeneity will be primarily inspected by forest plots. If there is no indication of funnel plot asymmetry, a random-effects meta-analysis will be performed. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation and trial sequential analysis will be conducted to evaluate the evidence quality and control the random errors. Funnel plots and Egger's regression test will be performed to evaluate publication bias.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was not required for this systematic review protocol. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022313895.

摘要

简介

在全球老龄化进程加速的背景下,越来越多的老年患者患有与围手术期中度至重度疼痛相关的髋部疾病。最佳的镇痛效果可以降低围手术期并发症,促进老年患者的围手术期康复。囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞是一种新的、镇痛效果充分且能保留运动功能的阻滞技术,可用于髋部疾病的围手术期疼痛管理。然而,由于临床证据有限,PENG 阻滞的疗效尚不清楚。因此,我们将制定一个系统评价和荟萃分析的方案,以确定 PENG 阻滞在髋部疾病围手术期疼痛管理中的疗效。

方法与分析

从建库至 2022 年 8 月,我们将在 PubMed、Ovid Medline、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、Web of Science、中国知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方和维普数据库中搜索接受 PENG 阻滞治疗髋部疾病的老年患者的随机对照试验。主要结局指标为疼痛管理后的疼痛强度。次要结局指标为股四头肌力量、围手术期补救性镇痛信息和围手术期并发症。异质性评估主要通过森林图进行检查。如果没有漏斗图不对称的迹象,将进行随机效应荟萃分析。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具、推荐评估、制定和评价分级和试验序贯分析来评估证据质量并控制随机误差。将进行漏斗图和 Egger 回归检验以评估发表偏倚。

伦理与传播

本系统评价方案不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评审的出版物进行传播。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022313895。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/705a/9827252/701f4fb45c87/bmjopen-2022-065304f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/705a/9827252/701f4fb45c87/bmjopen-2022-065304f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/705a/9827252/701f4fb45c87/bmjopen-2022-065304f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on perioperative pain management in elderly patients undergoing hip surgical procedures: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞对行髋关节手术的老年患者围手术期疼痛管理的疗效:系统评价与荟萃分析及试验序贯分析的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 5;13(1):e065304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065304.
2
Deep neuromuscular block for minimally invasive lung surgery: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.深度神经肌肉阻滞用于微创肺手术:系统评价与荟萃分析及试验序贯分析研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 24;12(5):e056816. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056816.
3
Ultrasound-guided puncture drainage versus surgical incision drainage for deep neck space abscesses: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.超声引导下穿刺引流与手术切开引流治疗深部颈部间隙脓肿的系统评价与荟萃分析及试验序贯分析研究方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 4;14(1):e077631. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077631.
4
Remote ischaemic preconditioning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的远程缺血预处理:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 25;14(4):e080200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080200.
5
Effects of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative recovery in elderly patients with hip fracture: study protocol for a randomised, parallel controlled, double-blind trial.囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞对老年髋部骨折患者术后恢复的影响:一项随机、平行对照、双盲试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 29;12(3):e051321. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051321.
6
Efficacy of virtual reality techniques in cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: protocol for a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and trial sequential analysis.虚拟现实技术在心肺复苏培训中的效果:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析和试验序贯分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 11;12(2):e058827. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058827.
7
Comparison of analgesic effects of pericapsular nerve group block and fascia iliaca compartment block during hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.髋关节置换术中关节囊周围神经组阻滞与髂筋膜间隙阻滞镇痛效果的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Nov;67(11):962-972. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_672_23. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Does pericapsular nerve group block have limited analgesia at the initial post-operative period? Systematic review and meta-analysis.囊周神经群阻滞在术后初期的镇痛效果有限吗?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Anesth. 2023 Feb;37(1):138-153. doi: 10.1007/s00540-022-03129-5. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
10
Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Combined With Local Infiltration Analgesia on Postoperative Pain After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导下关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞联合局部浸润镇痛对全髋关节置换术后疼痛的疗效:一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6):1096-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.12.023. Epub 2022 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Associated with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) for Total Hip Replacement Surgery: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.全髋关节置换手术中与股外侧皮神经(LFCN)阻滞相关的关节周围神经组(PENG)阻滞与髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB)的比较:双盲随机对照试验
J Pers Med. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):230. doi: 10.3390/jpm15060230.
2
Perineural dexamethasone effectively prolongs anaesthesic block duration in total hip arthroplasty, reduces opioid consumption, and does not compromise motor function, nerve integrity, or glycaemic control.神经周围注射地塞米松可有效延长全髋关节置换术中麻醉阻滞时间,减少阿片类药物用量,且不影响运动功能、神经完整性或血糖控制。
Int Orthop. 2025 Aug;49(8):1791-1799. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06578-1. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Combined pericapsular nerve group and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve blocks for hip fracture in a polytraumatized patient-A case report.多创伤患者髋部骨折联合关节周围神经组和股外侧皮神经阻滞——病例报告
Saudi J Anaesth. 2022 Apr-Jun;16(2):211-213. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_625_21. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
2
Preemptive pericapsular nerve group block to facilitate sitting position for neuraxial anesthesia in patients with acetabular fractures: A case series.髋臼骨折患者行轴索麻醉时采用预防性关节囊周围神经组阻滞以利于坐位:病例系列
Saudi J Anaesth. 2022 Apr-Jun;16(2):221-225. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_614_21. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
3
Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Plus Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block vs. Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Hip Replacement Surgery.髋关节置换手术中关节周围神经组阻滞联合股外侧皮神经阻滞与髂筋膜间隙阻滞的比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 4;14(3):984. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030984.
4
The Utilization of Ultrasound-Guided Regional Nerve Blocks in Anesthetic Management for Fracture Surgery.超声引导下区域神经阻滞在骨折手术麻醉管理中的应用
J Pain Res. 2025 Jan 20;18:353-366. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S492151. eCollection 2025.
5
Nerve Blocks for Post-Surgical Pain Management: A Narrative Review of Current Research.用于术后疼痛管理的神经阻滞:当前研究的叙述性综述
J Pain Res. 2024 Oct 2;17:3217-3239. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S476563. eCollection 2024.
6
Inter-Semispinalis Plane Block Versus General Anesthesia for Postoperative Analgesia in Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.颈后棘突间平面阻滞与全身麻醉用于颈椎后路手术术后镇痛的随机对照试验
Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Feb 16;14(1):e143369. doi: 10.5812/aapm-143369. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Effects of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative recovery in elderly patients with hip fracture: study protocol for a randomised, parallel controlled, double-blind trial.
囊周神经群(PENG)阻滞对老年髋部骨折患者术后恢复的影响:一项随机、平行对照、双盲试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 29;12(3):e051321. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051321.
4
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block versus Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.全髋关节置换术中关节囊周围神经组(PENG)阻滞与腹股沟上筋膜髂筋膜间隙阻滞的比较:一项随机临床试验
J Pers Med. 2022 Mar 6;12(3):408. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030408.
5
Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block on the Postoperative Analgesic Effect in Patients Undergoing Surgeries for Hip Fracture under Spinal Anesthesia.比较研究:评估超声引导下关节周围神经群阻滞与髂筋膜间隙阻滞对脊髓麻醉下行髋部骨折手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响
Anesth Essays Res. 2021 Jul-Sep;15(3):285-289. doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_122_21. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
6
Pericapsular nerve group block results in a longer analgesic effect and shorter time to discharge than femoral nerve block in patients after hip fracture surgery: a single-center double-blinded randomized trial.关节囊周围神经群阻滞在髋关节骨折手术后的患者中比股神经阻滞具有更长的镇痛效果和更短的出院时间:一项单中心、双盲、随机试验。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Mar;50(3):3000605221085073. doi: 10.1177/03000605221085073.
7
The Impact of Perioperative Multimodal Pain Management on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients (Aged 75 and Older) Undergoing Short-Segment Lumbar Fusion Surgery.围手术期多模式疼痛管理对接受短节段腰椎融合手术的75岁及以上患者术后结局的影响。
Pain Res Manag. 2022 Feb 27;2022:9052246. doi: 10.1155/2022/9052246. eCollection 2022.
8
Elective Total Hip Arthroplasties in Nonagenarians-Age Does Matter: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study.非高龄患者择期全髋关节置换术-年龄确实是关键因素:一项国家手术质量改进计划研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7S):S524-S529. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.067. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
9
Curative efficacy of surgical procedures for older patients with femoral neck fracture: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.老年股骨颈骨折患者手术治疗效果的网络荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Mar 2;17(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02914-y.
10
Midterm Outcomes After Hip Labral Augmentation in Revision Hip Arthroscopy.髋关节镜翻修术中髋关节盂唇修补的中期疗效。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Apr;50(5):1299-1305. doi: 10.1177/03635465221080162. Epub 2022 Mar 2.